Search results

Mine is from Denmark. And BTW - your graph is seven years old https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/denmark/individual/taxes-on-personal-income

Absolutely as you take home 4,000 a year - good stuff!

He died in 2022 -

I encourage you to look closer - Keep in mind - 61,000 DKK is That's right - if you live in Denmark and you make a whopping $8,772 a year - your tax rate is capped at 52% People in the US making 8,727 pay NOTHING

an income taxes for individuals are at 40% - would you support that also?

I meant next to be prosecuted - his payouts for silencing woman dwarf Trumps.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/apr/11/ban-on-childrens-puberty-blockers-to-be-enforced-in-private-sector-in-england hopefully the US will be as brave and intelligent as the UK

It would be interesting to find someone with face recognition software and compare these illegal protestors with the ones identifying as Antifa - the Occupy - then.... well you get the idea.

Do you think Clinton will be next

If you say so....

Yup, sure is. Nothing to do with Karen at all.

Which case are we talking about?

Right - he made the deal - executed it - all without Trumps approval or knowledge. Repayments consisting of invoices the attorney sent and Trump paid? For the Actions Trump had no knowledge of? Now that is a double scoop!

Oh.... Look here: On Tuesday, Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, filed a lawsuit against Trump saying a "hush" agreement she signed with Cohen was invalid because Trump never signed it.

The inmate has previously testified that he took out the loan without Trump's knowledge - then invoiced him to get his money back - History is so very hard to avoid: From 2018 He also sought to dismiss allegations that his use of a Trump Organization email address to arrange the payment to...

Three months and 62 posts later - I think yo have your answer.

I have yet to see anything offered but name calling and accusation. Facts are established with links.

WOW! There is not an iota of factuality in that and yet I understand that people completely believe it.

They are not beyond reproach and anyone who says so, I believe, is mistaken. They have an ethics board. The board ruled on this 15 years ago.

Unlike other poster who are internet experts every time some they do not like happens - I have no issues what so ever on things that do not exist. Do I really believe that someone in the media or on a internet forum has greater wisdom than the Supreme Court or those who are devoting their life...