Home | Be a Christian | Devotionals | Join Us! | Forums | Rules | F.A.Q.


Go Back   Christian Forums > Theology (Christians Only) > Theology (Christian Only) > Christian Scriptures > Bibliology & Hermeneutics
Register BlogsPrayersJobsArcade Calendar Mark Forums Read

Bibliology & Hermeneutics The study of the Bible and Scriptures, and its interpretation and translation.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22nd May 2002, 12:57 PM
Josephus's Avatar
Chief Waterbuffalo (Ret.)

34 Gender: Male Faith: Messianic Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 14th April 2002
Posts: 4,056
Blessings: 35,301
Reps: 50,462,225 (power: 50,478)
Josephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond repute
Josephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond repute
Principles of Studying the Bible

The Five Principles to Studying the Bible:
from: http://www.ptm.org/98PT/SepOct/HHlights.htm

Easy Acronym: LIGHTS

1. Literal
2. Ilummination
3. Grammatical
4. Historical
5. Teaching
6. Scriptual Harmony


1. Literal Principle
This means we should interpret the Word of God in its most normal and natural sense.


2. Illumination Principle
The Holy Spirit within a believer gives insights that can only be spiritually discerned. The Holy Spirit helps us exegete (draw out of) rather than eisegete (read into) Scripture. He illumines only what is in the text; illumination does not go beyond the text.

"The Spirit of truth provides insights for the mind and illumination for the heart."


3. Grammatical Principle
Scripture is to be interpreted in accord with typical rules of grammar, including syntax and style.


4. Historical Principle
The biblical text is best understood when one is familiar with the customs, culture and historical context of biblical times.


5.Teaching Principle
As we seek to rightly interpret God's Word, we would do well to consult those whom God has uniquely gifted as teachers in the church (cf. Titus 2:1-15) and who guard against wolves in sheep's clothing that will not spare the flock (Acts 20:29).


6. Scriptual Harmony Principle
Individual passages of Scripture must always harmonize with Scripture as a whole. One text can never be interpreted to conflict with other passages. If a particular passage can be interpreted in several ways, the only choice is that interpretation which harmonizes with the rest of Scripture. God does not contradict himself.
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!

  #2  
Old 23rd May 2002, 03:52 PM
Josephus's Avatar
Chief Waterbuffalo (Ret.)

34 Gender: Male Faith: Messianic Member For 5 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 14th April 2002
Posts: 4,056
Blessings: 35,301
Reps: 50,462,225 (power: 50,478)
Josephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond repute
Josephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond reputeJosephus has a reputation beyond repute
I should also mention the main source for my study is the one and only bible of it's kind:

The Greek & Hebrew Interlinear Bible
by Sovereign Grace Publishers
http://www.sovgracepub.com/bibles/interlinear1vol.htm

When people ask me what version of the bible I use, I just tell them: The Hebrew Old Testament, and the Greek New Testament. All translations of the bible are based off of these two works; so I highly encourage serious bible studyers to buy this bible - the only one of its kind (since there is only one original languages bible!). You can translate portions yourself, or read the literal English included in the columns. To see an example of this bible, a photographic version of the Book of Genesis is included online here:

http://www.sovgracepub.com/bibles/in...ages/page1.htm

Keep in mind that Hebrew is read from right to left.

The power of this bible is that Strongs Concordance numbers number every word of the Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic texts for easy referecing for a particular meaning of a word. This is a book that most bible translators use when they develop modernized versions of the bible in other languages.

Last edited by Josephus; 23rd May 2002 at 03:57 PM.
  #3  
Old 6th August 2002, 03:47 PM
Junior Member

Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 3rd March 2002
Posts: 36
Blessings: 108,404
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
ThrdJohn13 is on a distinguished road
I'm sorry, but I humbly think I need to disagree.

An important book to read before considering the use of some of these aids is D.A. Carson's "Exegetical Fallacies" which makes these following points and others glaringly clear.

I've studied Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic for a while. All of my seminary professors (and I have to agree with them) strongly discourage the use of the interlinears and key-word study Bibles (one of them in the first Greek class of a semester told everyone if they had an interlinear not to use it, and throw it in the trash. Another prof said that if you don't know the difference between a "dagesh lene" and a "dagesh forte" then you shouldn't preach from the Old Testament). I used to use a key-word Bible for a while (and considered the interlinears too) before I learned the languages, and in hindsight I'm pretty convinced that it was a dangerous mistake (I made many interpretational errors as a result of my ignorance of the language in light of the information provided, which was also, incidentally, suspect for various reasons. In essence, it was just "too easy".). The profs discourage the use of them not just because they inhibit the study of the languages, but they're greater interpretational liabilities than reliable study aids; especially if the user does not have a proficiency in the original languages -- in which case, using such aids can lead to serious exegetical errors and misunderstandings about the original languages and the definitions of words just as what happened to me; whereas a better suggestion would probably be to just trust the original translation team (which certainly does have such a proficiency). In other words, they invite a person to know enough to be dangerous enough to start his or her own cult. If the person does have the proficiency, he or she really ought to be reading a critical Greek testament and Hebrew Bible with the aid of reference grammars and lexicons anyway. Consequently, one can see how the Strongs concordance and Vines dictionaries would also become a problem as well. I may change my mind later, but at this point I'd really prefer it if those aids weren't available in print.

In my opinion, if you're not ready to seriously study the original languages, read more than one good English translation (NIV, ESV, NAS, NKJV, NRSV, etc. not BBE or the Message), and pick up some good Bible commentaries, and maybe some good theology books (depending on the author of course).

-J
  #4  
Old 28th September 2002, 09:20 AM
Jephunneh's Avatar
Senior Member

Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 23rd August 2002
Posts: 721
Blessings: 128,269
Reps: 9 (power: 0)
Jephunneh is an unknown quantity at this point
Idea ....search the Scriptures

Ten Things That Will Help You In Your Personal Bible Studies

Get a King James Bible



Develop a Regular Reading Habit

Bible study is great, but don't forget to spend some time each day simply reading the Bible. The Christian needs to feel at home in the "Bible environment". By reading it regularly, you'll become familiar with it's vocabulary, it's characters, special memory verses, it's precious promises, valuable lessons, and doctrinal truths. The more familiar you become with God's word the more you'll enjoy it.


Take Your Bible With You

God's word is your spiritual food and your weapon, so why leave home without it?

Pray for Wisdom and Understanding

The Author of the Bible is STILL ALIVE, so He can help you understand it (James 1:5; I John 2:27; I Kings 3:5-12). When is the last time you asked the Lord for understanding?


Keep Your Sins Confessed

Keep yourself clean (I John 1:9) so that God can pour His truth into a clean vessel, a vessel that is fit for the Master's use. God is not particularly interested in teaching His word to someone with a wicked heart (Psa. 66:18; Eze. 14:1-9). I believe it was John Bunyan who said that the Bible will keep you from sin, or sin will keep you from the Bible.


Always Believe What You Read

To question God's word is satanic (Gen. 3:1), so don't ever question it. Just believe it by faith. If you can't understand it, then at least believe it.


Make It A Habit to Mark Your Bible

You aren't growing any younger, so your memory isn't growing any better. Start marking your Bible by underlining or circling special words and verses. Write important notes and references in the margins. A few years from now you'll be very glad you did. Just ask anyone who does it.

What should you mark it with? I've tried these special pens that aren't supposed to bleed through the paper, and I personally do not care for them. I use a fine point, black, ball point pen and dry highlight markers. For special notes, I use other color ball points, but they're all fine point and I never press hard. Never use felt tips or roller balls.


Start Your Own Library

Get a good concordance, such as Strong's or Young's. This will allow you to look up any word in the Bible in all of the places where it is found. If you have a computer, get a good program like QuickVerse, which has a Strong's concordance along with a Bible dictionary, an atlas, and several other options.

Dispensational Truth by Clarence Larkin has been one of the best general study books for several decades. His other works are also very good.



An Old Scofield reference Bible is very helpful (1909 or 1917 edition).

The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge is a jewel, as it contains thousands of helpful Scripture references. It is also available as an option in QuickVerse software packages.




Thank God for Everything You Learn

We really are unworthy to sit at the feet of our Saviour and learn, yet He commands us to do so. We should count it an honor and privilege! When you learn a new truth, no matter how small, always THANK Him! (I Ths. 5:18; Rom. 1:21).


Apply What You Learn

James 1:22 tells us to DO the word, not just hear it. A sponge that only soaks up water will become sour! Don't be a sour Christian. God teaches us the word because He desires to use us in His service. He feeds us that we might be healthy and strong to fight His battles. Don't be a draft dodger. Apply what you learn as you learn. Get your basic training and then get on the battlefield!
  #5  
Old 5th October 2002, 07:07 AM
Member

Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 21st March 2002
Location: Here
Posts: 68
Blessings: 108,408
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
Aikido7 is on a distinguished road
What we see playing out in this thread is the inevitable result of Martin Luther's Reformation in the 1500s. One of Luther's key acts was to wrest the Bible away from the province of priests and make it available through translation to the common people.

It's a little too much to expect a lot of biblical literacy when we've only had some 500 years to be familiar with Scripture.

Attempting to force "individual passages of Scripture... to harmonize with Scripture as a whole" barely disquises the screws of the Inquisition or the fiat of a heresy trial.

All of this, unfortunately, is a normal outgrowth of the "every knee will bend and every tongue will confess" method of teaching which owes more to the Crusades and Constantine than it does to the enigmatic rabbi of Galilee.

Jesus orally taught in parables and demonstrated the Kingdom of God with healings and exorcisms (except in John). He demonstrated the divine and did not attempt to force it.

The LITERAL apporach is fraught with complexities: since the Bible is a collection of books written in different times, in different styles and by different writers, one can only justify a literalistic position by withdrawal or obstinance. ILLUMINATION is trickey, for the message one may draw out of Scripture would be different for Billy Graham, David Koresh or Jerry Falwell. Or you and me. GRAMMATICAL and HISTORICAL are the province of scholars and hopefully a growing acquaintance with what mainline exegetes have known for centuries will serve the cause of biblical literacy. These days TEACHING seems to be done by pulling out any marginally relevant verse from its context to apply it to everything from abortion rights to how to make money in real estate.

And, as I mentioned above, any attempt to force SCRIPTURAL HARMONY demonstrates the low tolerance for ambiguity most believers have. Black and white is so much easier. There is a good reason why the parables and aphorisms of Jesus are not dwelt upon much in today's
churches.

I remember a bumpersticker years ago which proclaimed "God Said It, I Believe It and That Settles It!" Of course there's no answer to that,
nor should one attempt to try one, but it is worth noting the previous addition to this thread that "To question God's word is satanic (Gen.3-1) so don't even question it." I am just surprised to read this on a website called "Christian FORUMS where Christians of every stripe gather to question and discern the great mandates of our faith!

Like the Essenes of the first century, people like this have retreated to their own desert and their end-time paranoia. Because the Essenes withdrew from the world, they ultimately lost their place in it....
__________________
SETTING UP EVANGELICALS ON BLIND DATES WITH JESUS
"putting the FUN back into fundamentalism since 1919"

Last edited by Aikido7; 13th October 2002 at 12:07 PM.
  #6  
Old 21st November 2002, 12:46 PM
Rick Otto's Avatar
The Dude Abides

Gender: Male Married Faith: Christian Party: US-Others Country: United States Member For 5 Years Tentmaker
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 19th November 2002
Location: On The Prairie
Posts: 22,693
Blessings: 28,089,370
My Mood Tolerant
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,854,808)
Rick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond repute
Rick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond reputeRick Otto has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks for the info & links Josephus.
I think its important to have this information available.
The risks of misinterpretation are better than the risk of no interpretation.

I believe it is antichrist to horde the word and declare the masses to ignorant to be trusted with it.
__________________
Dear Optimist, Pessimist, & Realist...
While you were arguing about the glass of water, I drank it!
Sincerely,
The Opportunist
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #7  
Old 23rd November 2002, 02:38 PM
Regular Member

Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 16th November 2002
Posts: 153
Blessings: 108,402
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
Matthew is on a distinguished road
All of my seminary professors (and I have to agree with them) strongly discourage the use of the interlinears and key-word study Bibles (one of them in the first Greek class of a semester told everyone if they had an interlinear not to use it, and throw it in the trash.
Having studied Hebrew for a while, (not Greek) I have to agree with your professors. Keyword studies are dangerous without more knowledge of the language.

I used to use a key-word Bible for a while (and considered the interlinears too) before I learned the languages, and in hindsight I'm pretty convinced that it was a dangerous mistake (I made many interpretational errors as a result of my ignorance of the language in light of the information provided, which was also, incidentally, suspect for various reasons. In essence, it was just "too easy".).
Having had the same experience, and seeing others do this on the forums, I am convinced that learning the languages prior to using a Hebrew/Greek Bible is a must.

To repeat what you said: If you don't know the original, use a translation!
  #8  
Old 23rd November 2002, 02:47 PM
Regular Member

Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 16th November 2002
Posts: 153
Blessings: 108,402
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
Matthew is on a distinguished road
Attempting to force "individual passages of Scripture... to harmonize with Scripture as a whole" barely disquises the screws of the Inquisition or the fiat of a heresy trial.

All of this, unfortunately, is a normal outgrowth of the "every knee will bend and every tongue will confess" method of teaching which owes more to the Crusades and Constantine than it does to the enigmatic rabbi of Galilee.

Jesus orally taught in parables and demonstrated the Kingdom of God with healings and exorcisms (except in John). He <I>demonstrated</I> the divine and did not attempt to force it.
That is not what Josephus said. He said that if there are (say) 2 interpretations of a particular scripture, and the first one contradicts another scripture, the second interpretation is correct. This rule is not to be applied first.

There is nothing in here about heresy trials, the crusades, or the inquisition!

The <B>LITERAL</B> apporach is fraught with complexities: since the Bible is a collection of books written in different times, in different styles and by different writers, one can only justify a literalistic position by withdrawal or obstinance.
He did not say that one takes everything in the Bible literally. (That is why the word plainly or naturally would have been better in the acronym.)

ILLUMINATION is trickey, for the message one may <I>draw out</I> of Scripture would be different for Billy Graham, David Koresh or Jerry Falwell. Or you and me.
That is not illumination. Further this principle was poorly defined. The Holy Spirit merely draws our attention to what is already in the text, He doesn't provide us with new information!
  #9  
Old 23rd November 2002, 07:21 PM
Member

Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 21st March 2002
Location: Here
Posts: 68
Blessings: 108,408
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
Aikido7 is on a distinguished road
Josephus said what I redacted in "quotation marks. " Everything else in the post is the meaning I took from what he said. There is nothing about "crusades."

I first noticed this acronym from "the Bible Answer Man" some time ago, so maybe I have been unfair to assume it was from Josephus.
__________________
SETTING UP EVANGELICALS ON BLIND DATES WITH JESUS
"putting the FUN back into fundamentalism since 1919"

Last edited by Aikido7; 23rd November 2002 at 07:35 PM.
  #10  
Old 10th December 2002, 06:44 PM
Newbie

Gender: Female Faith: Christian Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 10th December 2002
Location: Petersfield Hants
Posts: 8
Blessings: 88,260
Reps: 10 (power: 0)
pawz is on a distinguished road
hello people, hello again, this is my first post on here. Can I say what a good contrast this Christian Forum displays compared to another which I have just come from. There so many folk were bickering and being hostile - it did not seem Christian at all to me. Here the responses, what few I have seen so far, are measured, civil refreshingly without the pettiness and rancour which sullied the other. Wonderful!

Now Mr Josephus, I would like to agree with you about having study aids such as an interlinear bible ( the one you mentioned is not the only one of its kind though). While I feel sure the other folk who say you need to know the original languages have a valid point, that does not mean us ordinary mortals should be denied the privilege of reading Scripture in its original languages. No English translation can completely convey all the original meanings and forces and moods and intents. You are dependent upon the best efforts of the translator and perhaps his or her biases as well. I am not very far advanced in my study of Hebrew or Greek ( and I do not feel I need to speak the languages anyway, but, yes indeed, seek to have an accurate grasp of what it is I am reading), and I recognise there are huge areas especially in the Hebrew that I need to master before I can confidently believe that I have drawn all out of a word or phrase that the good Lord put in - so what do I do? I repair to the views of those experts in the oriental languages who do have the knowledge I still lack, and let them explain to me&nbsp;just what is being conveyed in that particular instance if I am in doubt. I have books by Strong, Young, Wigram, Green, Newberry,Thayer, Gesenius, Rashti,&nbsp; Hebrew and Greek text books, etc, and there is plenty of help on the web to be had.
__________________
Gracie
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Closed Thread


Return to Bibliology & Hermeneutics

Thread Tools
Display Modes


 
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM.