| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | | 
18th December 2005, 11:32 PM
|  | Senior Veteran 72  | | Join Date: 10th September 2003 Location: usa
Posts: 3,752
Blessings: 116,173
Reps: 222 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by grmorton A sizeable fraction of anthropologists DO believe that there was some input of Neanderthal genes to modern humans. All but one anthropologist (of which I am aware Tattersall) believe that there was some interbreeding.
Yes, Tattersall is renown as a species 'splitter,' and would divide the whole human race into separate species if he could find any evidence of interracial non-fertility. At the opposite end of the neo-Darwinist pingpong table is 'lumper' Milford Wolpoff of Multi-regional Continuity fame who would lump Neanderthal, Heidelberg in with Homo erectus and Modern Man as simple morphological variants of one human race and species. The MRCM was condemned as being implicitly racist by evolutionists themselves after Conrad Coon got his hands on it and racially abused the concept. The inherent racism in all theories of human evolution in and out of Africa was thought to be covered up in the Out of Africa Model, but it is still there for all to see when it is suggested that all modern Asian and Caucasian people originated from African Homo sapiens who theoretically managed to march out of Africa in a genocidal campaign to replace all former local and indigenous human populations throughout Eurasia and the Middle East.
All neo-Darwinist race theorists need to divide Fossil Man up into different 'species' though, in order to create the illusion of a gradual transition from African monkey and ape ancestors. Take Homo erectus away from them and their neo-Darwinist racial theories wouldn't have two erect legs left to stand on. | 
18th December 2005, 11:37 PM
| | Senior Member 24  | | Join Date: 23rd July 2005
Posts: 958
Blessings: 110,347
Reps: 914 (power: 0) | | All neo-Darwinist race theorists need to divide Fossil Man up into different 'species' though, in order to create the illusion of a gradual transition from African monkey and ape ancestors. Take Homo erectus away from them and their neo-Darwinist racial theories wouldn't have two erect legs left to stand on.
Are you advocating the erasure of evidence for the purpose of removing evolution theory's support? You heard it here, everyone. Yes, john, good job. Without its evidence, the theory wouldn't have evidence. You've just completed a syllogism. Do you feel proud?
__________________ The limits of human stupidity are sometimes wonderful and sometimes terrible, usually strange, and invariably amusing. Intelligent design is a shortcut to understanding and closes the door for discovery
- Troglodyte To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
18th December 2005, 11:47 PM
|  | Senior Veteran
 | | Join Date: 21st December 2002 Location: California
Posts: 6,033
Blessings: 1,176,659
Reps: 128,278,070,739,798,352 (power: 128,278,070,739,815) | | Originally Posted by grmorton A sizeable fraction of anthropologists DO believe that there was some input of Neanderthal genes to modern humans. All but one anthropologist (of which I am aware Tattersall) believe that there was some interbreeding.
I know that there are some anthropologists who think neanderthals contributed to the human genome, but recent work seems to have cast that theory into doubt. Still that was mitochondrial evidence and would not rule out descent from a male neanderthal.
I remember reading somewhere (Scientific American?) the idea that blonde hair and blue eyes were neanderthal traits. Also, there was a burial in the caves of Mount Carmel in Israel that showed both modern and neanderthal traits.
__________________ "A belief which leaves no place for doubt is not a belief; it is a superstition." - Jose Bergamin
"You can't trust an honest man." --- Anonymous
"He does not believe who does not live according to his belief." -- Thomas Fuller
"The fact that the author thinks slowly is not serious, but the fact that he publishes faster than he thinks is inexcusable." -- Wolfgang Pauli
"He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" -- Micah 6:8
"It is because we believe absurdities that we are able to commit atrocities." -- Voltaire "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli "Je ne suis pas marxiste." -- Karl Marx "Faith is believing what you know ain't so."-- Mark Twain
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein | 
19th December 2005, 12:02 AM
|  | Senior Veteran 72  | | Join Date: 10th September 2003 Location: usa
Posts: 3,752
Blessings: 116,173
Reps: 222 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Caphi The thing is, though, John's gone overboard with the business by claiming that, in fact, Neanderthal are singularly ancestral to him and indeed Caucasians in general, and that early Homo species are ancestral to Negroids only. One wonders what he names as ancestor to Orientals.
I don't claim that "early Homo species are ancestral to Negroids only," and never have. You misinterpret my statements and project your own racial misunderstandings and beliefs into the discussion. My postion is that Neanderthal Man was sapient from the beginning and is ancestral to all Homo sapiens, whether in Africa or any other part of the world. You start out with small brained hominids in Africa evolving into larger brained Homo sapiens throughout the world whereas I start with big-brained Neanderthal descendents of Noah who metamorphized into Heidleberg Man who in turn was ancestral to Modern Man. Actually, let's. John, if memory serves, a century or so ago there were five races identified - the white race or Caucasians, the black race or Negroids, the red race (aboriginal Americans), the Yellow race (Orientals today), and the brown race (Malaysian and Oceanic people).
Really, and who was doing the identifying if not scientific race theorists? So if Neanderthal are ancestors to Caucasians and Homo species to Negroids, as you claim, who would you theorize (in a loose sense of the world) as transforming into the remaining three races?
Your question is as pathetic as your false assumption that I claim Homo species are ancestral to "Negroids" is. The modern Neanderthal theory of human descent from Noah's three sons doesn't divide humanity up into either races or species, but sees the ancestors of modern men and women in various genealogical lines of human descent from three Neanderthal families. | 
19th December 2005, 12:07 AM
|  | Senior Veteran 72  | | Join Date: 10th September 2003 Location: usa
Posts: 3,752
Blessings: 116,173
Reps: 222 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Caphi Well, john, I can't speak for friend Nathan, but personally:
- I have learned a great deal about the world. Not only have I been prompted to educate myself not only about evolution but about other sciences and history, but I also learned that I have led a rather sheltered life in terms of the viewpoints of other people.
- I have gained a vast increase of capability to understand and accept other viewpoints and to share my ideas and listen to the ideas of others.
- I have my own increase of knowledge, a greater experience of my world, and a lot of hours which might otherwise have been wasted to show for my time here.
Sniff.
Yes, Caphi, you exhibit a good educational background in your posts and show a remarkable degree of intelligence and conversational ability for someone who believes they are descended from monkey and ape ancestors. Not like some other posters that neither of us can speak for. Cough. | 
19th December 2005, 12:17 AM
|  | Senior Veteran 72  | | Join Date: 10th September 2003 Location: usa
Posts: 3,752
Blessings: 116,173
Reps: 222 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Caphi [/size][/font]
Are you advocating the erasure of evidence for the purpose of removing evolution theory's support? You heard it here, everyone. Yes, john, good job. Without its evidence, the theory wouldn't have evidence. You've just completed a syllogism. Do you feel proud?
Yes, get rid of all those Homo erectus fossils. Burn 'em or something. Re-bury them! Cremate them! After all, they are just the dusty remains of some poor neo-Darwinst 'species' in Asia that was originally obliterated when superior Homo sapiens marched out of Africa and replaced those old erect Homos by driving them into mass graves and final extinction. The modern Out of Africa Model is the perfect solution for getting rid of a whole species of humans even if they do leave some fossil evidence of their 1.5 million year existance on the planet before those sapiens got invented. | 
19th December 2005, 12:22 AM
|  | Senior Veteran 72  | | Join Date: 10th September 2003 Location: usa
Posts: 3,752
Blessings: 116,173
Reps: 222 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Gracchus I know that there are some anthropologists who think neanderthals contributed to the human genome, but recent work seems to have cast that theory into doubt. Still that was mitochondrial evidence and would not rule out descent from a male neanderthal.
I remember reading somewhere (Scientific American?) the idea that blonde hair and blue eyes were neanderthal traits. Also, there was a burial in the caves of Mount Carmel in Israel that showed both modern and neanderthal traits. 
Good move, Gracchus. Nothing like keeping an open mind when discussing blue-eyed and blond-haired descendents of a certain ancestor of the ancient Israelites. I'll wave back to that. | 
19th December 2005, 07:17 AM
|  | Legend 39 
| | Join Date: 21st September 2002 Location: United States
Posts: 32,420
Blessings: 51,147
Reps: 295,212,687,427,838,720 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by john crawford Yes, get rid of all those Homo erectus fossils. Burn 'em or something. Re-bury them! Cremate them! After all, they are just the dusty remains of some poor neo-Darwinst 'species' in Asia that was originally obliterated when superior Homo sapiens marched out of Africa and replaced those old erect Homos by driving them into mass graves and final extinction. The modern Out of Africa Model is the perfect solution for getting rid of a whole species of humans even if they do leave some fossil evidence of their 1.5 million year existance on the planet before those sapiens got invented.
Crawford science:
1: Concoct an idea with plenty of emotional buzzwords such as "neo-darwinist racism"
2: Destroy any evidence which falsifies said idea.
Sniff. | 
19th December 2005, 07:21 AM
|  | Ace2whoa - resident geneticist 31  | | Join Date: 21st September 2004 Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,596
Blessings: 103,224
Reps: 9,921 (power: 20) | | | John, you are on my ignore list so I only see what people quote.
But seriously, you need help.
__________________ "This isn't right... This isn't even wrong" - Wolfgang Pauli "Yes, the long war on Christianity. I pray that one day we may live in an America where Christians can worship freely! In broad daylight! Openly wearing the symbols of their religion…. perhaps around their necks? And maybe — dare I dream it? — maybe one day there can be an openly Christian President. Or, perhaps, 43 of them. Consecutively." - Jon Stewart | 
19th December 2005, 02:54 PM
| | Senior Member 24  | | Join Date: 23rd July 2005
Posts: 958
Blessings: 110,347
Reps: 914 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by john crawford I don't claim that "early Homo species are ancestral to Negroids only," and never have. You misinterpret my statements and project your own racial misunderstandings and beliefs into the discussion. My postion is that Neanderthal Man was sapient from the beginning and is ancestral to all Homo sapiens, whether in Africa or any other part of the world. You start out with small brained hominids in Africa evolving into larger brained Homo sapiens throughout the world whereas I start with big-brained Neanderthal descendents of Noah who metamorphized into Heidleberg Man who in turn was ancestral to Modern Man.
Is that so? What was it... something like "Neo-Darwinist race theorists, by calling everyone H. sapiens sapiens, attribute to us white people an ancestry which can only be claimed by African people." Something along those lines. Now what does that mean if not "African people only descended from Homo species"? Really, and who was doing the identifying if not scientific race theorists?
You. Status quo theorizes that all humans descended from hominids who happened to live in Africa. You claim that only Africans descended from these hominds and that whites descended from European Neanderthals. Your question is as pathetic as your false assumption that I claim Homo species are ancestral to "Negroids" is. The modern Neanderthal theory of human descent from Noah's three sons doesn't divide humanity up into either races or species, but sees the ancestors of modern men and women in various genealogical lines of human descent from three Neanderthal families.
But weren't you recently decrying the theory that all humans emerged from African hominids as "racist"? And now you yourself are supporting a theory which gives all humans as descending from Mediterranean Neanderthals. Doesn't that make you racist as well?
__________________ The limits of human stupidity are sometimes wonderful and sometimes terrible, usually strange, and invariably amusing. Intelligent design is a shortcut to understanding and closes the door for discovery
- Troglodyte To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |