| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | | 
6th April 2003, 01:55 AM
|  | Angel of Music 28  | | Join Date: 21st February 2003
Posts: 6,429
Blessings: 52,486,574 My Mood
Reps: 164,606,533,243,932,128 (power: 164,606,533,243,947) | | | cDK Theory Interesting theory being worked on now that could account for the age differences between science and theology. Just wondering what you all think?
(from biblephysics.com)
Q: How can Christians believe that God created the universe 6,000 years ago (plus or minus), when there are galaxies millions, even billions of light years away?
<B>A:</B> One of my favorite questions. Research is underway in physics and mathematics that may prove there are actually two timelines: atomic, and dynamic (sometimes referred to as 'orbital'). Atomic time is measured by the motion of the electron around the nucleus of the atom, which, if the cDK (light speed decay) hypothesis is proved correct, has been slowing down since matter was first created. If this is the case, then all processes that depend on the behavior of the atom, including atomic dating, would be affected. The net result would be a much higher age indicated in the analysis of rocks and fossils, than would be indicated using dynamic time -- measured by the orbit of the earth around the sun -- which has not changed.
The cDK hypothesis may not be correct. But it happens to make better sense than any other theory regarding the vast discrepancy in time between the scientific view and the theological view. The cDK hypothesis also solves a majority of other problems that presently plague our best cosmological theories of the origin of the universe. | 
6th April 2003, 03:01 AM
|  | HI 28  | | Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 92,138
Reps: 5,365 (power: 27) | | | Very interesting thoughts. The question though, could this light speed decay have decayed enough to turn 6000 years into a reading of 13.8 billion (for the age of the universe)?
__________________
Wei wu wei
Green faeries | 
6th April 2003, 03:47 AM
|  | HI 28  | | Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 92,138
Reps: 5,365 (power: 27) | | An interesting article I found about C Decay: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/c-decay.html
__________________
Wei wu wei
Green faeries | 
27th August 2011, 09:34 PM
|  | SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE 57 
| | Join Date: 18th June 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 2,126,554
Blessings: 2,934,949,088 My Mood
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,856,908) | | Originally Posted by Jase Interesting theory being worked on now that could account for the age differences between science and theology. Just wondering what you all think?
For lack of a better term, I call it 'embedded age', which I define as 'maturity without history'. Originally Posted by Adam Clarke's Commentary on Genesis 2:5 It appears that God created every thing, not only perfect as it respects its nature, but also in a state of maturity, so that every vegetable production appeared at once in full growth; and this was necessary that man, when he came into being, might find every thing ready for his use. 2 Peter 3:5a For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old,
__________________ GOD SAID IT -- THAT SETTLES IT | 
27th August 2011, 09:43 PM
|  | GAP Ruin-Restoration / Dispensationalism 59 
| | Join Date: 12th February 2008
Posts: 4,948
Blessings: 1,089,318
Reps: 138,187,983,549,267,728 (power: 138,187,983,549,275) | | Originally Posted by Jase atomic, and dynamic
You have one group of people that say the earth has been around the Sun 6,000 times. You have another group that says 4.5 Billion times. They are pretty far apart. As a GAP Creationist all we cover is the last 12,982 years. We do not argue with Science about what happened before that. Life is to short and we do not have enough time to worry about it. Better we spend our time to read and study the Bible.
__________________ The Bible is the greatest of all books;
to study it is the noblest of all pursuits;
to understand it, the highest of all goals. “All religions, arts & sciences are branches of the same tree” Albert Einstein
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" Einstein
"Both Religion and science require a belief in God." Max Planck | 
27th August 2011, 09:48 PM
|  | Only toke me 1 year to work out how to change this
 | | Join Date: 7th January 2010
Posts: 2,189
Blessings: 1,039,467 My Mood
Reps: 74,687,208,637,708,112 (power: 74,687,208,637,713) | | Originally Posted by Jazer You have one group of people that say the earth has been around the Sun 6,000 times. You have another group that says 4.5 Billion times. They are pretty far apart. As a GAP Creationist all we cover is the last 12,982 years. We do not argue with Science about what happened before that. Life is to short and we do not have enough time to worry about it. Better we spend our time to read and study the Bible.
Just checking, what does GAP stand for? | 
13th September 2011, 08:41 PM
| | Captain Awesome! 33  | | Join Date: 28th June 2005
Posts: 3,446
Blessings: 4,982,847
Reps: 59,259,872,948,957,952 (power: 59,259,872,948,967) | | Originally Posted by Jase Interesting theory being worked on now that could account for the age differences between science and theology. Just wondering what you all think?
(from biblephysics.com)
Q: How can Christians believe that God created the universe 6,000 years ago (plus or minus), when there are galaxies millions, even billions of light years away?
<B>A:</B> One of my favorite questions. Research is underway in physics and mathematics that may prove there are actually two timelines: atomic, and dynamic (sometimes referred to as 'orbital'). Atomic time is measured by the motion of the electron around the nucleus of the atom, which, if the cDK (light speed decay) hypothesis is proved correct, has been slowing down since matter was first created. If this is the case, then all processes that depend on the behavior of the atom, including atomic dating, would be affected. The net result would be a much higher age indicated in the analysis of rocks and fossils, than would be indicated using dynamic time -- measured by the orbit of the earth around the sun -- which has not changed.
The cDK hypothesis may not be correct. But it happens to make better sense than any other theory regarding the vast discrepancy in time between the scientific view and the theological view. The cDK hypothesis also solves a majority of other problems that presently plague our best cosmological theories of the origin of the universe.
If the speed of light is decaying, then the rate of decay is so small that any difference between the two as you suggest would be a very short time. Certainly nowhere near the billions of years required for this idea to be correct.
A nice idea, but you have no evidence to support that it can do what you would require it to do.
__________________ Reality has nothing to fear from investigation. | 
17th September 2011, 05:59 AM
| | Newbie
 | | Join Date: 7th March 2010
Posts: 797
Blessings: 1,024,119
Reps: 38,952,600,095,447,392 (power: 38,952,600,095,449) | | Originally Posted by Jase Interesting theory being worked on now that could account for the age differences between science and theology. Just wondering what you all think?
(from biblephysics.com)
Q: How can Christians believe that God created the universe 6,000 years ago (plus or minus), when there are galaxies millions, even billions of light years away?
<B>A:</B> One of my favorite questions. Research is underway in physics and mathematics that may prove there are actually two timelines: atomic, and dynamic (sometimes referred to as 'orbital'). Atomic time is measured by the motion of the electron around the nucleus of the atom, which, if the cDK (light speed decay) hypothesis is proved correct, has been slowing down since matter was first created. If this is the case, then all processes that depend on the behavior of the atom, including atomic dating, would be affected. The net result would be a much higher age indicated in the analysis of rocks and fossils, than would be indicated using dynamic time -- measured by the orbit of the earth around the sun -- which has not changed.
The cDK hypothesis may not be correct. But it happens to make better sense than any other theory regarding the vast discrepancy in time between the scientific view and the theological view. The cDK hypothesis also solves a majority of other problems that presently plague our best cosmological theories of the origin of the universe.
When I go to biblephysiscs .com, I see only this: 美容室 横浜タイトルや説明文には制限が設けてあるため、少ない文字数の中で 美容室 横浜の伝えたいことをすべて表現するのは難しい場合もあります。
美容室 自由が丘への興味を引く工夫をするのと同時に、 美容室 自由が丘説明文の親和性を高める工夫も意識すること大切です。
低価格で現地の美容室 大宮に合わせた、安さばかりが強みの 美容室 大宮は衰退すると警告する。
大切なことは、その前に美容院実体験をしたということで、 美容院を実感できることです。
美容院 梅田は1回の 美容院 梅田で結果を求めるものではありません。
覚えておきたい美容室 渋谷の本質、便利な 美容室 渋谷に関する詳細です。
想像してみよう美容院 大阪の情報がいっぱい詰まったサイト、国内の 美容院 大阪について知りたいならこちら。
私が検討中の美容室 二子玉川見つけました、 美容室 二子玉川ならここで正解!
美容院 川口についての文章の導入部分があって、それを受けて 美容院 川口の話を膨らませます。
美容室 下北沢の専門家にありがちな、予想外の 美容室 下北沢のデメリットを紹介。
美容院 船橋情報源として、 美容院 船橋サイトの利用が更に広がるものと考えられます。
断言できます美容院 青山をサポート、気になる 美容院 青山のことならこちらをご活用ください。
美容院 大宮の目覚しい進歩により、 美容院 大宮の創出に繋がる研究開発が進んでいます。
美容室 川口を目指し、相手の視点に立った活動を推し進め、 美容室 川口と正しい理解を得るための活動を展開しています。
美容院 神奈川を説明文に挿入していない他の 美容院 神奈川もサイトを見てみると意外にたくさんあります。
美容室 天神にとってもユーザーとの関係改善は、来年に予定される 美容室 天神の結果を国際社会に認めさせるための追い風にな
When I let google search the quoted text, the only result I get is on this board.
__________________ MY NEW HERO OF THE MONTH
THE GREEK RIOTING GRANDMA To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
17th September 2011, 06:04 AM
| | Brian Blessed can take a hike
 | | Join Date: 19th November 2009 Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 2,335
Blessings: 3,548,074
Reps: 77,913,002,346,263,744 (power: 77,913,002,346,268) | | | I saw AV bring a thread back from the dead.
I believe! | 
17th September 2011, 06:30 AM
|  | Senior Veteran
 | | Join Date: 21st December 2002 Location: California
Posts: 5,622
Blessings: 1,169,423
Reps: 75,142,064,124,300,000 (power: 75,142,064,124,315) | | Originally Posted by AV1611VET For lack of a better term, I call it 'embedded age', which I define as 'maturity without history'.
Well, to be sure, there is a better term, but it wouldn't get past the censors.
__________________ "A belief which leaves no place for doubt is not a belief; it is a superstition." - Jose Bergamin
"You can't trust an honest man." --- Anonymous
"He does not believe who does not live according to his belief." -- Thomas Fuller
"The fact that the author thinks slowly is not serious, but the fact that he publishes faster than he thinks is inexcusable." -- Wolfgang Pauli
"He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" -- Micah 6:8
"It is because we believe absurdities that we are able to commit atrocities." -- Voltaire "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli "Je ne suis pas marxiste." -- Karl Marx "Faith is believing what you know ain't so."-- Mark Twain
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |