Search results

Then it is bad, since religion and reality don't mix well.

Please, explain why it was deemed necessary? Why do you think it is done this way? Why is it common practice? Yeah, it is dishonest... Our goal is to reach the truth. It doesn't matter if the prosecution fails to reach it. The means are there, while the means aren't there if you were...

If one did not require a driver's license(and the tests required) to operate a car, how many people not suitable to operate a car would have access to one? Same thing with logical tools as the 'burden of proof'. People that don't know how to use it, have access to use it and create threads...

You seem to make 'burden of proof' as some worthless come back to try to evade such question as the OP. Does it enfuriate you when someone uses it? Does it also bother you when other people do not adhere to your other logic fallicies that you stand for? You seem to be stuck in the middle ages...

I really can't believe people still ask these type of questions...

Current book: 'The Selfish Gene' by Richard Dawkins

atheism is lack of belief in gods. whether god exists or not, that is unknowable to us. what you are describing is strong atheism.

atheism is such a broad term. but the way i feel about it is like this: everyone in this world is born into this massive multiplayer role playing game(religion) started off by men back in the time of superstion. similar to the vampire rpg's that kids play... but the only difference that is...

Niiiice, I like! In my country, a man without a mustache is, how do you say.. a man who loves other man.

aren't pigs Allah's creation? Hmmm... and here I thought everything Allah created was 'good'.... here's one of the bits of evidence that shows Allah's imperfection then... he should have at least destroyed the evidence, but he didn't... I guess this shows he is not omnipotent? or the simplest...

uuuhhhh, i'm interested. btw, i'm really skeptical... so i hope you know what emperical evidence really means.

I think in order to try to show evidence that Jesus was crucified or not.. one has to prove that the man existed in the first place. Because it's impossible for someone that never existed to have been crucified.

Cool video, I think I had seen it before... It would be cool if in this Battle of the Gods Harry Potter popped in and engaged in the battle by himself and made it as one of the last god standing.

I guess the same way you would prove the existence of God.

[/COLOR] I am not a muslim. Would you respect Jesus by calling him Son of God even though you are not christian? It would be helpful if you tried to look at the bigger picture. There is a world outside of the one that you live in - and your world does not apply to ours. Only people that...

Yeah, I wish... but he is not a one true god :( Many people would have to believe in him or had to have believed in him... but he is just not popular.

People that don't know what they are talking about shouldn't speak either. The world would have less mistakes.

yes, and all one true gods would be engaged in this ultimate event. I believe Krishna would be infused with the powers of Brahman and would have the abilities of Shiva, Vishnu and others... he would be able to block multiple attacks using the hands of Shiva.

If Krishna, Allah, yhwh and the greek Gods(in unison) were to battle each other in the Ultimate Battle, what tatic do you think each would use(or special ability/power) and who would come out victorious?

I kind of feel bad for srev2004 for having to deal with people like this... srev might as well have said that Hinduism applies to everyone because he portrays it as an objective truth too. :doh: