| Origins Theology Forum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums. |
 | | 
10th July 2006, 07:20 AM
|  | Senior Member
31     
 | | Join Date: 13th April 2006 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 558
Blessings: 76,617
Reps: 3,394 (power: 9) | | | YECists attempt to dig into sheol
In several recent threads we've seen YECists argue passionately that the Bible is inerrant about structure of our Cosmos, in addition to being inerrant about doctrine, theology and morality.
For example: I believe the Bible is the inerrant word of God. Whatever borderline issues remain a mystery but it doesn't invalidate them. We just don't understand them. How could we understand the mind of God? Some of the Evolutionists here openly blow off the Bible as the fruit of ignorant people. So, it really doesn't matter what the Bible says.
So you really, truly, believe that the Bible teaches us an inerrant picture of the Cosmos? Then surely you must accept that there is a large cavern beneath the earth, called sheol, where the spirits of dead people go. You have no choice.
So here is a challenge: to prove your absolute trust in the Bible's inerrancy, why don't you get out your shovels and start digging until you find sheol? Of course, none of you is actually going to do this. You know as well as we do that sheol is part of the ancient hebrew mythological picture of the universe.
Why then do you insist that the "firmament" and "waters above the heavens" of Genesis 1 are part of reality, rather than mythology? Aren't you being very inconsistent here? Either the Bible is inerrant about cosmology (so sheol is a real place) or it is not inerrant (and thus Genesis 1 cannot possibly be a historical story). Genesis 37:35 All his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him, but he refused to be comforted and said, "No, I shall go down to Sheol to my son, mourning." Thus his father wept for him. Numbers 16:33 So they and all that belonged to them went down alive into Sheol, and the earth closed over them, and they perished from the midst of the assembly. 1 Samuel 2:6 The LORD kills and brings to life;he brings down to Sheol and raises up 1 Kings 2:6 Act therefore according to your wisdom, but do not let his gray head go down to Sheol in peace. Job 7:9 As the cloud fades and vanishes,so he who goes down to Sheol does not come up; Psalm 6:5 For in death there is no remembrance of you;in Sheol who will give you praise? Psalm 49:14 Like sheep they are appointed for Sheol;Death shall be their shepherd,and the upright shall rule over them in the morning.Their form shall be consumed in Sheol, with no place to dwell. Psalm 139:8 If I ascend to heaven, you are there!If I make my bed in Sheol, you are there! Ecclesiastes 9:10 Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with your might, for there is no work or thought or knowledge or wisdom in Sheol, to which you are going. Isaiah 38:10 I said, In the middle of my days I must depart;I am consigned to the gates of Sheolfor the rest of my years. Ezekiel 32:27 And they do not lie with the mighty, the fallen from among the uncircumcised, who went down to Sheol with their weapons of war, whose swords were laid under their heads, and whose iniquities are upon their bones; for the terror of the mighty men was in the land of the living. Hosea 13:14 Shall I ransom them from the power of Sheol?Shall I redeem them from Death?O Death, where are your plagues?O Sheol, where is your sting? Amos 9:2 "If they dig into Sheol,from there shall my hand take them;if they climb up to heaven,from there I will bring them down. |
10th July 2006, 07:44 AM
|  | you are not reading this.
24  
| | Join Date: 18th February 2005 Location: Shah Alam, Selangor
Posts: 8,060
Blessings: 18,378 My Mood 
Reps: 15,461,686,232,085,960 (power: 15,461,686,232,100) | | | And note that in almost all of these references, sheol is directly located as being "downwards", or is contrasted with heaven being located "upwards". Thus Scripture gives a clear geographical location for sheol: it is at the center of the earth.
While we're at it, when was sheol created? Or wasn't it created?
__________________ And who that has understanding will suppose that the first, and second, and third day, and the evening and the morning, existed without a sun, and moon, and stars?
- Origen, 215AD [De Principiis 4.1.16]
... to insist that the rising of the sun is figurative while the rising of the Son is literal is also hypocrisy.
- Geraldus Bouw,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
10th July 2006, 07:57 AM
| | Senior Member
31
| | Join Date: 13th April 2006 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 558
Blessings: 76,617
Reps: 3,394 (power: 9) | | Originally Posted by shernren And note that in almost all of these references, sheol is directly located as being "downwards", or is contrasted with heaven being located "upwards". Thus Scripture gives a clear geographical location for sheol: it is at the center of the earth.
I take it this means heaven is an enormous sphere surrounding the entire universe? Gosh, heaven must be a very big place.
Surface area of heaven's floor = 4 x pi x [radius of universe]^2 |
10th July 2006, 12:26 PM
|  | Senior Veteran
51  
| | Join Date: 20th July 2004 Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,754
Blessings: 67,062
Reps: 17,483,847 (power: 17,493) | | Originally Posted by jereth So here is a challenge: to prove your absolute trust in the Bible's inerrancy, why don't you get out your shovels and start digging until you find sheol? Of course, none of you is actually going to do this. You know as well as we do that sheol is part of the ancient hebrew mythological picture of the universe.
Unlike most evolutionists, I don't need to prove my trust in the Bible's inerrancy. I believe!
__________________
David Cooper: "When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense;therefore, take every word at its primary, ordinary, literal meaning, unless the facts of the context indicate clearly otherwise." |
10th July 2006, 12:47 PM
|  | Senior Veteran
29  
| | Join Date: 6th March 2006
Posts: 6,088
Blessings: 53,546
Reps: 18,889,155,825,852,136 (power: 18,889,155,825,864) | | Originally Posted by vossler Unlike most evolutionists, I don't need to prove my trust in the Bible's inerrancy. I believe!
I respect the fact that when the sky is blue, you take it on faith that it is red "because the Bible says so", so to speak. I can live with that.
What I don't respect are creationists who insist on playing apologetics and twisting science to support their interpretation of the Bible. Science does not support the cosmology of the early Hebrews, so it ticks me off when people pretend it does.
The issue of faith vs. science only arises when we attempt to support one with the other. If we use science to support our faith, then we do not have faith since faith is defined as believing in what is unseen. If we use faith to support our science, then we do not have science since science is only able to test the observable.
__________________
"There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. It is a productive framework for lots of biological research, and it has amazing explanatory power. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution. There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well." -- creation scientist Dr. Todd Wood |
10th July 2006, 02:04 PM
| | Senior Veteran
51
| | Join Date: 20th July 2004 Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,754
Blessings: 67,062
Reps: 17,483,847 (power: 17,493) | | Originally Posted by Mallon What I don't respect are creationists who insist on playing apologetics and twisting science to support their interpretation of the Bible. Science does not support the cosmology of the early Hebrews, so it ticks me off when people pretend it does.
I don't argue specific scientific matters so I'll abstain from that line of thinking. I will say that when anything, whether science or otherwise, isn't supported within or contradicts the Bible then it is science or whatever one is discussing that requires an adjustment, not the Bible. Originally Posted by Mallon The issue of faith vs. science only arises when we attempt to support one with the other. If we use science to support our faith, then we do not have faith since faith is defined as believing in what is unseen. If we use faith to support our science, then we do not have science since science is only able to test the observable.
Good points! I don't see this as a battle of faith vs. science, I see it as a battle of science vs. the Bible. My faith will never to subjected to or held hostage by evolution, science, or anything else man derived and centered. Yet why is it when science contradicts the truth of the Bible do some entertain it as a new and better truth?
__________________
David Cooper: "When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense;therefore, take every word at its primary, ordinary, literal meaning, unless the facts of the context indicate clearly otherwise." |
10th July 2006, 02:33 PM
|  | Voted best Semper Reformada signature ~ 2007
42  
| | Join Date: 23rd March 2003 Location: Texas
Posts: 6,468
Blessings: 171,607
Reps: 172,701 (power: 187) | | Originally Posted by jereth So you really, truly, believe that the Bible teaches us an inerrant picture of the Cosmos?
The Bible is full of error?? Interesting. Why trust ANYTHING in a Bible that is full of error, contains "hebrew mythology" as you say, etc? After all, it might just be full of error about everything else, including salvation. Why trust a God who cannot provide us with a book that is not full of error? Obviously, he has attempted communication, but seems unable to speak clearly.
As far as your citations about Sheol, please provide relevant definitons on the meaning of this Hebrew word so that it can be discussed.
Thanks,... Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory....
Your friendly neighborhood Cordial Calvinist
Woody.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
10th July 2006, 02:37 PM
| | Senior Veteran
29
| | Join Date: 6th March 2006
Posts: 6,088
Blessings: 53,546
Reps: 18,889,155,825,852,136 (power: 18,889,155,825,864) | | Originally Posted by vossler I will say that when anything, whether science or otherwise, isn't supported within or contradicts the Bible then it is science or whatever one is discussing that requires an adjustment, not the Bible.
I don't think we need to adjust either. I would argue that the only thing that needs adjusting is our perspective on the Bible, with an understanding of who's perspective the Scriptures were written from. My faith will never to subjected to or held hostage by evolution, science, or anything else man derived and centered.
I see science as a gift from God, used to help us to understand the world He has blessed us with. Yet why is it when science contradicts the truth of the Bible do some entertain it as a new and better truth?
You're just as guilty as the rest of us, if you believe the earth to be a sphere, the atmosphere to be gaseous, and the sun to be at the centre of our solar system. 
__________________
"There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. It is a productive framework for lots of biological research, and it has amazing explanatory power. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution. There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well." -- creation scientist Dr. Todd Wood
Last edited by Mallon; 10th July 2006 at 02:50 PM.
|
10th July 2006, 02:50 PM
|  | Not just any Willtor... The Mighty Willtor
30   
| | Join Date: 23rd April 2005 Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 7,683
Blessings: 527,448 My Mood 
Reps: 63,932,760,995,062,528 (power: 63,932,760,995,076) | | | Sun at the center of the solar system, not the galaxy.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"Have you guys noticed that the internet is stupid?" --Macrina
|
10th July 2006, 02:51 PM
| | Newbie
| | Join Date: 10th July 2006
Posts: 5
Blessings: 90,365
Reps: 14 (power: 0) | | This article is an interesting read:
www .trueorigin. org/flatearth01.asp
(I can't post links so you'll have to get rid of the spaces) You're just as guilty as the rest of us, if you believe the earth to be a sphere, the atmosphere to be gaseous, and the sun to be at the centre of our galaxy. | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
