Search results

Now that we have had our little laugh .... The Fish in Jonah was not God either.

Balaam's talking Donkey is not the angel. The donkey is still the donkey. Possibly, the devil messed with the snake's genes, thus no feet. That would have been science. We all know science is evil. Scientists, they would be the devil.

Everything he says tells me he is stumped. :thumbsup: You, sir, are a true soldier.

sYou're doing a good job. Tough crowd though.

Evolutionist rhetoric does not evolve.

Always the witty rejoinders.

Isn't there a much simpler definition? Why isn't a miracle just a divergence from human expectation, or especially the consensus expectation? For example, if God arranged to have an eclipse happen on the day His Son was to be crucified, to make a point, that would be "normal", in that it would...

Agreed about the "proofs." The odds that the consensus is correct just get longer all the time. The proofs just get less reliable, not more. I agree that the rocks in my back yard really look much older than a few thousand years. But, I don't really know why and it is pretty clear that the...

Been doing well, thank you very much. How are you? Still active duty? The Cosmology thing has gotten lost in a lot of other happenings. Its funny that there is a Christianity section on an investing website, and it is all far more polite than what happens here. And people know how to take...

ESO - eso1217 - Serious Blow to Dark Matter Theories? "The most accurate study so far of the motions of stars in the Milky Way has found no evidence for dark matter in a large volume around the Sun. According to widely accepted theories, the solar neighbourhood was expected to be filled with...

It only gets subtle when science needs to backpedal. Mindlinght had a simple and valid point. All I hear is homina homina homina from you guys when you get schooled yet again. GSRindex

YouTube - BigBangFraud Enjoy.

Hi Mark. Nice to hear from you. We aren't talking, really. Unless evolutionists talking past you is still talking. YouTube - Speed of Light Slowing Down?

Scientists Question Nature's Fundamental Laws | Space.com You can google from there smart guy.

Mr. theistic, I really dont have a lot of interest in reading your posts. I hope I can encourage you to feel the same way about mine. There really are no evolutionists on line that have much interest in dialogue. Some people do want real information. See below. I took down the billy Meyer...

Here you go Champ, sure wouldn't want to disappoint courteous fellow Christians like yourself. http://www.stanford.edu/group/chugroup/amo/amo.paper/APB2006.pdf Atomic Physics: Steven Chu Group at Stanford University A New Kind of Science: The NKS Forum - 770-771 and Planck's Constant Quantum...

The facts are these: 1. Darwin's half-baked theory gets much homage after all the neo-Darwinists essentially drop major tenets of his theory and then proceed to ex nihilo rationales for neo-darwinism. 2. Setterfield was one of like 3 pioneers on this subject, which the guild of science...

Why is that of any more relevance than his politics? You guys always like to avoid the essential issue, which is variance in fundamental constants. Here is another article, from Stanford this time. The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements I don't expect your manners to...

The article doesn't really explain how the mass went missing, or if in fact they really think it did. That part goes unsolved. They probably assume bad measurements. The article does say that the answer is in a definition by so-called constants because there is no such thing as a given mass...

Huzzah for snotty students. YouTube - snotty nose