Search results

If you think that, then you don't understand science. Scientists would be amazed and excited if that were the case. I can see how a religious person might assume that having your ideas challenged is somehow actually a bad thing.

Read all of it. It's not like it's a hard read, but feel free to skip to the parts that have you most curious. Whatever the case, it would be nice if you stopped incessantly repeating that lie of yours, and I think you would if you actually understood that what you are opposing is purely a...

This will explain what you're trying to understand on a middle-to-high school level, if you actually look at it: Welcome to Evolution 101!

It's not. And we don't disagree with creationists because we hate Christianity. We disagree with creationists because creationism is a myth which religious zealots are trying to wedge into public education as fact. Much of the Arabic speaking world uses "Allah" as an expletive in the same...

It makes perfect sense if you know what "descended" and "heirarchy" mean. What part doesn't make sense to you? The Theory of Evoution is an explanation of the known facts and found evidence that shows common descent through modification and natural selection. A scientific theory is an...

Do you understand the difference between the following two sentences? There is only evidence for natural processes being involved in the development of humanity. There is evidence for only natural processes being involved in the development of humanity. I've asked you this several times...

On the contrary. The internet is full of videos and photos of the natural processes for creating human life. We're just not allowed to link them here.

So, you're saying God didn't make rocks now? I thought you were on the I.D. side.

No, it's not. No, they aren't and even if they were, the fact that they dictate the direction of the water flow makes the streams path not random. No. It flows downward, always taking the first available path downward. It's not random.

That's not science.

The bible says a lot of things. I can only offer a guess as to why it says the stuff it says, and part of that has to do with imagination. So are you the type to refuse any kind of medical treatment? You realize there are people, even today, that substitute medicine with prayer, and those...

You wouldn't have God if it wasn't for human imagination.

More than just chemically... anatomically, genetically, physiologically, cognitively, behaviorally....

I realize English may not be your first language, but I didn't say anything about lifespans being 100 years. I was talking about people who lived 100 years ago. Our lifespans ave doubled since then, allowing us to enjoy life more... Gods didn't grant this to us -- our own ingenuity did...

No it's not... and it's been proven that it's not throughout the history of all man kind. Every explanation for everything ever known has been natural... ever. I'm not even sure how you've even concluded that gods are somehow the "best bet". That's just absurd. The religious don't die...

The bible is not evidence.

I was with you until you chose the word "secularists". You know, many Christians are also secularists. It's not synonymous with atheist, if that's what you meant.

Bears aren't chimps either, and they weren't created as chimps. So I guess they aren't animals either, by your reasoning.

Then you admit there is no evidence. Intelligent design can only be believed on faith.

No, you can't, because you can't even tell these two sentences apart: There is only evidence for natural processes developing humanity. There is evidence for only natural processes developing humanity. This is the mistake you're making in your erroneous notion of what the Theory of Evolution is.