| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | | 
16th April 2004, 03:53 PM
|  | Zen Philosophic Christian
 | | Join Date: 15th April 2004
Posts: 330
Blessings: 108,785
Reps: 144 (power: 0) | | Forget the Moon, spacetravel doesn't exist anyway. Save the discussion of pro and contra on thousands of questionable issues around the faked or not faked Apollo missions. No spacetravel:
Since spacetravel does not exist yet, there can have been no moon missions. Why is not exists? Since 1972 there has been no one astronaut said to be farther away from the surface of the earth than 400-800 km. No Apollo:
Or do you think that there is any other area of science where, in the modern times, in 32 years there has been such a backward development that to reproduce the landings it takes another 10 to 20 years to go to the moon? From a time with very simple calculators to the modern day with real computers??
Dream on! | 
16th April 2004, 04:00 PM
|  | bel esprit 30  | | Join Date: 28th October 2003 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 11,802
Blessings: 121,855
Reps: 45,671 (power: 66) | | | Are you serious? Or making fun of the moon landing conspiracy theorists?
__________________ Veritas omnia vincit. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
16th April 2004, 04:04 PM
|  | Zen Philosophic Christian
 | | Join Date: 15th April 2004
Posts: 330
Blessings: 108,785
Reps: 144 (power: 0) | | No, I am seriours. These are facts, no one will dispute that they stay in low earth orbit nor that it will take, afther Bush's statements 10-20 year to 'return' to the moon. | 
16th April 2004, 04:08 PM
|  | bel esprit 30  | | Join Date: 28th October 2003 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 11,802
Blessings: 121,855
Reps: 45,671 (power: 66) | | | So you think that the 1969 mission to the moon didn't actually land on the moon, but instead stayed in low earth orbit before returning to Earth and that the moon landing is a hoax?
__________________ Veritas omnia vincit. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
16th April 2004, 04:08 PM
|  | Teleologist 27 
| | Join Date: 1st August 2003 Location: Florida
Posts: 2,284
Blessings: 78,103
Reps: 1,320 (power: 13) | | | What's your proof that there has never been a human outside of the Earth's "low orbit"?
__________________ | 
16th April 2004, 05:15 PM
| | Regular Member 30  | | Join Date: 26th December 2003
Posts: 290
Blessings: 68,192
Reps: 2,335,890 (power: 2,345) | | Originally Posted by Michali What's your proof that there has never been a human outside of the Earth's "low orbit"?
Personal experience. I've been on some real benders after a night down the pub. | 
16th April 2004, 06:04 PM
| | Senior Veteran 33  | | Join Date: 22nd March 2004
Posts: 2,105
Blessings: 109,974
Reps: 3,260 (power: 15) | | | the reason we haven't gone back to the moon is because it's so incredibly expensive, and without the space race between the russians and the US, there is not enough motivation to invest so much money in going there. | 
16th April 2004, 07:24 PM
| | Master Debater 29  | | Join Date: 15th November 2003 Location: Wolf Creek, Oregon
Posts: 172
Blessings: 109,327
Reps: 26 (power: 0) | | | I'm sure this has something to do with a lack of understanding regarding radiation belts.
__________________ People for the Eating of Tasty Animals. | 
16th April 2004, 09:15 PM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 20th March 2004 Location: NPR, Florida
Posts: 176
Blessings: 108,986
Reps: 119 (power: 0) | | | Whats interesting is that we could have gone to mars in the 70's- but the public lost interest, and with the opposition to all things nuclear (they had developed nuclear engines) it never happened.
__________________ "The intelligent beings in these regions should therefore not be surprised if they observe that their locality in the universe satisfies the conditions that are necessary for their existence. It is a bit like a rich person living in a wealthy neighborhood not seeing any poverty."
Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time | 
16th April 2004, 09:30 PM
|  | Regular Member 28  | | Join Date: 11th April 2004
Posts: 191
Blessings: 108,330
Reps: 559 (power: 0) | | No Apollo:
Or do you think that there is any other area of science where, in the modern times, in 32 years there has been such a backward development that to reproduce the landings it takes another 10 to 20 years to go to the moon? From a time with very simple calculators to the modern day with real computers??
in 1969 we went to prove we could. why would we have wanted to go in the last 32 years when the price tag include over 9 zeros. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |