| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | | 
27th July 2003, 07:28 PM
|  | PeteAce - In memory of WinAce 33  | | Join Date: 30th June 2002
Posts: 8,425
Blessings: 2,093,298
Reps: 9,311,669,886,675,212 (power: 9,311,669,886,693) | | | Creationist flood challenge For those who believe in the world-wide flood of Noah, I would like to see a couple things answered with respect to the flood and geology:
1) Which geological strata are pre-flood, which strata were laid down during the flood, and which strata are post-flood?
2) Based on the geological evidence, what is the time frame for the flood; when did it occur and how long was it? (note the bolded section)
__________________ Creationism has not made a single contribution to agriculture, medicine, conservation, forestry, pathology, or any other applied area of biology. Creationism has yielded no classifications, no biogeographies, no underlying mechanisms, no unifying concepts with which to study organisms or life. - Botanical Society of America's Statement on Evolution | 
27th July 2003, 09:31 PM
|  | Contributor 65  | | Join Date: 4th March 2003
Posts: 6,393
Blessings: 117,764 My Mood
Reps: 19,183,710,574,649,584 (power: 19,183,710,574,664) | | Originally Posted by Pete Harcoff For those who believe in the world-wide flood of Noah, I would like to see a couple things answered with respect to the flood and geology:
1) Which geological strata are pre-flood, which strata were laid down during the flood, and which strata are post-flood?
2) Based on the geological evidence, what is the time frame for the flood; when did it occur and how long was it? (note the bolded section)
You aren't seriously expecting answers to these questions are you? If you are can I have some of what you must be smoking?
The Frumious Bandersnatch | 
27th July 2003, 09:42 PM
|  | PeteAce - In memory of WinAce 33  | | Join Date: 30th June 2002
Posts: 8,425
Blessings: 2,093,298
Reps: 9,311,669,886,675,212 (power: 9,311,669,886,693) | | Originally Posted by Frumious Bandersnatch You aren't seriously expecting answers to these questions are you? If you are can I have some of what you must be smoking?
Oh I know. But you'd think the inability for creationist flood geology to answer such basic questions would be cause for concern among creationists.
I'd be interested to see if any of the forum's flood proponents take a stab at it, but yeah, I don't think anyone can answer these.
__________________ Creationism has not made a single contribution to agriculture, medicine, conservation, forestry, pathology, or any other applied area of biology. Creationism has yielded no classifications, no biogeographies, no underlying mechanisms, no unifying concepts with which to study organisms or life. - Botanical Society of America's Statement on Evolution | 
27th July 2003, 11:28 PM
|  | Contributor 65  | | Join Date: 4th March 2003
Posts: 6,393
Blessings: 117,764 My Mood
Reps: 19,183,710,574,649,584 (power: 19,183,710,574,664) | | Originally Posted by Pete Harcoff Oh I know. But you'd think the inability for creationist flood geology to answer such basic questions would be cause for concern among creationists.
I'd be interested to see if any of the forum's flood proponents take a stab at it, but yeah, I don't think anyone can answer these.
It doesn't bother them at all that layers deposited by this supposedly unique event that supposedly rearranged all the world's geology can't be distinguished from layers that were supposedly laid down either before or after the flood by totally different processes. Once you have made the huge leaps of illogic necessary to ignore all the other falsifications of the global flood this becomes a minor problem. After all when you can claim that desert deposits, fossil soils and massive layers of evaporated salt were formed during a worldwide flood the fact that you can't tell exactly what layers are flood deposits seems trivial. When Answers in Genesis gets their museum built they should put a sign over the door that says All logic abandon ye who enter here.
The Frumious Bandersnatch | 
28th July 2003, 12:20 AM
|  | Alive In God 29  | | Join Date: 6th February 2003 Location: SOCAL
Posts: 10,450
Blessings: 279,748
Reps: 12,055 (power: 32) | | | What evidence would one expect from a global watery cataclysm that drowned the animals, birds and people not on the Ark? All around the world, in rock layer after rock layer, there are billions of dead things that have been buried in water-carried mud and sand. Their state of preservation frequently tells of rapid burial and fossilization, just like one would expect in such a flood.
There is abundant evidence that many of the rock strata were laid down quickly, one after the other, without significant time breaks between them. Preservation of animal tracks, ripple marks and even raindrop marks, testifies to rapid covering of these features to enable their preservation. Polystrate fossils (ones which traverse many strata) speak of very quick deposition of the strata. The scarcity of erosion, soil formation, animal burrows and roots between layers also shows they must have been deposited in quick succession. The radical deformation of thick layers of sediment without evidence of cracking or melting also shows how all the layers must have been still soft when they were bent. Dykes (walls) and pipes (cylinders) of sandstone which connect with the same material many layers beneath show that the layers beneath must have been still soft, and contained much water. That the sandstone could be squeezed up through cracks above to form the 'clastic' dykes and pipes, again shows rapid deposition of many strata.
The world-wide distribution of many geological features and rock types is also consistent with a global Flood. The Morrison Formation is a layer of sedimentary rock that extends from Texas to Canada, clearly showing the fallacy of the still popular belief that 'the present is the key to the past' - there are no processes occurring on earth today that are laying down such large areas of sedimentary layers. In reality God's revelation about the past is the key to understanding the present.
The limited goegraphic extent of unconformities (clear breaks in the sequence of deposition with different tiltings of layers, etc.), is also consistent with the reality of the global Flood. And there are many other evidences for the Flood. | 
28th July 2003, 12:24 AM
|  | HI 28  | | Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 92,056
Reps: 5,365 (power: 27) | | Still didnt answer the challenge.
I think its interesting you mentioned rain drops, as its amazing a global flood could fossilize raindrops.
__________________
Wei wu wei
Green faeries | 
28th July 2003, 12:41 AM
|  | Alive In God 29  | | Join Date: 6th February 2003 Location: SOCAL
Posts: 10,450
Blessings: 279,748
Reps: 12,055 (power: 32) | | Absolutely
No problems though | 
28th July 2003, 12:45 AM
|  | HI 28  | | Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 92,056
Reps: 5,365 (power: 27) | | | Can you explain how it fossilized the rain drops?
Or how about something simplier,
was the flood a powerfull destructive flood, or a gentle one?
__________________
Wei wu wei
Green faeries | 
28th July 2003, 12:48 AM
|  | Alive In God 29  | | Join Date: 6th February 2003 Location: SOCAL
Posts: 10,450
Blessings: 279,748
Reps: 12,055 (power: 32) | | Man | 
28th July 2003, 01:12 AM
|  | Be wise and be smart 26 
| | Join Date: 16th December 2002 Location: University of Rhode Island
Posts: 1,539
Blessings: 265,855
Reps: 3,202,689,982,729,637 (power: 3,202,689,982,740) | | Originally Posted by Alessandro The Morrison Formation is a layer of sedimentary rock that extends from Texas to Canada
How about you try and explain why there are no birds, no sea life, and no modern mammals in the Morrison
I bet you can't
__________________ "Creationists are going to distort whatever arguments come up.... Archaeopteryx is half reptile and half bird any way you cut the deck, and so it is a Rosetta stone for evolution, whether it is related to dinosaurs or not. These creationists are confusing an argument about minor details of evolution with the indisputable fact of evolution." -Dr. Alan Feduccia, in an interview with Discover magazine |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |