| News & Current Events The forum to discuss things that are happening in the world today. |  | 
14th August 2006, 11:02 AM
|  | Senior Veteran 22  | | Join Date: 8th January 2005 Location: New York
Posts: 3,037
Blessings: 90,792 My Mood
Reps: 18,946,588,070,481,256 (power: 0) | | | US wrong policies make Middle East insecure, unstable FM: US wrong policies make Middle East insecure, unstable Visiting Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki in a meeting with the Algerian Prime Minister Abdelaziz Belkhadem on Monday underlined that the US wrong policies have made the Middle East unstable and insecure. Discussing the regional conditions with Abdelaziz, the foreign minister said that the US policies on Iraq, Afghanistan and the Middle East have failed and its goals have not been achieved. "However, by continuing its wrong policies, the US further contributes to the insecurity and instability of the region," he added. Mottaki said that the Zionist regime's aggression on Lebanon and its continuation for more than a month is in line with the US wrong regional policies.
"They intended to achieve their goals by military operations in Lebanon, destruction of the country and killing of Lebanese people.
But fortunately, Lebanon's heroic resistance prevented them from achieving such goals," he added.
He pointed to the resistance of Hizbollah and Lebanese people to the US policies and Israel's military defeat as a significant opportunity for Islamic and Arab states which should be used in the interests of regional people and countries. For his part, Belkhadem condemned the Zionist regime's savage aggression on Lebanon and said, "Israel's move is based on a preplanned plot. Israelis have never been seeking peace and tranquility in the region."
The Algerian prime minister said, "The enemies intended to create chaos in the region, but did not succeed. They should not be allowed to pursue their aggressive goals under the cover of the United Nations Security Council resolution."
Meanwhile, both sides urged the need to expand bilateral relations in various dimensions.
The two officials also underlined the need for urgent withdrawal of Zionist forces from Lebanese territories in accordance with UN Resolution 1701 passed on Friday. | 
14th August 2006, 12:42 PM
|  | Beaucoup-Diên-Cai-Dāu 52 
| | Join Date: 5th February 2002 Location: By the shores of Gitchee-Goomee
Posts: 15,332
Blessings: 2,192,677
Reps: 1,906,478,794,358,423,808 (power: 1,906,478,794,358,450) | | Methinks the Islamic Republic News Agency is displaying its bias with such terms as "Zionist regime", "Lebanon's heroic resistance", and "the enemies" (i.e., Israel and the US). But then, why would you expect anything different? Discussing the regional conditions with Abdelaziz, the foreign minister said that the US policies on Iraq, Afghanistan and the Middle East have failed and its goals have not been achieved.
Oh? We removed Saddam Insane from power; we removed the Taliban from power; and we have so far prevented another 9/11 from taking place on American soil. We have provided Iraq with a democratic constitutional government, and rebuilt it's infrastructure. Sounds like we're doing pretty well to me. "However, by continuing its wrong policies, the US further contributes to the insecurity and instability of the region," he added.
Oh, naturally. Of course, we'll conveniently ignore the aspects of Iran refusing to cooperate with the UN on any aspect of it's uranium-enrichment program, Syria and Iran supplying weapons of mass destruction to terrorist groups in Lebanon, and the same terrorist groups kidnapping Israeli soldiers and lobbing those weapons into civilian centers in Israel. None of that has anything to do with destabilizing the region---it's all America's fault. Yeah, right. "They intended to achieve their goals by military operations in Lebanon, destruction of the country and killing of Lebanese people.
Gee, and here all this time I thought it was to get their kidnapped soldiers back and pull the fangs of Hezbullah. He pointed to the resistance of Hizbollah and Lebanese people to the US policies and Israel's military defeat as a significant opportunity for Islamic and Arab states which should be used in the interests of regional people and countries.
Meaning, of course, the total destruction of Israel, and the attempted total destruction of the West in general and the US in particular. For his part, Belkhadem condemned the Zionist regime's savage aggression on Lebanon and said, "Israel's move is based on a preplanned plot. Israelis have never been seeking peace and tranquility in the region."
Oh, absolutely. We all know that Israel has staged who know how many intifadas against the Palestinians, they have lobbed rockets into Lebanon, they have ranted and raved for months about "the savage aggression of the Islamofascist regimes", and they have sworn total destruction of the Arab people as a whole. The two officials also underlined the need for urgent withdrawal of Zionist forces from Lebanese territories in accordance with UN Resolution 1701 passed on Friday.
Does this mean that Iran is going to abide by UN resolutions regarding their nuclear program?
Oh, that's right, I forgot. These regimes only use UN resolutions for their own devices....anything the UN has to say about anything else they cheerfully ignore.
Bah. | 
14th August 2006, 12:49 PM
| | Senior Veteran
 | | Join Date: 26th February 2004
Posts: 2,301
Blessings: 72,434 My Mood
Reps: 7,738 (power: 19) | | I smell another " U.S. and Israel = BAD. Rest of the world = Good" thread brewing. | 
14th August 2006, 12:57 PM
|  | | | Join Date: 7th October 2005 Location: A place of peace and neverending eternal happyness and joy in my GOD and lord Jesus Christ!
Posts: 8,090
Blessings: 119,739
Reps: 535,832 (power: 551) | | Originally Posted by Wolseley Methinks the Islamic Republic News Agency is displaying its bias with such terms as "Zionist regime", "Lebanon's heroic resistance", and "the enemies" (i.e., Israel and the US). But then, why would you expect anything different?
Why would you. Wait , dont answer please. Originally Posted by Wolseley Oh? We removed Saddam Insane from power; we removed the Taliban from power; and we have so far prevented another 9/11 from taking place on American soil. We have provided Iraq with a democratic constitutional government, and rebuilt it's infrastructure. Sounds like we're doing pretty well to me.
What? The US PUT Saddam in power. The US FUNDED the Taliban. The US government IS responable for 9/11. Iraq hardly has a democratic anything. As far as a rebuilt infrastructure, thats a joke that nobodys laughing at. Originally Posted by Wolseley Oh, naturally. Of course, we'll conveniently ignore the aspects of Iran refusing to cooperate with the UN on any aspect of it's uranium-enrichment program, Syria and Iran supplying weapons of mass destruction to terrorist groups in Lebanon, and the same terrorist groups kidnapping Israeli soldiers and lobbing those weapons into civilian centers in Israel. None of that has anything to do with destabilizing the region---it's all America's fault. Yeah, right.
I could say the same thing about the US government. You dont see the kidnappings for say, but thats why the US funds groups in other countries to do dirty work. They are very smart. Originally Posted by Wolseley Gee, and here all this time I thought it was to get their kidnapped soldiers back and pull the fangs of Hezbullah.
Nope. Originally Posted by Wolseley Meaning, of course, the total destruction of Israel, and the attempted total destruction of the West in general and the US in particular.
The tools that are in office right now are destroying America. Bleeding it of its resources and economic stability and competivness. Its land and spiritualness. Isolating its citizens with controlled media and events for an evil agenda. Turning its people into brainwashed [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] walking shells of human beings. Originally Posted by Wolseley Does this mean that Iran is going to abide by UN resolutions regarding their nuclear program?
Does it really matter? Originally Posted by Wolseley Oh, that's right, I forgot. These regimes only use UN resolutions for their own devices....anything the UN has to say about anything else they cheerfully ignore.
now you are getting it.
__________________ John 1:10~"He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not." Revelation 22:13~"I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last." † To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. † To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |