Search results

  1. J

    What does it mean to have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ?

    Agreed, but aren't you just pushing the question one step further back? You're just moving me to rephrase the question like this: I don't currently see the Holy Spirit face to face. Nor has He dialed my cell phone. So what makes it personal?
  2. J

    What does it mean to have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ?

    I don't currently see Jesus face to face. Nor has He called me on my cell phone. So what makes it personal?
  3. J

    The Bereans Did Not Practice Sola Scriptura

    Consider the NIV translation of Acts 17:11: “11Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.” In my view, that translation is severely...
  4. J

    Is Sola Scriptura Guilty of Logical Inconsistency?

    (Sigh). Again, in that case your job is easy. Just provide one specific example of where departure from my rule is appropriate. Oh that's right. You don't have an example because none exists, not even hypothetically, by logical necessity. Blowing smoke. As a result, I won't even dignify the...
  5. J

    Is Sola Scriptura Guilty of Logical Inconsistency?

    As expected. You cannot formulate even one specific scenario where departure from my rule of conscience is clearly appropriate. For an obvious reason. My rule states we should never try to do evil. There cannot be any exceptions to this rule.
  6. J

    Is Sola Scriptura Guilty of Logical Inconsistency?

    Then your job should be easy. Just cite one specific example where departure from my rule is clearly the correct course of action. Oh that's right. You don't have an example. You're just blowing smoke. My rule of conscience is logically irrefutable. To avoid contradiction, then, it is YOUR...
  7. J

    Is Sola Scriptura Guilty of Logical Inconsistency?

    So yes I agree that we should seek a well-formed conscience, as you said - but bearing in mind that my rule of conscience is always obligatory.
  8. J

    Is Sola Scriptura Guilty of Logical Inconsistency?

    I don't want to totally discount what you said. Let me clarify my positoin. The ideal scenario would be this: If I feel 100% certain that action-A is evil, and 100% certain B is good, I should opt for B". Since most of us aren't prophets, however, we are not 100% certain of anything. In that...
  9. J

    Is Sola Scriptura Guilty of Logical Inconsistency?

    I am not really sure what you are addressing in these posts. My rule of conscience doesn't actually mention the word conscience, hence anything negative said about conscience isn't a corrective to my position. My rule of conscience is: "If I feel certain that action-A is evil, and B is good, I...
  10. J

    Is Sola Scriptura Guilty of Logical Inconsistency?

    You side-stepped my direct question. As expected. This always confirms my point.
  11. J

    Bread vs WORD of God - in John 6, John 1, Deut 8 - is symbolism used in Last Supper

    Totally incorrect. First of all the third Person's title is best translated "The Holy Wind/Breath" (not Holy Spirit) as the physical spoken Word/Breath of God's mouth (Isaiah 55:11 Ps 33:6). It's virtually impossible to find a valid metaphor for this physical divine Word because, in the task of...
  12. J

    Literary Framework View & Exodus 20:11

    If the Scripture used the word "Trinity" I would believe in the Trinity. Oh that's right. I believe in the Trinity even though Scripture never states that doctrine explicitly.
  13. J

    Literary Framework View & Exodus 20:11

    @helmut, And in that same post (219), you made a similar statement that reads the same to me: "If God created space, he is not inside the space, and if he created our time, he is not inside our time. " To a native English reader, both statements SEEM to be clearly stating that God is somehow...
  14. J

    Literary Framework View & Exodus 20:11

    No? You did NOT make that statement? Could somebody please take a look at post 219 and tell me who is lying here? Because this is what I seem to read: "I refine my analogy: We know a certain object is not in the room we are in (we know the Creator of our universe is not in pour universe). " My...
  15. J

    Literary Framework View & Exodus 20:11

    This is what you said: "We know the Creator of our universe is not in our universe." That's a reference to a person. For example if you had said: "We know that Mike is not in our universe." I would take that to mean that Mike is not in our universe. At this point I don't what you're saying...
  16. J

    Literary Framework View & Exodus 20:11

    Incomprehensible. Any cult could speak of "a higher dimension". Nobody knows what that means. And you just said He is "not within our universe." And yet omnipresent? Sounds like the riddles of a Yoga instructor. You can pretend to comprehend this kind of stuff if you want to. As does the Yoga...
  17. J

    Literary Framework View & Exodus 20:11

    Incomprehensible. He is omnipresent, but not in our universe? He's in a different space-dimension? He walks hand in hand with us, but is in a different time-dimension? Again, I might as well be conversing with a Yoga instructor, or a cult. Nobody understands these nebulous assertions Sheer...
  18. J

    Literary Framework View & Exodus 20:11

    @helmut, Anticipating a typical strawman attack, the title The Holy Wind/Breath is a Third Person title. Tertullian and I are staunch trinitarians. In fact, Tertullian was one of the founders of the doctrine, as he is the first known author to use the word Trinity.