Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
__________________ You will do me the justice to remember, that I have always strenuously supported the Right of every Man to his own opinion, however different that opinion might be to mine. He who denies to another this right, makes a slave of himself to his present opinion, because he precludes himself the right of changing it.
No, as far as I'm aware CF takes no stance at all on this. If you'd like to add some creationist thread links to this thread, I don't think anyone would complain. No one has bothered to, though.
Evolutionist see the world as only viewed from "God's handiwork, and usually themselves.
Creationist see things as evidence of the Creator.
Some have short tunnel vision, and some open their eyes to see there is more that they know.
Dinosaurs do not discredit anything, unless you are a young earther, of which i am not.
It is indeed sad to see so many so easily lead astray.
It is indeed sad to see so many so easily lead astray.
By following the reformation doctrine of sola scriptura we are led astray?
__________________ You will do me the justice to remember, that I have always strenuously supported the Right of every Man to his own opinion, however different that opinion might be to mine. He who denies to another this right, makes a slave of himself to his present opinion, because he precludes himself the right of changing it.
-- Thomas Paine
Last edited by RichardT; 25th July 2007 at 09:53 PM.
Explain how you see i said that RichardT. Some get confused by believing their interpretation is what the Bible said/meant. The self is had to keep a bay.
Explain how you see i said that RichardT. Some get confused by believing their interpretation is what the Bible said/meant. The self is had to keep a bay.
Sola-Scriptura is not Scriptura sub Scientia
__________________ You will do me the justice to remember, that I have always strenuously supported the Right of every Man to his own opinion, however different that opinion might be to mine. He who denies to another this right, makes a slave of himself to his present opinion, because he precludes himself the right of changing it.
How do you think Martin Luther's Sola Scriptura was doing when he called Copernicus a fool?
Originally Posted by Martin Luther
People gave ear to an upstart astrologer who strove to show that the earth revolves, not the heavens or the firmament, the sun and the moon. Whoever wishes to appear clever must devise some new system, which of all systems is of course the very best. This fool wishes to reverse the entire science of astronomy; but sacred Scripture tells us that Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, and not the earth.
Was Sola Scriptura wrong?
Or was it a case of Interpretatio sub Scientia?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
You are saying we are in conflict, spell out your conflict, Richard T.
Science studies God's handiwork, it does not suppose science takes precedence over God.
Learning of God from His Word (Bible), His Apostles/disciples or from His handiwork does in no way diminish God.
How do you think Martin Luther's Sola Scriptura was doing when he called Copernicus a fool?
Was Sola Scriptura wrong?
Or was it a case of Interpretatio sub Scientia?
He's absolutely right. Sola Scriptura. You didn't know that I was a geocentrist.
__________________ You will do me the justice to remember, that I have always strenuously supported the Right of every Man to his own opinion, however different that opinion might be to mine. He who denies to another this right, makes a slave of himself to his present opinion, because he precludes himself the right of changing it.
So how do you feel about flat earth from a Sola Scriptura point of view? 
Linear Mode
