| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | | 
15th April 2003, 08:55 PM
|  | Member
 | | Join Date: 20th January 2003
Posts: 74
Blessings: 91,241
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | Want to chat with William A. Dembski? He's at the forefront of the intelligent design movement. He has some pretty lively message boards which he regularly participates in at his organization: http://www.iscid.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=forum;f=6
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Byepolar - Natural, Nutritional, and Alternative Treatment Solutions to Bipolar Disorder | 
15th April 2003, 08:59 PM
|  | can t spell--can t type 57  | | Join Date: 3rd February 2002 Location: New York state
Posts: 2,604
Blessings: 91,943
Reps: 80 (power: 0) | | | thanks for the link | 
15th April 2003, 09:04 PM
|  | HI 28  | | Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 92,138
Reps: 5,365 (power: 27) | | | Interesting. I did also find it interesting that apparently you arent allowed to link to any other sites to support your arguments.
__________________
Wei wu wei
Green faeries | 
15th April 2003, 09:16 PM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 24th February 2003
Posts: 107
Blessings: 91,038
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | This isn't a forum for challenging or discussing ID. It's just a think-tank for ID people. Apparently you're not allowed to challenge an idea unless an entire page of people have already blessed it with their support.
"All posts on the first page of a thread must be what Edward de Bono calls of the "green hat" type. The earliest posts must be confined to positive construction, re-construction and modification of the ideas in the original post. In other words, on the first page of a thread, participants are required to show that they have an interest in helping the argument to be developed and not just in shooting it down." | 
15th April 2003, 09:26 PM
|  | Legend 37 
| | Join Date: 21st September 2002 Location: United States
Posts: 32,422
Blessings: 39,581
Reps: 295,212,687,427,838,720 (power: 0) | | Today at 08:16 PM gentu said this in Post #4
This isn't a forum for challenging or discussing ID. It's just a think-tank for ID people. Apparently you're not allowed to challenge an idea unless an entire page of people have already blessed it with their support.
"All posts on the first page of a thread must be what Edward de Bono calls of the "green hat" type. The earliest posts must be confined to positive construction, re-construction and modification of the ideas in the original post. In other words, on the first page of a thread, participants are required to show that they have an interest in helping the argument to be developed and not just in shooting it down."
So... you're not allowed to challenge an idea unless a mob has already shown their support; which means you might as well hold up a sign that says "Gang up on me!"
Why am I not surprised?
Last edited by Nathan Poe; 15th April 2003 at 09:36 PM.
| 
15th April 2003, 09:34 PM
|  | HI 28  | | Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 92,138
Reps: 5,365 (power: 27) | | | Nor are you allowed to post links to support any of the arguments you do make.
__________________
Wei wu wei
Green faeries | 
15th April 2003, 09:38 PM
|  | Legend 37 
| | Join Date: 21st September 2002 Location: United States
Posts: 32,422
Blessings: 39,581
Reps: 295,212,687,427,838,720 (power: 0) | | Today at 08:34 PM Arikay said this in Post #6
Nor are you allowed to post links to support any of the arguments you do make.
Great.
First of all, you can't jump into the pool until they gather enough sharks.
Then you have to tie your hands behind your back.
So who wants to go swimming? | 
15th April 2003, 10:44 PM
|  | Junior Member
 | | Join Date: 1st April 2003 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 30
Blessings: 2,093,493
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | I took a look at some of the threads in the forum in question. There seemed to be quite a lot of criticism of Dembski's ideas among the participants, and it did not seem that the moderators were objecting. Therefore, I do not think it is as biased as some of you implied.
That said, I do not think very much of Dembski's arguments. I see no way (and Dembski has provided no way) to determine if complicated information is "specified" without knowing its history... and that is not possible unless you can somehow access the blueprints used by the "designer".
__________________ "Descended from apes! My dear, let us hope it is not so; but if it is, let us hope that it does not become generally known."- Wife of the Bishop of Worcester | 
15th April 2003, 10:46 PM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 24th February 2003
Posts: 107
Blessings: 91,038
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | I think ID is a failure of humans to imagine all the possible the contingencies that can create life. | 
16th April 2003, 02:26 PM
|  | Legend 60  | | Join Date: 22nd October 2002 Location: New York
Posts: 14,418
Blessings: 1,006,785 My Mood
Reps: 407,430,393,920,795,712 (power: 407,430,393,920,819) | | Yesterday at 09:44 PM SplitRock said this in Post #8
That said, I do not think very much of Dembski's arguments. I see no way (and Dembski has provided no way) to determine if complicated information is "specified" without knowing its history... and that is not possible unless you can somehow access the blueprints used by the "designer".
It's worse than that. If you follow Dembski's Explanatory Filter you find that natural selection is an intelligent entity. If you follow Dembski's argument against genetic algorithms, you find out that not even God can create specified complexity, but must "borrow" it. So, according to Dembski, not even intelligent entities can really create. Talk about throwing the baby out with the bathwater! |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |