Search results

Except that reason has brought you the comfort in which you live, while faith seems to bring you to ignorant statements.

Why don't you act like a real man and just confess you've got nothing to back up your earlier claim, instead of just /threading-out like an intellectual coward?

Ah, AV's hypotheticals. Should we trust someone that invents a new challenge everyday, keeps getting "pwned" in that thread, and then /threads out? Perhaps just point and laugh?

Typically AV: can't respond? Ignore. Only shows how weak your position is, AV.

How about we don't vote on this poll. We all know AV will use it for one or the other against anyone that votes.

What are unicorns, the tooth fairy, hobbits, leprechauns, that sneaky teapot orbiting Mars and Jack Dawson made of?

*delete*

And light was there before the sun and stars were created. Plants before photosynthesis. We'll all say those are impossible too. We gladly do as well.

I don't care about what Bible-verses could be applied to me... but alright: In all seriousness then: do you agree that photosynthesis was added later?

In fact, plants where there before the sun. Guess photosynthesis was put in later as well, huh? Quite different. Perhaps the sun was a spotted purple?

Ah! You should've said that the first time. I don't think the mods like you dragging this discussion to culinary matters, though. (Serously, though, please tell me you speak like that in real life too. That would be awesome)

The "opinion" part would be quantifying "almost none". Let me put it otherwise: The very large majority of scientists with relevant degrees in fields related to evolution, do not find there is a scientific controversy surrounding the theory of evolution. I'll let you google "project steve"...

As the old Fark-anecdote goes: Seriously now: There are smart people that are religious. There are smart people that are creationists. There are almost no creationists that are smart and knowledgeable in a field that relates to the evolution/creationism-debate. That's not an opinion...

Aw, shucks. AV can't take it anymore. Should've stayed away, AV. We'll just chalk up another loss for you, then.

We know some things in the Bible didn't happen literally. We would notice if a worldwide flood happened. We would see evidence that everything was created in 6 days. Ofcourse, "true believers" can weasel out of that "thanks" to their ignorance of science, reason or worse and just claim "it's a...

Wow, AV. You hit a new low, and that's quite an accomplishment, considering your other ramblings. Admit it: you don't really think this will open anyones eyes.

AV says he holds science to a higher regard. Everyone and his mother knows that AV doesn't know the first thing about science. That's not the answer AV will want to hear (he might call me a "newbie" as well) but that's how it is.

No, I didn't. I'm sure you can back up this accusation, because I know you wouldn't be lying yourself, would you? Although... you're human. Then there could be deceit... You've got nothing.

Ah! You're being nice by making yourself look foolish by giving dumb answers, I assume then? Where? Sure there is: you don't know what you're talking about. Which is shown here again: Saying something while you know it's wrong is lying, "teacher". We are apes. Because they can...

Robert Schlieman found the foundations of various Troys. Including one that seems to have been burned down to the ground in a war. I guess that means the Illiad is a true story. Literally true, even! Hail Zeus, huh, dad?