| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |
 | | 
25th June 2005, 11:41 PM
|  | Stop QWERTYface!
43      
 | | Join Date: 25th December 2003 Location: Dallas
Posts: 18,112
Blessings: 4,856
Reps: 93,489,950,375,983,120 (power: 93,489,950,376,010) | | | Vestigials 101
The common Creationist straw man of vestigial characterists are that they are organs or structures that have lost all function, though they had function in progenator species. I just thought of a short list of simple things our bodies do that more accurately represent vestigial (diminished or changed function, not functionless) remains of our ancestral past.
- Prehensile toes. I, and I'm sure most people can pick things up between their toes. I have a bad back and try not to squat to save wear on my knees, so if I'm bare footed and need to pick something up, my feet do the work.
- Wiggling ears. I can wiggle my ears. We all are physically able to, but you just need to learn to flex the right muscles. This is a more ancient vestigial from prehensile toes going probably back to our Consestor with pro-simians or earlier.
- Flaring nostrils. Oddly enough, this one evidences Aquatic Ape theory as much as it does a functional vestige of times when our Consestors used their sense of smell and needed to open their nostrils wide and get as much scent in as possible.
- Goosebumps. I think everyone knows why we get these and how they're a vestige of when our ancestors had more body hair.
These seemingly inconsequential vestigial functions might not be as glamorous as the coccyx or appendix, but they point inevitably with the rest of the mountains of evidence, in favor of evolution and common ancestry.
__________________
(The Library of Alexandria) questioned the permanence of the stars, but did not question the justice of slavery - Carl Sagan in Cosmos |
26th June 2005, 12:40 AM
|  | bel esprit
29  
| | Join Date: 28th October 2003 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 11,802
Blessings: 103,681
Reps: 45,671 (power: 65) | | | Don't forget that pink stuff in the corner of people's eyes (I don't know what it's called) - that's the vestige of a nictating membrane.
__________________
Veritas omnia vincit.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
26th June 2005, 12:52 AM
|  | Draft the chickenhawks
| | Join Date: 28th November 2004
Posts: 4,574
Blessings: 78,509
Reps: 184,423 (power: 196) | | Originally Posted by Hydra009 Don't forget that pink stuff in the corner of people's eyes (I don't know what it's called) - that's the vestige of a nictating membrane.
That's one thing I wish I still had. |
26th June 2005, 01:02 AM
|  | The cake is a lie.
31  
| | Join Date: 11th May 2004 Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,547
Blessings: 91,149
Reps: 27,572 (power: 39) | | Originally Posted by Hydra009 Don't forget that pink stuff in the corner of people's eyes (I don't know what it's called) - that's the vestige of a nictating membrane.
Totally OT, please forgive:
I wonder if we could artificially activate something to get that back, I was thinking over breakfast this morning, that I would really really like a nictating membrane. Especially the kind that seals have.
__________________ Look at me still talking when there's science to do! |
26th June 2005, 01:47 AM
|  | Eat your Wheaties and know your logical fallacies.
5 
| | Join Date: 20th December 2003 Location: $1 reject store
Posts: 2,091
Blessings: 65,053
Reps: 2,781,141 (power: 2,792) | | This is also slightly off topic.
How are dewclaws vestigal? |
26th June 2005, 02:27 AM
|  | Bane of Marbles
27 
| | Join Date: 23rd April 2005 Location: I am the monster that crawl around in your vents and makes them rattle.
Posts: 1,204
Blessings: 90,939
Reps: 2,577 (power: 0) | | | It's too bad that Average Joe doesn't already know this, shame on U.S. education. |
26th June 2005, 11:50 AM
|  | Senior Veteran
32  
| | Join Date: 23rd March 2004
Posts: 2,101
Blessings: 99,657
Reps: 2,414 (power: 12) | | | One question: Does hair count as vestigal, since it does not seem to do much except social functions, including sexual attraction?
__________________
In war there's no time to teach or learn Zen
carry a strong stick
bash your attackers
- Ikkyu Sojun, 15th Century Zen Master
"Let us who mystically represent the cherubim and sing the Thrice-holy Hymn to the life-giving trinity, now lay aside all cares of life, that we may receive the King of all, escorted invisibly by ranks of angels, alleluia, alleluia, alleluia."
-- The Cherubic Hymn, Liturgy of St John Chrysostom --
|
26th June 2005, 01:47 PM
| | bel esprit
29
| | Join Date: 28th October 2003 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 11,802
Blessings: 103,681
Reps: 45,671 (power: 65) | | Originally Posted by Kripost One question: Does hair count as vestigal, since it does not seem to do much except social functions, including sexual attraction?
Head hair? Nah, I doubt it. A vestige is something that has lost its original function due to evolution, a vestige isn't necessarily non-functioning. Human hair still has the sane function as it did in human ancestors.
btw, I figured out what to call that pink thing is the corner of the eye. It's called plica semilunaris. \m/
__________________
Veritas omnia vincit.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
26th June 2005, 09:58 PM
|  | Waiting for His coming
22 
| | Join Date: 10th June 2005 Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,975
Blessings: 78,923
Reps: 4,632 (power: 13) | | Originally Posted by USincognito The common Creationist straw man of vestigial characterists are that they are organs or structures that have lost all function, though they had function in progenator species. I just thought of a short list of simple things our bodies do that more accurately represent vestigial (diminished or changed function, not functionless) remains of our ancestral past.
- Prehensile toes. I, and I'm sure most people can pick things up between their toes. I have a bad back and try not to squat to save wear on my knees, so if I'm bare footed and need to pick something up, my feet do the work.
- Wiggling ears. I can wiggle my ears. We all are physically able to, but you just need to learn to flex the right muscles. This is a more ancient vestigial from prehensile toes going probably back to our Consestor with pro-simians or earlier.
- Flaring nostrils. Oddly enough, this one evidences Aquatic Ape theory as much as it does a functional vestige of times when our Consestors used their sense of smell and needed to open their nostrils wide and get as much scent in as possible.
- Goosebumps. I think everyone knows why we get these and how they're a vestige of when our ancestors had more body hair.
These seemingly inconsequential vestigial functions might not be as glamorous as the coccyx or appendix, but they point inevitably with the rest of the mountains of evidence, in favor of evolution and common ancestry.
"Vestigial" functions, although extremely contoversial, do not prove or even help evolution's case. What's the problem with God using a similar design for humans and apes? We do not have transitional fossils that demonstrate these organs gradually becoming less useful, so therefore you have no case.  |
26th June 2005, 10:02 PM
| | The cake is a lie.
31
| | Join Date: 11th May 2004 Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,547
Blessings: 91,149
Reps: 27,572 (power: 39) | | Originally Posted by Bornagain15 "Vestigial" functions, although extremely contoversial, do not prove or even help evolution's case. What's the problem with God using a similar design for humans and apes? We do not have transitional fossils that demonstrate these organs gradually becoming less useful, so therefore you have no case.
On the other hand, why would God create animals with useless organs that are very very similar to useFUL organs being used by very very similar animals?
Goose bumps are a good example.
__________________ Look at me still talking when there's science to do! | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
