Search results

He absolutely lied about the "vaccinated becoming dead ends for the virus". https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/553773-fauci-vaccinated-people-become-dead-ends-for-the-coronavirus/ It was a lie when he made the claim. As time progressed and more data was collected, evidence...

People "attack" Fauci because he has lied repeatedly on numerous topics related to Covid. He lied in congressional testimony regarding US funding GoF research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. He lied in multiple media appearances claiming the vaccinated become "dead ends" for the virus...

You might want to take a look at UK Surveillance Reports. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-surveillance-reports From Sept 2021 - March 2022, they published Covid data outcomes by vaccine status. Even in their first release of data (week 36, 2021, infections...

Dr. Peter Hotez was one of the "experts" the US government relied on to broadcast their Covid-19 vaccination strategy. Probison thoroughly demonstrated that he was wildly inconsistent with his claims. What was consistent was the certainty with which he made each claim, despite the newer claims...

It's not confusing at all. In 3 days, he changed from "looks engineered" to "lab leak is crackpot theory". Then, he began work on Proximal Origins, which took weeks. His own description of the work he was doing related to Proximal Origins was "trying to disprove lab leak theory". It was a...

FOIA emails show that those claiming LL was "conspiracy theory" were never "following the science". They were trying to shut down debate and declare zoonotic origin definitive. There was no "scientific consensus", just a handful of state sponsored scientists who pushed a narrative. That you...

Wrong. They didn't do a "retraction". They emailed Fauci privately saying they thought it looked engineered. Their first statement to the public was that it was "conspiracy theory" to think it came from a lab. Andersen and Holmes have never, despite multiple interviews on the topic...

That's an outright falsehood. It became a partisan issue when Democrats aligned behind the skewed "Proximal Origins" Lancet article which was intended to shut down debate on the origin of Covid. The authors of this article had initially thought that the virus looked "potentially engineered"...

FOIA emails show that Andersen submitted that paper to Fauci for review prior to publishing. Fauci didn't write the article, he coordinated the writing of it.

No amount of email documentation obtained via FOIA showing the obvious obfuscation done by Fauci, Andersen, etc. will change these people's minds. The paper trail, despite being heavily redacted, makes it clear that their private exchanges completely contradicted their public statements. Those...

Need a cite for Sweden "later had to resort to masks and lock-downs". That's revisionist history. They now stand as one of the best performing countries in terms of excess deaths since the start of the pandemic.

Wrong. There was evidence for lab leak for a long time now (June 2021), most of which was dismissed out of hand by proponents of Fauci, such as yourself. Internal emails showed that many of the prominent proponents of zoonotic origin privately said they thought it was "potentially engineered"...

Those in red areas have had higher mortality rates for decades. Pretending that it's related to Covid interventions is nonsense. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-in-republican-counties-have-higher-death-rates-than-those-in-democratic-counties/

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.18.512756v1

Not only were they experimenting with coronaviruses, the specific change which makes Covid unique (insert of FCS) was part of a grant proposal to DARPA from the same people involved with the research at the WIV. Email correspondence from those involved showed a clear disparity between internal...

Probinson followed the thread, but accurately noted that you don't remember what you said or posted in the thread. This is you: Probinson later responded: To which you said: Probinson made a claim. You cited a paper/study claiming that it refuted Probinson's claim. When called out that...

You're creating a strawman. Just because pharmaceutical companies have put profit over health (a simple review of Pfizer's fraudulent practices shows this to be true) doesn't make every employee of that country a "sub human demon who puts profit over health".

Yeah, "despite"...

The FDA is so happy with the data they've received that they wanted to wait 75+ years to release the data to the public and fought (and lost) a battle in court to do so. Why a Judge Ordered FDA to Release Covid-19 Vaccine Data Pronto You're free to trust them. I'm sure there are no conflicts...

"you are 10 times as likely to die from Covid if you have not been vaccinated". Sure, keep believing that. To the point, you're citing the CDC which has admitted to not actually sharing the full data. UK is still showing data (they'll be stopping in April) and that rate of protection is down...