| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |
 | | 
8th November 2005, 04:50 AM
|  | WinAce > cdesign proponentsists
32    
 | | Join Date: 24th June 2003 Location: Chiark
Posts: 18,443
Blessings: 125,873
Reps: 16,712 (power: 43) | | | Modern day Transitional Form found.
A modern day transitional form has been found between a "creationist" book and an "intelligent design" book: here is the original "creationist document" 
and here is the transitional form: 
containing the new "design proponents" but just enough of the old word "creationists" to make it clear what has been substituted.
what do the "cdesign proponentsists" ´have to say I wonder?
__________________
MSci MSc ARCS DIC PhD..... yes, I am bragging. |
8th November 2005, 04:57 AM
| | Senior Contributor
 
| | Join Date: 18th June 2005
Posts: 10,750
Blessings: 108,221
Reps: 12,098,800,393,032 (power: 12,098,800,410) | | | LOL
I think they suffer from carpel “ist” syndrome.
The insertion error is obvious, but they sure are fond of their ists. |
8th November 2005, 11:26 AM
|  | A dude playin' a dude disgused as another dude
34
| | Join Date: 18th July 2005 Location: Deep underground
Posts: 6,568
Blessings: 92,676 My Mood 
Reps: 36,217,039 (power: 36,230) | | | I guess I will have to learn how to spell "cdesign proponentsists" because from now on, "cdesign proponentsists" is the new IDists.
__________________ "Ray, if someone asks you if you're a god you say yes!" ~ Winston Zeddemore
I am Jack's total lack of god-belief.
|
8th November 2005, 01:36 PM
| | Senior Veteran
32 
| | Join Date: 22nd March 2004
Posts: 2,105
Blessings: 92,503
Reps: 3,260 (power: 13) | | | |
8th November 2005, 01:42 PM
|  | Soldier of Knowledge
28    
| | Join Date: 18th January 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,720
Blessings: 59,511
Reps: 18,604,695,596,698 (power: 18,604,695,606) | | | Is the “c” at the beginning of the word “design” considered a vestigial structure?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
8th November 2005, 02:41 PM
|  | Veteran
39   
| | Join Date: 10th June 2005 Location: OHIO. home of THE Ohio State Buckeyes
Posts: 2,741
Blessings: 67,726
Reps: 18,485,917,141,881,588 (power: 18,485,917,141,890) | | Originally Posted by Jet Black A modern day transitional form has been found between a "creationist" book and an "intelligent design" book: here is the original "creationist document"
and here is the transitional form:
containing the new "design proponents" but just enough of the old word "creationists" to make it clear what has been substituted.
what do the "cdesign proponentsists" ´have to say I wonder?
stupid realy not like evolutionist never get things wrong and change there ideas. it just natural to make a point you think is true when the evidence suggest it to be, then later when new evidence comes up you change it. evolutionist dont do this. i believe they have. |
8th November 2005, 02:47 PM
|  | Titleless
31   
| | Join Date: 28th April 2004 Location: Maastricht
Posts: 9,755
Blessings: 88,870
Reps: 9,274,249 (power: 9,291) | | Originally Posted by Schroeder stupid realy not like evolutionist never get things wrong and change there ideas. it just natural to make a point you think is true when the evidence suggest it to be, then later when new evidence comes up you change it. evolutionist dont do this. i believe they have.
By not changing your entire argument, but just replacing one word? Your stretching credulity here to a breaking point Schroeder.
__________________ Tom 'What luck for rulers, that men do not think.' -Ascribed to Adolf Hitler- `Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.' -Through the Looking Glas by Lewis Caroll- Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. --Aaron Levenstein |
8th November 2005, 02:48 PM
| | A dude playin' a dude disgused as another dude
34
| | Join Date: 18th July 2005 Location: Deep underground
Posts: 6,568
Blessings: 92,676 My Mood
Reps: 36,217,039 (power: 36,230) | | Originally Posted by Schroeder stupid realy not like evolutionist never get things wrong and change there ideas. it just natural to make a point you think is true when the evidence suggest it to be, then later when new evidence comes up you change it. evolutionist dont do this. i believe they have.
Sweet Jebus. The point of the OP is entering Jupiter's orbit, it went so far over your head.
__________________ "Ray, if someone asks you if you're a god you say yes!" ~ Winston Zeddemore
I am Jack's total lack of god-belief.
|
8th November 2005, 05:17 PM
| | Back in Town
26  
| | Join Date: 5th May 2005
Posts: 9,324
Blessings: 194,598
Reps: 70,872 (power: 86) | | Ah, yes, and we have solid evidence of vestigial characters in use here, as seen where the extra "c" and "ists" still remain in the document even though they no longer serve any mechanical purpose. I am sure that, in time, these vestigial characters will be phased out, but for now they remain, a testament to a document that was. Originally Posted by Schroeder stupid realy not like evolutionist never get things wrong and change there ideas. it just natural to make a point you think is true when the evidence suggest it to be, then later when new evidence comes up you change it. evolutionist dont do this. i believe they have.
Sorry, I couldn't read or make sense of this. There is a spellchecker built in. You should probably consider using it next time. |
8th November 2005, 05:26 PM
|  | Contributor
| | Join Date: 26th August 2003
Posts: 9,012
Blessings: 1,096,896
Reps: 84,929,301,057,186,064 (power: 84,929,301,057,204) | | Originally Posted by Schroeder stupid realy not like evolutionist never get things wrong and change there ideas. it just natural to make a point you think is true when the evidence suggest it to be, then later when new evidence comes up you change it. evolutionist dont do this. i believe they have.
It was changed so that it would look less like creationism and more like science. It had nothing to do with new data. It has everything to do with getting creationism into public schools by disguising it.
__________________
“Because they know not the forces of nature, and in order that they may have comrades in their ignorance, they suffer not that others should search out anything, and would have us believe like rustics and ask no reason...But we ask in all things a reason must be sought.” --William of Conches (c. 1090 – after 1154) | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
