Origins TheologyForum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums.
Did you know if you actually proved evolution you'd win a Noble Prize? Or whatever the tooth fairy would bring.
Again, you are displaying your ignorance of the subject, since a theory is not something that can be "proved". Evolution and gravity and all these other theories are not things which can be proved, as you have been told over and over. The point is that theories CAN be falsified and those which are not valid ARE falsified. There is every incentive in the scientific community to falsify it. Not only a nobel prize, but fame and fortune of all kinds comes to the scientist who can falsify it. Many, many have tried. No one has succeeded.
Facts are things which can be true or not. Theories explain what the facts mean.
What are you talking about? Evolution is a theory. Theories are not proven. Therefore, nobody would win an award for proving a theory since an attempt to prove a theory would show that the man was ignorant of scientific principles.
I wish Dutchunter would actually present the evidence that falsifies evolution.
__________________ I take a stand on justice, I take a stand on race Gonna take me a TV evangelist and punch him in the face I sing about the hope that’s in me and ask why the poor aren’t fed But if I don’t tow the party line, it’s be better if I were dead
I’m a liberal backslider I’ve been sliding ‘bout ten years
People ask me how I’m doin’ and I confirm all their fears I’m swearing like a trooper, and I’m drinking like a bum
I'm a liberal backslider, and it sure is a lot of fun
I presented a mere tip of the iceberg. You didn't falsify it - you handwaved it with "huh! Three skulls" - which was false, because there were more than three.
Do you even know what "falsify" means?
__________________ I take a stand on justice, I take a stand on race Gonna take me a TV evangelist and punch him in the face I sing about the hope that’s in me and ask why the poor aren’t fed But if I don’t tow the party line, it’s be better if I were dead
I’m a liberal backslider I’ve been sliding ‘bout ten years
People ask me how I’m doin’ and I confirm all their fears I’m swearing like a trooper, and I’m drinking like a bum
I'm a liberal backslider, and it sure is a lot of fun
Yeah...so that's why you responded to my post on that, right? There were THREE that Creationists SUPPOSEDLY couldn't catagorize. I pointed out that wasn't entirely true, and in fact even if they couldn't decide whether to say monkey or man it didn't prove squat as far as them being the missing link. Tip of the iceberg? If you mean when it comes to lies and wishful thinking.
It means a great deal. If they cannot be firmly classed as "ape" or "human", it shows they have features of both - in other words, they are perfectly transitional - exactly as predicted by evolution.
I sell you no lies, and if you make this allegation once more I will report your post, because frankly your sniping and immature arrogance is getting on my tits.
We can go on - if you are willing to debate as an adult. You might want to start with the evidence posted here: http://christianforums.com/t40560
__________________ I take a stand on justice, I take a stand on race Gonna take me a TV evangelist and punch him in the face I sing about the hope that’s in me and ask why the poor aren’t fed But if I don’t tow the party line, it’s be better if I were dead
I’m a liberal backslider I’ve been sliding ‘bout ten years
People ask me how I’m doin’ and I confirm all their fears I’m swearing like a trooper, and I’m drinking like a bum
I'm a liberal backslider, and it sure is a lot of fun
-Martyn Joseph
Last edited by Karl - Liberal Backslider; 13th November 2003 at 09:56 AM.
Linear Mode
