Not sure if Dinesh DSouza counts. If he wasnt allowed to speak then I wouldn't be able to talk over and over about how I trounced him in a public post-lecture discussion we had.
I think they should let people speak. I do have limits tho. I'm not a free speech absolutist.
To some extent its a cult membership purchase, and so partly immune to concerns about business fundamentals.
I do think it has to come down to earth sooner or later, unless theres some great future for "Truth Social" that Im not seeing.
I dont recall the anti apartheid movement in the US as having leaders that anyone could name. The campus movements were publically anonymous in terms of leaders, highly visually prominent, generally non obstructive of important functions, and successful in getting some large institutions to...
Its the annoying style I'm thinking of in particular. I doubt it does any good.
Protest generally can fare better. I think back to the anti apartheid / divestment protest of the 80's. As I recall they played a significant role in pressuring many portfolio managers and corp execs to consider...
I see voters who signed up for a ride with flat out media liars starting around the 90s.
But its hard to say exactly whats peoples fault, as a matter of character weakness in terms of voluntary ignorance, and how much people are just victims of larger forces.
I wish there was some sort of data about whether this style of protest works. But I doubt thats possible to sort out.
I suppose the gambit is the even if the public hates you, there's still some value in getting just the name of your issue out there in the media.