Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
Not at all. The "Tranquil Theory" was first suggested by Swedist botanist , Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778). It was promoted by the Scottish minister, John Fleming in 1826.....
Charles Lyell, loved the Fleming's theory because it didn't interfer with that of his own -----Uniformitarian philosphical outlook of nature.....
So Nipper replies with this, to a post that talks souly of Novas production values.
Good job nipper, now we know how you really read peoples posts. Ie. you dont, just like John.
__________________ "the only lie is evolution itself. sometimes you must lie to defeat a lie. as silly as that might sound." - AngryNotice To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"It does not matter if I understand it or not. I just do not agree with it." - JohnR7 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I am not delusional. I would probably outwit a professional psychiatrist," - Knowledge3 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Showing contempt for the Constitution begins when people say they may interpret that document outside it's historic environment. You tell ME just who read what in EVERY public instition openly and without ridicule from BEFORE the radification of the Constitution UNTIL 1963. It was the BIBLE. If that was good enough for George Washinton and Daniel Webster, it is most certainly good enough for me. And if you are silly enough to drag slavery into this issue, I'll have YOU remember that the Constitution needed an Amendment added. So perhaps the DIVIDED Supreme Court should have suggested that before they acted as vigilanties on an issue that had already been decided unanimously in 1897 by the Supreme Court. Show contempt! I'll show contempt for people who have the sick notion that law is all about politics and the latest fashion. Bring something back again and again until one gets the answer they want----that is contempt sir. If they wanted the BIBLE out of Public schools it should have been done legally with an amendment as with slavery and the woman's vote. I cannot tell you that you must believe as I believe, but you have no right to suggest that my beliefs cannot and should not be expressed in any institution of learning as long as there is freedom of speech, expression, and religion in the United States. Anthing less is tyranny in action.
But they DID; it was the FIRST Amendment.
The doctrine of Separation of Church and State, has been there from the very beginning!
I think it is wonderful to see bias opinion in action. And any judge who would prevent something from being expressed based on the opinion that such will cause students to identify with a particular religious belief (as though that really matters) is bias and has demonstrated a contempt for knowledge and the pursuit of truth. He places governmental restrictions above freedom of thought, expression, and religion. The program may provide more proof that the privatization of schools is the only practical solution.....
Actually, this seems like a fallacious escalation of the issue. The judge wasn't restricting free speech, he was following the doctrine of Separation of Church and State by keeping the teaching of religion OUT of public schools. What students identify with had nothing to do with it. Sounds to me like he placed "freedom of thought", above the political agenda of those whom would wish to take it away.
Originally Posted by LittleNipper
AND actually, the evidence proves that nearly all fossils are the direct result of catastrophy. That is exactly what the FLOOD was , and you have no clue as to how many stages that particular catastrophy entailed.
Wow,... that's some new science I've never heard of! Care to explain? Offer any evidence? Name even one reputable scientist whom supports these very VAGUE ideas?
Why do you not accept the reality of what I say, but insist on mocking me. The evidence is slowly being compiled. When one looks at any one thing, that one thing may appear trival; however, when more and more trival things start to fit together
This sounds a bit like, I don't know, miroevolution turning into macroevolution--you know the build up of small things into bigger and bigger things. You couldn't mean that, could you, LN?
__________________ "You know, they make fun of the ones who claimed earth was the center of the uiniverse. It is. It was, and it will be."--Dad
"If you want short, read my posts. I can sum it all up in three words: Evolution is a lie" JohnR7
Dude, you do not have a single, solitary clue what you are talking about. The above is the YEC-apologetic version of the b.s. I used to write in grade school when we had an essay test and I hadn't so much as glanced at the material.
Teddy,
You were not taught anything concerning the history of the non-acceptance of the FLOOD while in a public school. I attended college and I never heard any discourse from any science professor concerning the subject. So please, excuse me if I am rude to you when I say ------- put up or shut up.
You were not taught anything concerning the history of the non-acceptance of the FLOOD while in a public school. I attended college and I never heard any discourse from any science professor concerning the subject. So please, excuse me if I am rude to you when I say ------- put up or shut up.
Re-read what he said.
Reading comprehension is not your enemy. It does not want to hurt you.
__________________ "This isn't right... This isn't even wrong" - Wolfgang Pauli
"Yes, the long war on Christianity. I pray that one day we may live in an America where Christians can worship freely! In broad daylight! Openly wearing the symbols of their religion…. perhaps around their necks? And maybe — dare I dream it? — maybe one day there can be an openly Christian President. Or, perhaps, 43 of them. Consecutively." - Jon Stewart
This sounds a bit like, I don't know, miroevolution turning into macroevolution--you know the build up of small things into bigger and bigger things. You couldn't mean that, could you, LN?
But evolutionists will NOW be the fist to say that evolution is not about becoming more complex. So I suppose now we have another contradiction regarding evolution. Theory, theory, theory-----that is all evolution is. Simpler organisms will not over time become any more complex.
Reading comprehension is not your enemy. It does not want to hurt you.
What he said suggests that he attended a "christian" school and that he has a ax to grind. It does not suggest that any secular course has ever been given on the subject of why the FLOOD is presently ignored by secular institutions. In fact I find the what most secularists say concerning why this and why that are simply hunches that try to fill the void that public education has left unfilled........
Actually, this seems like a fallacious escalation of the issue. The judge wasn't restricting free speech, he was following the doctrine of Separation of Church and State by keeping the teaching of religion OUT of public schools. What students identify with had nothing to do with it. Sounds to me like he placed "freedom of thought", above the political agenda of those whom would wish to take it away.
Wow,... that's some new science I've never heard of! Care to explain? Offer any evidence? Name even one reputable scientist whom supports these very VAGUE ideas?
Doctrine? Sounds rather religious don't you think? No one is talking of setting up a Bible school in public schools and placing the Pope in charge or a Baptist. The reality is that THOUGHT is being deprived to students merely because it emerges from a belief in GOD. This is unacceptable. RELIGION is an exclusive form of worship. Religion is not an understanding that there is or is not a GOD. Satan and the demons know the reality and that does not make them "religious." What makes a "reputable" scientist? One who is honest an thoughtful or one who agrees with you?
Linear Mode
