Search results

Let's see if you can figure out why this is a very very bad argument.

"Information" does not appear to need a God either. At least no one with a belief in God has ever found a reason why. Once again, it is your claim, I am not the one to tell you what evidence you should have. I can only analyze the evidence that you produce and explain if it is valid or...

Sorry, but there does not appear to be any higher. Would you believe any book that claimed to be the "word of God"? You need a proper method of comparing religious texts. By your failed methodology any religious text is equivalent to the Bible.

His response videos were very good too. He pulled out all the stops and interviewed quite a few of the scientists involved. I think that even before I ran into Professor Dave Bill Ludlow on his YouTube channel along with Dr. Gary Hurd exposed how Tour lied about Jack Szostak. I...

Their author appears to be just men. There is no indication of anything else.

I do not know. It is your claim. You need to find the appropriate evidence. If someone asked me what the correct evidence for evolution would be I could tell them and why. If I was to try to tell you what was required I would be apt to make various strawman claims and I do not want to do...

Common sense is just an excuse that people use for beliefs that are far too often false or immoral. If people know something the can support it by logic and evidence.

I have noticed that.

It is your claim. The difference is that we have evidence for our claims. What do you have for your "words on paper"?

Oh my! Dishonesty. Why did you ignore the part that was uncomfortable for you?

The evidence required would depend upon the claim. What claim are you asking about?

Your misunderstanding did imply that. But let me help you without any accusations: Having the "burden of proof" means that the person that has that burden must provide evidence that supports their claims. In the legal world the standard is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt". That does not...

The KKK, the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the Witch Hunts are all Christian in their origin. What did Jesus say about judging by their fruits?

Do you realize that the Bible is just a collection of words "on paper". I know, you do not like reality. I can't help you with that.

Whoa, whoa, whoa! Please no personal attacks. You made an error. You could not understand a basic phrase. Your problem may have been that you appear to be thinking to literally. What do you think that the "burden of proof" means?

I see, do you understand basic English? When someone say that the burden of proof is upon someone that is a reference to evidence. There is no absolute "proof" so your use of the term without a qualifier was incorrect.

Wrong, I am not into "proofs". Whatever led you to that conclusion? I am into evidence. And I can provide evidence for my claims.

No. It is mathematics. Something quite different from reality. That is one weird argument. By the way, I do not offer refutations of God either. The burden of proof is always upon a person that says that something exists.

I would disagree on that. For one thing, he was real. It is a bit of a shame that anyone that tries to debate science does not recognize the man immediately.

And may I add it is not a very fine man that doesn't recognize your avatar.