| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | | 
11th July 2002, 05:29 PM
|  | Science Officer
 | | Join Date: 14th May 2002 Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 980
Blessings: 91,497
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | The Bible supports Science Nick offered the following Bible quote: Romans 1:20-22
20 For ever since the creation of the world His invisible nature and attributes, that is, His eternal power and divinity, have been made intelligible and clearly discernible in and through the things that have been made. So [men] are without excuse
So here the Bible is clearly telling us that God's nature has been made "intelligible and clearly discernible" in nature. In other words, what we can observe and experience in nature is evidence of the true nature of God.
If nature appears to be very old, then who are we to conclude that God and the Earth itself are not very old?
If living things clearly appear to have evolved, then who are we to say that evolution was not a part of God's creative nature?
The Bible encourages us to accept what we see in nature as evidence of God's true nature, and goes on to admonish those who deny it: But instead they became futile and godless in their thinking and their senseless minds were darkened.
Claiming to be wise, they became fools. | 
11th July 2002, 05:31 PM
|  | Voiced Bilabial Spirant 33  | | Join Date: 11th February 2002 Location: GA
Posts: 1,092
Blessings: 71,015
Reps: 803 (power: 0) | | | Thoughtful, interesting post.
__________________ "My soul with truth clothe all about,/And I shall question free:/The man that feareth, Lord, to doubt,/In that fear doubteth thee." George MacDonald "But there is one argument which we should beware of using for either position [the Fundamentalists' view of the Bible and the Roman Catholics' view of the Church]: God must have done what is best, this is best, therefore God has done this." C. S. Lewis | 
12th July 2002, 10:25 AM
|  | Science Officer
 | | Join Date: 14th May 2002 Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 980
Blessings: 91,497
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | I had hoped to receive more commentary on this post. Anyone? | 
12th July 2002, 10:50 AM
| | Fish out of water
 | | Join Date: 7th May 2002 Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,726
Blessings: 92,632
Reps: 25 (power: 0) | | Originally posted by LiveFreeOrDie I had hoped to receive more commentary on this post. Anyone?
Two opposable thumbs up! | 
12th July 2002, 11:30 AM
|  | Christian Believer
 | | Join Date: 1st July 2002
Posts: 37
Blessings: 90,976
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | This, as most things, depends on how you look at things. Not how you look at the Bible, mind you, but how you look at the world.
I clearly see God in everything I look at. I clearly see a world that He made.
But I don't clearly see evolution.
I see a world that appears old, and the Bible said that everything that He made was mature...that includes this planet.
David | 
12th July 2002, 01:17 PM
|  | I think, therefore I am... confused 37  | | Join Date: 9th July 2002 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 569
Blessings: 1,003 My Mood
Reps: 71,783,872,170,586,400 (power: 71,783,872,170,596) | | | I would agree that the bible supports science, but evolution is not science, it's philosophy.
__________________ Mat 11:25 At that time Jesus answered and said, "I thank You, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that You have hidden these things from the wise and prudent and have revealed them to babes. | 
12th July 2002, 01:27 PM
| | Senior Member
 | | Join Date: 29th May 2002
Posts: 572
Blessings: 91,239
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | The problem is there isn't conclusive proof of evolution, and if the fossil record is as weak as evolutionists now claim, there may never be conclusive evidence of evolutionary theory. Evolution may have occurred, or it may not have, or it could be some things evolved and some were created via special creation, with God doing both. At this point, science doe snot have the answer, and to pretend it does is to ignore the holes in the data. | 
12th July 2002, 01:41 PM
| | Fish out of water
 | | Join Date: 7th May 2002 Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,726
Blessings: 92,632
Reps: 25 (power: 0) | | | Randman, The fossil record does support evolution, and evolution is required to explain the trends in it, but that is only a fragment of the evidence for evolution. Even if we never find another fossil, common descent has already been supported beyond any kind of reasonable, scientific doubt. True that word of this has been slow reaching some parts.
__________________ Man should no more get tired of using his brain--if he is using it properly--than a fish should get tired of water.
- Colin Wilson | 
12th July 2002, 01:44 PM
|  | Science Officer
 | | Join Date: 14th May 2002 Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 980
Blessings: 91,497
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | Originally posted by food4thought I would agree that the bible supports science, but evolution is not science, it's philosophy.
Funny, everyone except certain fundamentalist Christians seems to think it's science. Care to explain what you mean by your statement? | 
12th July 2002, 02:48 PM
| | Newbie
 | | Join Date: 12th July 2002
Posts: 5
Blessings: 90,960
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | Quote
"If nature appears to be very old, then who are we to conclude that God and the Earth itself are not very old? "
Auhhh.... Because your Bible says its not. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |