Search results

Fun with math? I guess we could make that 1011 miles in ones day, and 8 cm for the last 4000 years also. Or maybe 500 miles a day for a few days and...etc. Coincidence?

So the prints were either some early man, or some sort of ape. You don't know.

From your link "The radioactive decay rates of nuclides used in radiometric dating have not been observed to vary since their rates were directly measurable--" Man has directly observed for how long!? Ridiculously weak argument.

On the evidence that the bible says man existed then. On the basis that a lot of changes happened since then. So why not have mankind undergo some changes in the heel of the foot and such? That is a lot more basis than you leaping to wild conclusions that no man was here, and some supposed...

Then you are limited in what you know on the issue of the various ways dates are compared and determined.

I don't want to argue with your beliefs. Ratios are evidence that ratios exist, not why they exist. I already told you I believe dad had it right on that issue. Nothing you can say about it. As long as there may have been another nature nothing you say really matters. I am not here to ask you if...

On the issue of suducted plates, and tectonics we already saw in the article that science doesn't understand. What more can you say?

There was a flood. There was a first man as far as anyone knows.

Could be.

Right, slow.

Yes, they are consistent with pre flood man. They do not need to be post flood prints. The issue is that are possibly human prints. You thought there were no physical changes in mankind since Noah's day?

The fact that you cite motion of plates shows you cannot address the evidence and lack of evidences of said motions in the distant past. Or can you? Right, but the rates are used in determining time. You realize that? An example of invoking great ages is here. "The rate of spreading along the...

Because we do not know about how the world of atoms used to work.

Why does it show any rate of movement? Rather it shows changes in isotope ratios, does it not?

You have what to say about it? One technique is drift and things like rates of subduction, is it not?

Name something made up? Did you miss this in the article? "Human feet have a very distinctive shape, different from all other land animals. The combination of a long sole, five short forward-pointing toes without claws, and a hallux ("big toe") that is larger than the other toes, is unique...

Ratios on a graph is not evidence for slow subduction is it?

Changing ratios over thousands of years or hundreds, or weeks, or whatever, do not mean slow movement! The issue is how ratios changed, and how fast.

Then he is in good company, because your are. Now you are stepping on my toes. Maybe apes in costume?

Ridge push and slab pull? Well, how fast was the push or pull? Addressing some issues vaguely many posts back, followed by some childish charges and vague accusations later is hardly really addressing the issues.