Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
Originally posted by s0uljah since the image was created by a radiation burn when Jesus was raised from the dead.
1. Why would Jesus raising from the dead leave a radiation burn?
2. What evidence do you have that the markings on the shroud are the result of radiation burn? Reference to scientific papers appreciated.
__________________ ~~RvFvS~~ Evolution: The change of properties of populations of organisms over time. Microevolution: Evolution apparent within species. Macroevolution: Evolution apparent between species.
The accuracy of science cannot be determined by emotion, philosophy, politics, or religion.
Originally posted by TheBear Signs or no signs, prove to me that the shroud is 2000 years old. Period.
Prove to me that it isn't.
The only way I have of reliably dating it is to look at the pollens, the type of linen fibers, and the history of the Shroud. It all points to AD 33
C14 has been shown to be false in the dating of this type of material.
I went to The Glyph's website yesterday when you first mentioned it. They have the table of contents of their past issues. Mattingly's & Garza-Vermes's is not there as far as I can tell. Kilmon apparently published articles there, but M & G-V didn't.
I want to know where M & G-V published.
__________________ ~~RvFvS~~ Evolution: The change of properties of populations of organisms over time. Microevolution: Evolution apparent within species. Macroevolution: Evolution apparent between species.
The accuracy of science cannot be determined by emotion, philosophy, politics, or religion.
Originally posted by s0uljah Prove to me that it isn't.
The only way I have of reliably dating it is to look at the pollens, the type of linen fibers, and the history of the Shroud. It all points to AD 33
Scientific reference please.
C14 has been shown to be false in the dating of this type of material.
I'll grant that it has been shown to have issues with mummys. The shroud of turin is not a mummy though.
Please, produce the scientific reference where the 1988/9 dating of the shroud is proved to be adversely affected by microbes and fire. Is that too much to ask?
__________________ ~~RvFvS~~ Evolution: The change of properties of populations of organisms over time. Microevolution: Evolution apparent within species. Macroevolution: Evolution apparent between species.
The accuracy of science cannot be determined by emotion, philosophy, politics, or religion.
Originally posted by RufusAtticus I went to The Glyph's website yesterday when you first mentioned it. They have the table of contents of their past issues. Mattingly's & Garza-Vermes's is not there as far as I can tell. Kilmon apparently published articles there, but M & G-V didn't.
Linear Mode
