Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
Is there any serious evidence for this? And if so, doesn't the problem still arise pertaining to where did the original universe arise from? Or can we not even speculate on that because we will presumably never travel/see outside of our own universe?
Is there any serious evidence for this? And if so, doesn't the problem still arise pertaining to where did the original universe arise from? Or can we not even speculate on that because we will presumably never travel/see outside of our own universe?
One like to think so, there seems to be a very slight amount of evidence for it, manily through quantum physics.
If we can continue to progress scientifically, why shouldn't we be able to travel between them if they exist?
One like to think so, there seems to be a very slight amount of evidence for it, manily through quantum physics.
If we can continue to progress scientifically, why shouldn't we be able to travel between them if they exist?
If by some miracle (no pun, Atheists), multiple universes could be proved, would that pose a problem for adherents to God? One could obviously bring up that already posed question (in a "uni"versal sense) that if we were God's special creation, why are there such expansive, unreachable universes?
If by some miracle (no pun, Atheists), multiple universes could be proved, would that pose a problem for adherents to God? One could obviously bring up that already posed question (in a "uni"versal sense) that if we were God's special creation, why are there such expansive, unreachable universes?
I'll jump in here with two standard cookie cutter responses that Ive seen time and again-
1- Because God creates all the time
and/or
2- To declare His Glory
__________________
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." Galileo Galilei
"Telling me the ToE is wrong is like telling a car mechanic
the internal combustion engine runs on magic."- Blayz
The POINT of Creationism, from an honest Creationist
"And yes, to prove evolution is wrong does not mean creation is right. But, the goal is just that, to prove evolution is wrong. Nothing else."
-juvenissun
If by some miracle (no pun, Atheists), multiple universes could be proved, would that pose a problem for adherents to God? One could obviously bring up that already posed question (in a "uni"versal sense) that if we were God's special creation, why are there such expansive, unreachable universes?
Not for this one., who also believes that we aren't God's only special creation...probably the most special thng about earth, is that we got to have the Son of God live among us for 33 years...
Is there any serious evidence for something that is beyond our ability to detect or perceive? No there is not. How can there be serious evidence for something there is no evidence for?
If by some miracle (no pun, Atheists), multiple universes could be proved, would that pose a problem for adherents to God? One could obviously bring up that already posed question (in a "uni"versal sense) that if we were God's special creation, why are there such expansive, unreachable universes?
We could all become Mormons and believe each universe was created by an Adam who achieved divinity.
__________________ The high, the low, all of creation God gives to humankind to use. If this privilege is misused, God's Justice permits creation to punish humanity~~ Hildegard of Bingen cited in, Earth Prayers from around the World
Is there any serious evidence for something that is beyond our ability to detect or perceive? No there is not. How can there be serious evidence for something there is no evidence for?
Is there any serious evidence for this? And if so, doesn't the problem still arise pertaining to where did the original universe arise from? Or can we not even speculate on that because we will presumably never travel/see outside of our own universe?
There is "evidence" for the Multiverse Interpretation of QM, but perhaps that evidence will be able to be explained by another Interpretation in the future. Currently Everett's Multiverse Interpretation is the only explanation for the results of the century old Two Slit Experiment that maintains causality. So if one assumes causality is important, one is left with no alternatives.
Linear Mode
