Origins TheologyForum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums.
Troodon....I'm not going to waste my time with someone who goes sentence by sentence and can't even figure out how obvious a difference there is between a theory proven to work- The A-bomb- and one that is still a theory not proven- evolution.
You will not waste your time with a person who categorically deals with your remarks? How am I to respond to you then?
I do get it. Evolution is not fact. There is plenty of evidence that falsifies evolution- and I'm not just talking about frauds. YEC "theory" has not been falsified. Why don't you try to back up the skull- human evolution theory- first?
Do you feel it is intellectually honest to continue to say that there is evidence falsifying evolution when you have not brought up any specific examples of said evidence?
You asked me for evidence supporting evolution; I delivered. You have neither addressed that evidence nor given your own evidence... and yet you feel it is I who am not willing to carry out a proper discussion.
Weak sauce.
__________________
"Creationists are going to distort whatever arguments come up.... Archaeopteryx is half reptile and half bird any way you cut the deck, and so it is a Rosetta stone for evolution, whether it is related to dinosaurs or not. These creationists are confusing an argument about minor details of evolution with the indisputable fact of evolution."
-Dr. Alan Feduccia, in an interview with Discover magazine
Please, if you feel you have evidence falsifying evolution, create a thread designed to discuss that evidence. Without presenting said evidence I will be forced to conclude that you only *think* evolution is falsified when it in fact is not.
"It's cards on the table time"
311 - Give Me a Call
__________________
"Creationists are going to distort whatever arguments come up.... Archaeopteryx is half reptile and half bird any way you cut the deck, and so it is a Rosetta stone for evolution, whether it is related to dinosaurs or not. These creationists are confusing an argument about minor details of evolution with the indisputable fact of evolution."
-Dr. Alan Feduccia, in an interview with Discover magazine
I'm sorry but I am not going to read and refute 56 separate AiG articles for you. Why don't you pick your favorite one and create a thread on it or, better yet, why not take your favorite falsification and put your own little spin on it without just posting someone elses thoughts and work (I have done so on numerous occasions).
BTW...no one can prove the tooth fairy doesn't really exist either.
If you say that evolution has been falsified then why are you comparing it to an unfalsifiable entity? Maybe you should rethink your position on the matter.
__________________
"Creationists are going to distort whatever arguments come up.... Archaeopteryx is half reptile and half bird any way you cut the deck, and so it is a Rosetta stone for evolution, whether it is related to dinosaurs or not. These creationists are confusing an argument about minor details of evolution with the indisputable fact of evolution."
-Dr. Alan Feduccia, in an interview with Discover magazine
We have in this forum presented tons of the scientific evidence supporting evolution and an old earth. All you have to do is read through the threads. You might start with Troodon's thread that he bumped on the fossil record. There is evidence.
Now, in response, you could then show why that evidence does NOT support his proposition. That is how the debate process works.
And I see tons of evidence for the other side. Once again you didn't address the content of my post- which was that somebody else is the one who posted a page with all kinds of links etc so I'd have to weave my way thru it.
Linear Mode
