Search results

God made us from mud, therefore we are pottery.

He is right. Humans did not evolved from monkeys but humans and monkeys share a common ancestor (which was probably quite monkeylike).

I just can't understand the problem, scientific definitions and classifications change as new evidence is gathered. It is the strength of the scientific method; yet he acts as if it's a weakness.

So... it's 2012 and Pluto is still an issue here? Just read my sig.

Maybe he should have posted a picture of a complete skeleton rather than one with the clavicle and sternum removed.

It's not that. It is the fact that the only two arguments that could support creationism are: 1. There is no evidence for creation. 2. God purposely falsified evidence of evolution. It does not take pages of posts to argue those two points because there is no argument.

So are you saying we should pray to Mars? Or should we pray to Jupiter? I seriously have a hard time, even with some of the things some creationists believe, that anybody can believe this bunk. I am fearful if we have people like this walking around in the general population.

Dad is still on this? Last time I mopped with floor with his "different state past" nonsense. Somebody needs to commit themselves...

Humans don't exist because the Bible says they do!

Only a creationist would claim that everything somebody said is 100% correct.

AoS is either a nut-job or the best poe ever. Let him go on with his illogical rants and weird source material. It is fun to read and I would bet my house no one here takes him seriously.

:doh:

It would be much easier for an "evolutionist" to understand a creationist lecture than it would be for a creationist to understand a lecture on evolution.

I cannot argue in support of creationism because there is no support. The closest thing I can argue is that God created an appearance of evolution to make others faith in the him even stronger.

I'm surprised nobody mentioned the one where if you breed goats in front of stripped branches, they have speckled offspring.

So those children deserved to die for making fun of Elisha's bald head?

Most of us here would classify ourselves as "agnostic atheists". Most of the creationists here would probably classify themselves as "gnostic theists". At least we accept the idea that we may be wrong about our beliefs.

The problem with this is that the "hyper-evolution" of the species today from their prospective kinds is not supported by the Bible. If you allow this liberal extra-Biblical addition (just as with "embedded age" and "renewal creation") why not just say all of Genesis is an allegory? If you...

26 Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground." Genesis 1:26 Doesn't the one created show the likeness of...