Search results

Except that that's not what Romney said. He said Obama said "vote for Revenge." which he categorically did not do. "saving yourself" from fully educating yourself outside of soundbites isn't doing yourself any favours.

so then, is it not accurate to state that the mindest of the post is that 95% of the black population has been duped.

"fallen for" is basically a statement of saying they have been duped.

oh darn. 30 seconds and youtube... and you can find the full speech... not just the clip and snip that Romney wants you to see. President Obama in Springfield, OH - Full Speech 11/2/2012 - YouTube as well as context...

How can you defend your assertion based on the people living around you while simultaneously denouncing his based on the same principle?

And you don't think that considering the entire black population (less 5%) as nothing more than duped and deluded, isn't an offensive mindset?

he was referring to the polls, Jeff. Which is what I responded to.

I only say that... because you indicate that possibility for Romney... with zero poll data to back it up.

More Faux-outrage. Context, full statements were provided... and instead, start another thread, assert the same ridiculous premise.

Or, does the further shift of all other minority groups towards democrats, have any impact as well?

sooo.... there is no chance in your mind of Obama +300 electoral votes in your mind.

I don't know. I haven't spoken to any of them. The only thing I base my opinion on, is the numbers. Those numbers that indicate that the minority votes have been strongly democrat for a long time, regardless of the skin colour of the candidate.

It's more than that. There is too much focus and angst about the black vote... when in reality, ALL minorities, from ethnic, to economical, to sexual preference, are voting democrat by large margins.

So then, you've managed to identify that once in a blue moon, things happen contrary to expectation. Is that REALLY what Romney would want to hang his hat on? Well.... it's not really likely to happen, but it COULD, you know.

which, at no point, was disputed.

You are baffled at something that I am not doing. Looked awfully white to me. oh no... facts! which, we have already determined, was around 95%.

I fact checked this for you when you mentioned it before. Need I do it again?

No. His was this historic low, at 83%. Before you make an issue of that, that doesn't mean 17% voted Republican, there was a very large independant vote that year from Minorities. Again, I've already stated that there would be SOME who would vote for Obama based on the colour of his skin...

Other than the fact that I am doing no such thing... I am not a democrat. Any time you'd like to address the actual facts, drop me a line.