Search results

Congratulations, you've failed to demonstrate anything related to your point. Starting from the data instead of the bible is hardly "tossing god out". Besides, I said "many" - Dawkins, I would say, does unequivocally deny any possibility of finding data of or for any sort of God. Maybe...

All I know from the data is that we'll still be around in the year 802,701. It is possible that all YECs have been raptured by this time, as the data suggest that people are happy there.

What you *believe* is, fortunately, irrelevant to what *is*. As for your question, Hubble did. Isaiah may have posited it, though I doubt it, but Hubble was the one who found the data and put forward the conclusion (which, so far as I am aware, has been confirmed through other observations -...

I've often been frustrated by Creationists turning the fallibility of science, the greatest strength of the paradigm, into a weapon to attack it. However, that in combination with your point reminds me very much of an observation I once heard about (political) revolutions: when an oppressive...

I believe that in the far distant future, robots built by humans (then extinct) will open a portal through time and "inject" the original living molecule into the environment of early Earth. Therefore, I feel that atheistic evolution, being a crucial element in explaining how the robots came to...

I don't know of many scientists who *have* tossed God, yours or anyone's, "out of the picture". But there has yet to be one single bit of evidence suggesting that any sort of God *needs* to be a part of any scientific theory. In the absence of evidence for, the idea is dismissed. If, some day...

Newton is widely known to have been a firm believer in alchemy, but "science" rejects it. TEACH THE CONTROVERSY! DOWN WITH CHEMISTRYISTS!

My assumption is that his sentence was meant as an imperative, and should have had a semi-colon. "See so-and-so; read thus-and-that." I guess it's sometimes useful to use correct grammar.

This reminds me of an Asimov quote, one of my favorites: "…when people thought the earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the earth is flat, then your view...

Recent Creation Science has found that cherries are in fact a form of the fruit kind, not fish at all, thus disproving evolution.

Ah, I thought it was something like that. Thanks.

Aren't they not technically cells at all? Biology is not my strong suit (that would be diamonds), but I have a vague memory of that floating around.

I went to the Cheesecake Factory for my birthday about ten years ago. I was *most* disappointed not to find a stinking production floor full of grumbling industrial fabrication equipment churning out delicious cheesecake.

All part of the atheist octopus conspiracy. Clearly you've fallen for it hook, line, and sinker. As far as I'm concerned, proof that any Creator must hate humanity is in the knee. Honestly, it's the product of a madman.

That 9-11 cake is by far the most villainous pastry I've yet encountered. And that includes the meat pie from Titus Andronicus. Mmm. Villainy.

What, exactly, has been discovered by science? The validity of irreducible complexity? No, I'm afraid not. If that is so, please, please provide evidence. Peer-reviewed scientific research, for example. If it stacks up scientifically, I'll change my tune. But I doubt you'll bother. The ToE...

Surely you jest. Creationists just respond by saying that any so-called "Christian" who accepts evolution isn't really a Christian at all. They're even worse than atheists, who are at least honest about their Satanic beliefs - these folks are *heretics*!

First, welcome to the forums! Prepare to be dog-piled. :) No, most people consider Evolution to be a scientific theory which has not been disproved by any of the available evidence. The relationship between evolutionary theory and atheism is as follows: . You see, there's nothing there...

That would be Truth Above All Else. I was surprised to see an Orthodox Creationist, but what can you do?

Thanks. A bit late, but thanks. ;)