Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
I know peole will jsut make fun of me agian, but I need to get the trugh out. I have been seing the ways tha t evolutionsts deal with arguemnts for creation. I have already started a thread about the political games that evos play, but I have since learned even more distrubin thingts. There have been sites taht have iformation that evos are incapable fo dealing wiht so they hack the sites. They think they can promote evolutionism by silencing all opposing views. Creationist have never needed to do this. You don't see creationists tryng to hack talkorigins do yoU? IF evolution is really as supported by science as its believers say it is then evos wouldn't have to resort to using such tactics.
Now go ahead and ridicule me all you want. I don't care. It is my duty to make sure the tactics of evo hackers don't go unkonwn.
I know peole will jsut make fun of me agian, but I need to get the trugh out. I have been seing the ways tha t evolutionsts deal with arguemnts for creation. I have already started a thread about the political games that evos play, but I have since learned even more distrubin thingts. There have been sites taht have iformation that evos are incapable fo dealing wiht so they hack the sites. They think they can promote evolutionism by silencing all opposing views. Creationist have never needed to do this. You don't see creationists tryng to hack talkorigins do yoU? IF evolution is really as supported by science as its believers say it is then evos wouldn't have to resort to using such tactics.
Now go ahead and ridicule me all you want. I don't care. It is my duty to make sure the tactics of evo hackers don't go unkonwn.
So then the obvious question is: can you backup the statements you have made here? That would mean that you:
A: provide the claims evolutionists 'have not been able to refute', as well as the counterarguments evolutionists have brought up against them (if any) and the reason why these counterarguments are incorrect.
B: provide evidence that evolutionists hack creationist sites.
I think it is a very serious allegation you are making here and one that I would like to see addressed. If this indeed happens, I'd say it is a disgrace and wholly unnescessary.
I would also like to ask you to use the spellchecker. No offense, but I think you make a number of spelling errors that make your post harder to read and this can easily be avoided by using the spellchecker option.
__________________
Tom
'What luck for rulers, that men do not think.'
-Ascribed to Adolf Hitler-
`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
-Through the Looking Glas by Lewis Caroll-
Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.
It's been a while since I've posted here so I thought I'd ease back into it by replying to something less demanding of effort than many of the posts around here.
Anyway...
Originally Posted by DGE Project
I know peole will jsut make fun of me agian, but I need to get the trugh out.
I, for one, wont make fun of you. Not intentionally at least. However for future reference, as another poster has pointed out, this site does have a spellcheck feature.
Originally Posted by DGE Project
I have been seing the ways tha t evolutionsts deal with arguemnts for creation. I have already started a thread about the political games that evos play, but I have since learned even more distrubin thingts. There have been sites taht have iformation that evos are incapable fo dealing wiht so they hack the sites. They think they can promote evolutionism by silencing all opposing views.
I can only assume you're not going for humor here and that you're entirely serious. With that in mind, please give references to these events you speak of as I'm unaware of any such happenings. I could just be out of the loop but I doubt it since this is a rather dubious claim to begin with.
Originally Posted by DGE Project
Creationist have never needed to do this. You don't see creationists tryng to hack talkorigins do yoU?
Not to my knowledge. Creationists tend to spout off unsupported nonsensical drivel and hope that no one knowledgeable is around to refute their claims.
Originally Posted by DGE Project
IF evolution is really as supported by science as its believers say it is then evos wouldn't have to resort to using such tactics.
I don't believe they do. Again, please give some sources for your claims.
Originally Posted by DGE Project
Now go ahead and ridicule me all you want. I don't
care.
I haven't, at least I hope it doesn't read that way, and I wouldn't.
Originally Posted by DGE Project
It is my duty to make sure the tactics of evo hackers don't go unkonwn.
Good for you! So, step one: Show your source for your claim.
__________________ FAITH, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one who
speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
Your request that we do not make fun of you is completely reasonable. In fact, you should not have to ask at all; other members should simply practice courtesy as a rule.
However, because you did ask, I'm wondering why I, in turn, must ask that you show some respect for evolutionists. If you have evidence that evolutionists have hacked into creationists sites, then please post it. Otherwise, do not make such serious accusations if you have nothing to back them up. That is no better than tossing insults. It's just a bit sneakier.
If you want to be respected, you'll have to show some respect in return.
Here is a trhead where I discused other dishonest tactics used by evolutionists. An athiest mole tried to infiltrate Fred William's forum adn was caught. People laughed at me when i said evos were trying to take down the forums, but now look waht has happened. Fred's board was hacked by evos and just recently got back up again. Fred has posted all the details of what happened on the forum.