| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | 
19th April 2003, 09:45 AM
|  | Followerof Quincy 26 
| | Join Date: 25th January 2003 Location: The land of the free, Sweden
Posts: 617
Blessings: 91,349
Reps: 66 (power: 0) | | | Higher air pressure and oxygen levels in ancient times? I hear Creationists mentioning it alot but never any actualy support of it...
Can anyone please fill me in? | 
19th April 2003, 12:38 PM
|  | Legend 60  | | Join Date: 22nd October 2002 Location: New York
Posts: 14,398
Blessings: 1,006,525 My Mood
Reps: 406,903,328,345,094,208 (power: 406,903,328,345,118) | | | Re: Higher air pressure and oxygen levels in ancient times? Today at 08:45 AM Taffsadar said this in Post #1
I hear Creationists mentioning it alot but never any actualy support of it...
Can anyone please fill me in?
Carl Baugh is one of those promoting this. The idea is that the atmosphere originally had more oxygen and pressure, thus supposedly supporting a lot more life and larger animals, particularly the dinosaurs.
Partly it is also supposed to be a result of the theory of the "dome" of the firmament and the "water canopy". This would supposedly be a testable deduction from that. http://www.keelynet.com/biology/baugh.htm | 
20th April 2003, 08:47 AM
|  | Followerof Quincy 26 
| | Join Date: 25th January 2003 Location: The land of the free, Sweden
Posts: 617
Blessings: 91,349
Reps: 66 (power: 0) | | | So it's all in their fantasy?
No scientific proof etc. | 
20th April 2003, 11:53 AM
|  | Legend 60  | | Join Date: 22nd October 2002 Location: New York
Posts: 14,398
Blessings: 1,006,525 My Mood
Reps: 406,903,328,345,094,208 (power: 406,903,328,345,118) | | Today at 07:47 AM Taffsadar said this in Post #3
So it's all in their fantasy?
No scientific proof etc.
Remember that "proof" is strictly speaking not available by science. Let's say no publicly available data. Baugh claims supporting data, but no one has ever seen it. | 
20th April 2003, 02:24 PM
|  | Contributor 65  | | Join Date: 4th March 2003
Posts: 6,393
Blessings: 117,764 My Mood
Reps: 19,183,710,574,649,584 (power: 19,183,710,574,664) | | | Higher oxygen pressure would have made for some interesting campfires but they would have been over pretty quickly. I hate think what the forest fires would have been like. As far as I can tell Baugh has no supporting data for anything he claims.
The Frumious Bandersnatch
__________________ A little Learning is a dang'rous Thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring:
There shallow Draughts intoxicate the Brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again. Alexander Pope | 
22nd April 2003, 07:50 PM
|  | Regular Member 36  | | Join Date: 23rd January 2003 Location: Florida
Posts: 257
Blessings: 91,238
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | Couple things pop in my mind right away.
1. The caustic effects of the high oxygen should be obvious to geology.
2. I know air samples are frozen in the glaciers and ice sheets, this should prove any period of high oxegen levels.
3. The high oxygen levels would cause faster aging due to increased metabolism and free radicals. This is contrary to the OT.
4. Increased preasure would have greatly increased the amount of heat retained from the sun, much the way Venus does today. This most certainly would have had an increase in global temperatures making the middle east a barren desert at that time.
Man, I'm not even a scientist. Do people actually believe this guy?
__________________ "The study of theology, as it stands in the Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authority; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion."
- Thomas Paine (1737-1809)
The Age of Reason |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |