Kent Hovind's Lies

Here is your thread on Kent's lies...

First that rotting plesiosaur found by the japanese trawler...

Kent states...

"These two pictures are of an apparent Plesiosaur caught by a Japanese fishing boat off the coast of New Zealand in 1977. It had apparently been dead for a couple weeks. It was 32 feet long and weighed 4000 pounds. Some have argued that this is a basking shark because the protein was 96% similar to shark protein. No one has ever seen plesiosaur protein to know what it should look like. Scores of vastly different animals have very similar proteins. This only proves a common designer for both.

[Scituate.jpg (23063 bytes)]
"
http://drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=articles&specific=15

THat is the link to his page.

Answers in Genisis, an=other creationist site debunks this myth...

http://answersingenesis.org/docs/4216cen_m1999.asp

Check it out.

To be fair, I would not necessarily call this one a lie. That one can be explained by him being bull-header, stupid, ignorant, grasping at straws, etc.

If you want a lie then his insistance that two parts of the same mammoth dated thousands of years apart or his telling a court of law that he no income would be a better bet.

Lewis,

What is your post supposed to show? I saw what he said about the plesiosaur, and didn't find anything strange in it. Please tell me what the point of this thread is.

Your brother i Christ,
Alex

Click on the AiG link. It wasn't a plesiosaur, it was a basking shark. Hovind continues to insist that it is a plesiosaur because he is more interested in bolstering his own interpretation of Genesis than he is in the truth.