Micro evolution + micro evolution = macro evolution

Pesto · #41 27th November 2006, 03:53 PM

Originally Posted by AV1611VET

Hmmm --- that's a good point. The Scriptures are silent on geocentrism/heliocentrism. I can't think of any verse right now that supports heliocentrism. Ecclesiastes 1:5 is the closest, but really doesn't say anything about the relation of the earth to the sun.
[bible]Ecclesiastes 1:5[/bible]

I would bet these people...

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/f...wforum.php?f=8

...would be able to point out a couple.

Edx · #42 27th November 2006, 04:32 PM

Originally Posted by AV1611VET

Hmmm --- that's a good point. The Scriptures are silent on geocentrism/heliocentrism. I can't think of any verse right now that supports heliocentrism. Ecclesiastes 1:5 is the closest, but really doesn't say anything about the relation of the earth to the sun.
[bible]Ecclesiastes 1:5[/bible]

So this is literal, but eveything describing a flat earth is just metaphorical? Dont know why I bother putting that as a question.

USincognito · #43 29th November 2006, 01:20 AM

It's this sort of tangenting that screws up perfectly good threads like this and so many just fall for it. Aggie spent a lot of time creating the OP, so how about just ignoring the geocentrism stuff and getting back to macro/micro and whether the avian fossil record evidences Macro.