| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |
 | | 
13th March 2004, 11:27 PM
|  | aude sapere...sed praeterea, aude esse
23    
 | | Join Date: 15th February 2004
Posts: 3,660
Blessings: 90,152
Reps: 15,076 (power: 26) | | Originally Posted by ilwjc I love Kent Hovind. He is wonderful, smart and handsome.
His website is right on.
I love his $250,000 offer to evolutionists. The evolutionists claim he wants the "big bang" demonstrated, but he said and I heard him that ANY proof will do.
Produce a fossil...
Evolutionists conventiently forget the law of biogenesis which demonstrates life cannot create itself.
There are no fossils and if anyone thinks so, he is deceived. If there were, the evolutionists would not have tried their Peltdown man trick.
To think the brain came before the mind is absurd.
Is this post for real? |
13th March 2004, 11:32 PM
| | Regular Member
  
| | Join Date: 24th February 2004
Posts: 360
Blessings: 91,015
Reps: 893 (power: 0) | | | Uh huh. The post is real.
Explain how the brain came before the mind (which is what Darwin taught.) |
13th March 2004, 11:33 PM
|  | GondolierAce
30 
| | Join Date: 9th February 2003
Posts: 4,293
Blessings: 99,190
Reps: 6,626 (power: 20) | | | Ever see a mind without a brain?
I rest my case.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
High Priest, Infallible Interpreter, and Official Smitether of Justineianity
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
13th March 2004, 11:37 PM
| | Regular Member
| | Join Date: 24th February 2004
Posts: 360
Blessings: 91,015
Reps: 893 (power: 0) | | | Which came first and how. Explain.
I want to debunk you. |
13th March 2004, 11:38 PM
| | GondolierAce
30
| | Join Date: 9th February 2003
Posts: 4,293
Blessings: 99,190
Reps: 6,626 (power: 20) | | | Define 'mind'.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
High Priest, Infallible Interpreter, and Official Smitether of Justineianity
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
13th March 2004, 11:40 PM
|  | Senior Veteran
| | Join Date: 12th August 2003
Posts: 4,705
Blessings: 97,554
Reps: 907 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Justin04 i hear what your saying. but it has everything to do with being a believer or non believer. if you arent a believer your going to have a totally different opinoin then a creationist on how ''science stuff'' happens. i maybe wrong but thats the way I see it. I think that your saying that believer or not many real science people have problems with him. then thats all fine and dandy but if your a non believer of course you will wont agree w/ him hands down. So if your a believer and disagree then I could understand more. I've said from the start I dont know much about it but that seems to be a pretty simple issue.
Here's where AIG, not merely a christian, but a creationist source attacks Kent Hovind http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1011hovind.asp
There's simply no way to justify how bad a "scientist" the man is. He's a complete fraud. He buys UFO science! His quotes show a massive lack of understanding of high school physics and chemistry (he basically told a guy he was right when he phoned in question of "How does the sun keep burning for 4.5 million years? Wouldn't all of the oxygen been used up?") He's repeatedly been shown to be an absolute fraud. His "doctoral dissertion" was a complete joke. These are not ad homs. These are facts.  |
13th March 2004, 11:44 PM
| | Regular Member
| | Join Date: 24th February 2004
Posts: 360
Blessings: 91,015
Reps: 893 (power: 0) | | | You know what a mind is.
You have one. I have one. It is what we think with.
Which came first and how? |
13th March 2004, 11:45 PM
| | Senior Veteran
| | Join Date: 12th August 2003
Posts: 4,705
Blessings: 97,554
Reps: 907 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by ilwjc Which came first and how. Explain.
I want to debunk you.
Um, what? The mind is the brain. It started out as a simple nerve bundle, the like of which you see in many "lower" lifeforms, like worms. It gradually got bigger and more complicated as the organism got bigger and more complext. |
13th March 2004, 11:46 PM
| | GondolierAce
30
| | Join Date: 9th February 2003
Posts: 4,293
Blessings: 99,190
Reps: 6,626 (power: 20) | | Originally Posted by ilwjc You know what a mind is.
You have one. I have one. It is what we think with
What of other species? Do they have minds?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
High Priest, Infallible Interpreter, and Official Smitether of Justineianity
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
13th March 2004, 11:46 PM
|  | HI
28 
| | Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 92,138
Reps: 5,365 (power: 27) | | Im curious if you read the link and if you still think his challenge is great? Originally Posted by ilwjc Explain to me how the brain came before the mind.
Darwin said the brain came first. Impossible.
(Kent Hovind never said there are transitional fossils. He says they don't exist anywhere.)
__________________
Wei wu wei
Green faeries | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
