I am here to be 'put in my Place'

The idea here, for you to “Put me in my Place” as such, a requirement would have been for you to have studied Macro and Micro evolution, as such would have already known about the distinction between the two.

I do not believe in the Myth of Macro evolution, as such, it is not my place to “teach you” about the Myth your supposed to be supporting. I will admit that I have studied it, in both directions, but I have no desire to instruct it.

Read this:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

Feel free to point out the myth part.

(also, feel free to ask any questions you might have).

How much have you read about evolution in order to justify calling it a myth? Have you actually read or studied anything by a qualified biologist?

What what it?

Macroevolution: A term made up by Creationists to try and deny evolution by labeling anything they see as "Micro", and anything we don't see is "macro".

Don't forget that all forms of evolution observed in the future will automatically become microevolution.

I think GWTH's was less "teach me about macroevolution" and more "what do you mean when you use the word."

In any case, "macro" and "micro" describe levels of abstraction; "microevolution" might be the nylon-eating bacteria, "macroevolution" might be the dino-to-bird transition. They are essentially arbitrary "distances" from which one sees common descent. There is no difference in mechanism between the two, and no honest biologist will tell you differently.

The Story that an established life form can via natural reproduction can increase or decrease its DNA structure to become a completely different established life form is fictional.

But the fact that there is a web site that supports Macro Evolution, makes it no less true, then a web site that has support for the seven literal day creation, what is it your seeking to justify with this?

But this was funny: “The worldwide scientific research community from over the past 140 years has discovered that no known hypothesis other than universal common descent can account scientifically for the unity, diversity, and patterns of terrestrial life.”

This was just funny. Talk about an Appeal to Popularity.

The Best part is, Creationism, and ID, Both offer, equally Good, and Equally supported explanations.

The Alien Theory is also a great Theory involving the origins of life on this planet, and is a well supported as evolution, why is that one not here?

There were some great Theories regarding this, why is this “Evolution” the only one that is paid attention to?

Why is the Alien Generation Theory ignored?

Why the need for the earth to be a “Closed System” regarding this? Is the earth the only planet involved in this mess?

No! It is not.
So, it is plausible that other planets, and other life forms could have influenced our planet? Yes it is.

Now, there has been some great new steps in allowing for Alien life to have started our life on this planet, the most recent one being that tiny comets may have not only provided the water on this planet, but also the building blocks of life.

Wow, so, that looks like support that our planet was seeded by Alien DNA, and that looks like a great step into the acceptance of the Alien Theory.

I know why ID and Creationism are not allowed, Apparently there are a great deal of bigots that can’t allow “God” to be involved with their precious Religion of Science.

Lovely how people demand validation of peoples credentials when they say something that disagrees with them, and yet will accept anything by anyone that supports their view.

So that is what they are teaching in the schools these days?

I Guess nothing replaces good scientific study like mindless propaganda and hate speech.

Another Lovely Fallacy, I believe that this is a Hasty Generalization logical fallacy.

This might be a Sweeping Generalization also.

Either way, it is little more then a fictional statement in some vain hope to just drop ridicule at those that disagree with your POV. Pity, I thought there was going to be some more real value to this.

This is a lovely, I believe this Wishful thinking,. maybe a touch of Poisinig the Well, it might even been "Guilt by Assoication.

The Idea here is, you have alerady denounced any one, regardless of credentials, history, skill, or study, who disgarees with you, to be "Dishonist"

Are you wrong?

Yes, You are.

This is little more then a imposed view you posses with no validy to back it up.

Wow, Ok there was a lot responded to.

I am impressed that some many people responded, to some you, thank you very much for your responses.



[/font][/color]

Great site, Been there a few times.

But the fact that there is a web site that supports Macro Evolution, makes it no less true, then a web site that has support for the seven literal day creation, what is it your seeking to justify with this?

But this was funny: “The worldwide scientific research community from over the past 140 years has discovered that no known hypothesis other than universal common descent can account scientifically for the unity, diversity, and patterns of terrestrial life.”

This was just funny. Talk about an Appeal to Popularity.

The Best part is, Creationism, and ID, Both offer, equally Good, and Equally supported explanations.

The Alien Theory is also a great Theory involving the origins of life on this planet, and is a well supported as evolution, why is that one not here?

There were some great Theories regarding this, why is this “Evolution” the only one that is paid attention to?

Why is the Alien Generation Theory ignored?

Why the need for the earth to be a “Closed System” regarding this? Is the earth the only planet involved in this mess?

No! It is not.

So, it is plausible that other planets, and other life forms could have influenced our planet? Yes it is.

Now, there has been some great new steps in allowing for Alien life to have started our life on this planet, the most recent one being that tiny comets may have not only provided the water on this planet, but also the building blocks of life.

Wow, so, that looks like support that our planet was seeded by Alien DNA, and that looks like a great step into the acceptance of the Alien Theory.

I know why ID and Creationism are not allowed, Apparently there are a great deal of bigots that can’t allow “God” to be involved with their precious Religion of Science.

To your second question: have I studied Evolution?

Yes. From a few sides, from the Evolutionist side, The ID Side, and from the Creationist side. And some Fringe Science Sides, All have some good points, some better then others. All have some very weak points. Yes, form real biologist. But not only from Biologist, I am just like everyone else.

Lovely how people demand validation of peoples credentials when they say something that disagrees with them, and yet will accept anything by anyone that supports their view.

But I guess that is just “People” huh?

So that is what they are teaching in the schools these days?

I Guess nothing replaces good scientific study like mindless propaganda and hate speech.

This was a lovely “Poisoning the Well” attack. Lovely, Completely worthless and if the best you have to offer is this, then you really have nothing to offer huh?

Another Lovely Fallacy, I believe that this is a Hasty Generalization logical fallacy.

This might be a Sweeping Generalization also.

Either way, it is little more then a fictional statement in some vain hope to just drop ridicule at those that disagree with your POV. Pity, I thought there was going to be some more real value to this.

This is a lovely, I believe this Wishful thinking,. maybe a touch of Poisinig the Well, it might even been "Guilt by Assoication.

The Idea here is, you have alerady denounced any one, regardless of credentials, history, skill, or study, who disgarees with you, to be "Dishonist"

Are you wrong?

Yes, You are.

This is little more then a imposed view you posses with no validy to back it up.