Does Science prove God does not exist?

Or so says the theist typing away at a computer.

I concur with Morat, as science requires something that can be repeatable ad infitum to "prove" it. Thus by extension logic, being the vehicle through which scientific theories arise and fall, can only conclude so much. Of course, if you can get God / The Creator / The Force / <insert favourite diety here> to jump thru hoops again and again for us to study, that wouldn't make him/her/it much of a God now, would it?

__________________
"One cannot be too overzealous when it comes to guarding the Truth."

Note: The observations must be repeatable. Not the event. Unique events can be studied, so long as they leave data that can be observed.

The worldwide iriduim layer at the KT boundary, for instance.

I think computers offer ample evidence that scientific results are not always reproducible.

Yeah, but he's using Windows.

It is a scientific proving for existence of god. At first, it proves existence of ghost because existence of it is a reason for existence of god.
Our brain reflects to signals that enter to brain. When somebody asks us a question, we answer him.
For this purpose, there is no need to ghost and complicated connections in brain transform these entering signals to re-act in miscellaneous members in body. But we feel events that occur, too.
Imagine a robot that the network of brain has been simulated for it by electronic circuits. It re-acts like a human but can we say that it feels events, which occur, and even what itself do. How we can say a combination of materials as brain or that simulated brain circuit is aware of activities that happens in itself and feels them. I think we cannot explain it without accepting the existence ghost.
Existence of ghost is a reason for existence of god.

Translation: I assume that there is no natural explanation for X. Therefore there is no natural explanation for X. Therefore there must be a supernatural explanation for X. Let's call him God.

Wow. I'm convinced.

What article?

The thread title/OP ask two different things.

1.Does science Prove that God does not exist?
no. science hasn't really had that on the agenda. Too busy loking at everything else. Proving or disproving he existence of God has been more popular in the philosophy than science. Even last year at my college a philosophy student "proved" God exists in a colloquium.They have to do something while they sit drinking coffee.

2. Does science prove that everything was not made by God?
I can't answer that one as well as some others here. I know the arguments but am not really able to repeat them well.

__________________
Jesus said, "If a blind person leads a blind person, both of them will fall into a hole." Thomas 34

"On blind faith they place reliance, what they need more of is science"- MC Hawking

He means his own post, pureone.


Wow. This thread is really old.

Ah.

Yes.

__________________
Jesus said, "If a blind person leads a blind person, both of them will fall into a hole." Thomas 34

"On blind faith they place reliance, what they need more of is science"- MC Hawking