Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
I mentioned to a friend of mine that Linus Torvalds supposedly said something about evolution and parallelism. My friend's response was very amusing...
If Linus Torvalds believes the Neo-Darwinian Theory of Evolution, I have a challenge for him: insert random "point mutations" [in] future releases of Linux and see what happens.
It could be done at the source level, but it would be more interesting at the binary level (and ignore the possibility of recompiling for now). In each copy of the Linux executable released for the major distributions, randomly change, say, every 10,000th bit (so that the random changes are different for each copy).
According to the theory of evolution, some changes should improve the operating system, and hence it should increase the user demand for it. The users of that version should then proliferate copies of it for their friends, and eventually that version should become dominant.
__________________ If you lived here you'd be home by now.
#1. All Linux users would be willing to reinstall Linux just to see evolution work.
#2. There's a great battle for survival where superior Linux distributions kill off the inferior ones. Which probably means that users would have to choose between tens of thousands of distributions, each with their own features, just to play npetreley's little game.
#3. The superior Linux distributions could mate and create offspring with mutations.
#4. The offspring repeats step #2.
Yes, it's funny how ridiculous assumptions gives ridiculous conclusions.
I've not heard of one, but I have seen them used for everything from designing jet engines to supervising warehouse space for a whiskey manufacturer.
You keep talking about computer programs that use so-called genetic algorithms to design OTHER things for which you have standards. What I'd love to see you do is literally introduce bit-flip mutations into your binaries and see how well they run.
__________________ If you lived here you'd be home by now.
Nope. To mimic evolution the way Nick wants, you'd merely have to write programs were the fitness function is "they run" and "they reproduce".
You get viruses that each your hard drive alive.
Nick's objection to GA's is akin to claiming you can't discuss ice freezing in the Arctic using tests run on water in your freezer. It's an objection to any sort of experiment or model.