Evolution...

"The bacteria it cannot kill remains and multiplies, eventually making the 'antibacterial' product ineffective. "

Exactly, ADAPTATION at its best.

"Leeching was never scientific. "

and I would disagree. Can you point me to a book that will change my mind?


"Evolution logically follows from those assumptions. "

Unfortunatly no it doesn't. NO matter how much time you put in, speciation won't happen.

"evolution is the best hypothesis we've got right now. "

I think its really funny that when huge holes are pointed out in the theory believers of said theory point fingers and very humanly say, "well, you prove one then!!!!" That's not how science works. If there is no theory, then there is no theory, its not, lets keep this one till we find one that is less false.

Actually, keeping the most accurate theory until finding one that is less false is EXACTLY what science is about.

Learning through mistakes, in other words.

Sure, there are other aspects to science, but this is one of the important ones.

Please explain away the gaping holes in creation science, if you would. I guarantee it will be harder than explaining away the holes in evolution.

"Actually, keeping the most accurate theory until finding one that is less false is EXACTLY what science is about. "

No, if you find a theory to be false, it is rejected. Keeping a false theory isn't how science works.

"Learning through mistakes, in other words. "

Keeping something false isn't learning through mistakes.

"Please explain away the gaping holes in creation science, if you would. I guarantee it will be harder than explaining away the holes in evolution."

*sigh* there it is again, the pointing finger of evolutionists when problems arise..."so prove YOUR theory!!" *sigh* so much for unbiased science.

If you aren't willing to prove your theory then your theory isn't science.

"If you aren't willing to prove your theory then your theory isn't science.
"

I didn't say I was not willing to, but the problem is you're being prideful because evolution has holes in it. Don't take it personally when something in science you believe to be right isn't. YOu showed me that by you pointing a finger and bitterly saying what you did.

There you go pointing the proverbial finger at evolution and calling it false again. Youre doing what youre telling me not to do.

Both evolution and creation are full of holes, and from my research, I believe the holes in evolution to be fewer than those in creation science.

No, this thread is about evolution, so my questioning it is quite approprate. You are pitching a fit because evolution is questioned and fails, they you point your finger and whine about it and say, okay, give me your theory. I already know you're biased against it and will say its wrong no matter what I say, or how I prove it. the holes in evolution are quite big thus telling me that its not right.

Yes, your questioning of evolution would be appropriate. But you said when it is questioned it fails... but where? Certainly not everywhere.
I already know that you're biased against evolution, and will say that it is wrong despite the fact that more evidence exists to support it than exists to support six-day creation six thousand years ago.

The holes in creation are quite big too.

We are starting to argue the same things over and over, and we just won't be getting anywhere.

"But you said when it is questioned it fails... but where? "

Macro.

"I already know that you're biased against evolution, "

Actually I started out being pro when I studied it, but it failed, so I think its false now based on my study of it.

Again, you're off topic refering to creation. Just pretty much whining again when people question evolution, but thus is the evolutionist response for the majority.