Search results

Both. This thread is an obvious example of trolling, while in other threads he has flat out refused to address posts which utterly destroy his arguments, which is clearly a deliberate attempt to stay as ignorant as possible.

That was covered. Mutations occur, and with natural selection in place the harmful ones are bred out because the more successful creatures tend to be those with the "better" genes. In the case of humans we don't have natural selection any more because almost any human born can survive to...

I remind you that you still haven't actually managed to address my reasons for why carbon dating works in your thread on it. You ignored my post for the rest of the time you actually bothered to participate in your own thread, which leads me to believe that you don't even know the first thing...

Depends how you define law of nature. If you mean that evolution doesn't happen, you're flat out wrong. Evolution has been observed as happening whenever we have a reproducing society of lifeforms. It's just unavoidable. It still happens with humans, but because natural selection has...

This does. If you're talking about natural laws, you're talking about science, and science has no law which states that matter systems tend to disorder, only that energy tends to flow from a hotter body to a cold one. Your concept of "order" hasn't even been defined properly yet, so it's...

He already showed in another thread that he knew nothing about radioisotope dating beyond a few words. I wouldn't worry too much about his comments about it!

I don't claim to fully understand the expansion, but one of the things I've heard before is that it's space itself that is expanding rather than the universe physically moving apart. As such, the usual speed limits become a little difficult to measure, because the distance between 2 objects...

This is only a claim, not fact. The fact is that every time this has been studied, the effect of prayer appears to have been statistically insignificant! Do your own study then. Get in touch with James Randi before you do and see if he'll agree to your experiment being eligible for the...

It's not. Why? Because we find these creatures IN the mountains, and the fossilised species contained in the rocks correspond to those we'd expect in rocks of that age. We don't find a random sample of creatures from all geological ages, which is what we'd expect if these creatures were...

If you're claiming this and stating that it's not entropy that you're talking about, then essentially you're making up scientific laws and claiming that other people need to look into it for you. This is simply unacceptable if you're trying to find honest discussion. You need to state what you...

These are both incredible naive arguments, and have been thoroughly disproved on many occasions now. However, creationists keep using them. Essentially the reason they don't work is that they assume a constant steady-state for the entirety of Earth's existence. This is simply not the case...

How many schools teach evolution 5 days a week for 6 hours?

I read down to the "Seven Assumptions" list. What a complete load ;)

Now THERE's a personal question... :P

You are wrong. You have ignored my mathematical post for long enough for everyone to realise that you know nothing about this subject and are speaking from a position of deliberate ignorance. Your opinion on this matter is utterly worthless, and there really is no point in your being here...

You presented some crap. I disputed it and showed the maths behind carbon dating. So far, you've provided nothing else. Your arguments have been useless, you have evaded all the questions, and you have the nerve to claim victory? Run along, troll...

All these insults and you still haven't been able to show the flaw in my maths. Simple solution of a first order differential equation with known boundary conditions. Should have been a breeze for anyone with any degree of competence to disprove IF it was incorrect. That means that either...

Not really, no...

Which bit of my derivation do you disagree with? Or will you just concede that you're talking rubbish about something you don't truly understand?

Oh good, an economist is going to act like an expert on science works now because he knows a few things about graphs. This is almost as good as a chef performing surgery because he's occasionally cut up meat before... Oh, and he seemed to get extrapolation mixed up with fairly reliable maths...