Search results

That's an easy one: If someone claimed to possess the knowledge that water does not exist I would be speechless or at least a little dumbfounded and suspect that they belong in a mental institute.

Well...I haven't posted in five years or so... But aside from that I would suggest a little of both and some of neither. Therefore I voted, "No Opinion."

I'm having a bit of trouble answering this question because that which is perfect either can not be imagined to get better, in within its nature it can not get better (gooder if you prefer), it is the maximum goodness. Thus that which is perfect is also good, so in this case at least Good is...

Very well then, here is a curious question for you. What is a good person?

...From the sound of it, our Grandparents were alot smarter in regards to sex than us.:scratch:

I've been here two years and I just come here once in a while now, but basically it's gotten to the point where there is nothing new here, I've seen all the responses and all the challenges (ie Vainglorious' attack on faith bellow). The Christian's have also always been outnumbered, so they...

The problem is that atheists will never be able to do something because it is "good," they will only be able to do things because it does not harm someone or serves somebody.

Well this is interesting. Let’s see, your morality is based on the Principle of Reciprocity, correct? And this principle is based on philosophers along with Theological Texts, correct? 1. If this is the case why do you also reject the other parts of these texts that say homosexuality is...

1. Is your definition objective or subjective? If you argue that it is subjective then if the Catholic Church has a different definition of evil, then they may be perfectly just in calling Gay marriage evil. 2. On what grounds is gay marriage considered a right? 3. And once again the Golden...

Actually this web site only talks about the Bible...Of course you must realize that the Bible came from the Catholic Church, so what's up there, the web site is hard pressed for authority.

Ok, I've been wondering, because one of the major arguments that I've seen against evolution is one that says the universe isn't old enough for evolution to have taken place.

Yes? Keep going, you are the one who is now making the positive statement, so if we play by the normal atheist rules, that makes the burden of proof fall upon you.

So here is my question, assuming that evolution is true, how long would it take for random chemicals to turn into the necissary amino acids, and then from that into a living organism?

So can you prove this? If not, then many could place you in the same boat as not knowing right from wrong. Just curious as to whether you have any actual arguments.

I agree with what is said by the Church. Atheists can really have no say because they don't believe in any objective morallity. And people who believe the Bible can't really oppose the Church either because they have to reject the Bible to do so.

I'm tempted to think that this is an April Fools Joke....But because of its gravity I'll assume that it isn't. My only question is: "Do you still choose to love?"

1. Actually according to Christianity evil does not have substance; rather it is the privation of Good. Secondly, according the Christianity God did know that Satan would rebel. 2. Being angry about something happening does not necessarily imply ignorance. Also note that many people consider...

Actually I would argue that they would go after Christians the most. Saints is particular.

At what point can fasting be said to be overdone? Also, has any of the fathers or doctors of the church written anything regarding this?

Quite right, the Eucharist is the perfection of the passover.