| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |
 | | 
29th September 2002, 12:55 AM
| | Junior Member
| | Join Date: 8th August 2002
Posts: 28
Blessings: 90,887
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | Shroud of Turin proven genuine by REAL science
Most people probably heard by now all kinds of stories about Shroud of Turin being fake, etc. Well, once again we have been fooled by our biased media. See what the REAL scientists have discovered. Also, see how the other "scientist" faked the results to support their atheistic believes.
<DIV>You have to download this movie clip on your hard disk. it's about 14 MB</DIV>
<DIV>
Just Right click and choose Save As ... </DIV>
<DIV> http://www.wtlzone.com/pictures/shroud.wmv</DIV>
Last edited by RCC; 29th September 2002 at 01:02 AM.
|
29th September 2002, 02:12 AM
|  | Bunny Infidel
36   
 | | Join Date: 5th August 2002 Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,016
Blessings: 91,964
Reps: 149 (power: 0) | | | Can you paraphrase? Some of us ARE on dialup, you know.
And by the way, does the phrase "REAL scientists" mean those you agree with?
__________________
Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone. — Ayn Rand |
29th September 2002, 02:24 AM
|  | Senior Veteran
39   
| | Join Date: 17th May 2002 Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 2,526
Blessings: 68,089 My Mood 
Reps: 1,795,728 (power: 1,807) | | | Hazy, same old arguments with a nice dose of "If you are not Catholic you are going to burn in hell" thrown in at the end for kicks.
There was no new evidence shown and no new arguments, over all I found it a sad waste of my time and bandwidth. |
29th September 2002, 10:26 AM
| | Junior Member
| | Join Date: 8th August 2002
Posts: 28
Blessings: 90,887
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | Basically it proves that the C14 test they did was totally flawed, plus there is strong evidence that the whole thing was a delibaerate fraud. They tried really hard to disprove it and they did a really good job.
Plus even if they didn't, C14 dating is a joke. It ususally doesn't work with samples with known age, so whu should it work with unknown age ? I think Vatican should never have allowed that test. |
29th September 2002, 12:40 PM
|  | Learn physics
 
| | Join Date: 23rd September 2002 Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 4,730
Blessings: 91,569
Reps: 61 (power: 0) | | | lol this hole post is a joke.
__________________
"We are just an advanced breed of monkeys on a minor planet of a very average star. But we can understand the Universe. That makes us something very special."
Stephen W. Hawking
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
29th September 2002, 02:17 PM
| | Regular Member
46 
| | Join Date: 1st September 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 239
Blessings: 91,222
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | c-14 dating is actually pretty accurate in many cases. Not only that, but the overwhelming consensus of even very sonservative Christian scientists has been that the shroud is a forgery. Doesn't absolutely prove it's a forgery, but casts enough reasonable doubt to where I don't put any faith in it.
Chris |
29th September 2002, 02:19 PM
| | Regular Member
46
| | Join Date: 1st September 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 239
Blessings: 91,222
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | Originally posted by RCC
Basically it proves that the C14 test they did was totally flawed, plus there is strong evidence that the whole thing was a delibaerate fraud. They tried really hard to disprove it and they did a really good job.
Plus even if they didn't, C14 dating is a joke. It ususally doesn't work with samples with known age, so whu should it work with unknown age ? I think Vatican should never have allowed that test.  And your going to prove C-14 dating false...How?? With what hard scientific evidence?
Chris  |
29th September 2002, 03:01 PM
| | Junior Member
| | Join Date: 8th August 2002
Posts: 28
Blessings: 90,887
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | C-14 is based on number of fauly assumption:
1. The rate of C-14 decay has always been the same
2. The amount of C-14 in the atmosphere has always been the same (not true)
Many evolutionist say that there is absolutely no reliable dating method.
They did many tests with samples of known age and the results were very wrong. So if they base their claim that the Shroud of Turin is a fake on C-14 dating then that's not a proof to me. If it's a fake how come there is no paint on it ? |
29th September 2002, 03:31 PM
| | Senior Veteran
39
| | Join Date: 17th May 2002 Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 2,526
Blessings: 68,089 My Mood
Reps: 1,795,728 (power: 1,807) | | | RCC
Unlike what they said in your video, C14 dating does not assume either if those things. Infact there are many correcting factors because we know that C14 levels were different in the past.
It would help if you learned a little bit about C14 dating before claiming it to be false. |
29th September 2002, 05:15 PM
| | Regular Member
46
| | Join Date: 1st September 2002 Location: Ohio
Posts: 239
Blessings: 91,222
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | Originally posted by RCC
C-14 is based on number of fauly assumption:
1. The rate of C-14 decay has always been the same
Nuclear decay rates are very stable. With what evidence are you claiming that the decay rate has changed?
Chris | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
