A Nation For Sale Under Hillary

If Trump is so anti-Clinton foundation, why did he donate $100K? Was he trying to buy influence?

The State Department said that no irregularities were found. And while Trump's devotees would grasp at any straw (and magnify it into a bale of hay) to criticize Hillary, I think others are more discerning.

What Trump needs to do is stop making speeches to 100% white audiences about how he wants to get black people to support him.

From the article:

"The Democratic Party often warns us that mixing big money and politics will corrupt democracy. They must have nominated Hillary Clinton to prove it."
.

LivingWordUnity said:

From the article:

"The Democratic Party often warns us that mixing big money and politics will corrupt democracy. They must have nominated Hillary Clinton to prove it."
.

Click to expand...

and it's not like we don't have plenty of past examples in history to prove that.
somehow it's always the lure of money that tips the scale of greed into the negative.
Judas proved that.

the lessson here is if someone has to offer you extra money to do something, think very hard indeed before accepting.

This was good

I do not understand how anyone with a sense of right and wrong could pull the lever for Hillary.

concretecamper said:

I do not understand how anyone with a sense of right and wrong could pull the lever for Hillary.

Click to expand...

Well considering most of the people voting for her are completely OK killing babies...

Maybe some believe she is the lesser evil

I am opt to believe Trump should be running against Bernie (personally) given the DNC leaks, which was followed up by the death of the lead attorney on behalf of the Bernie supporters who had served the DNC with a law suit over the fraud.

Clinton doesnt seem concerned at all, it seems like a wrap.

concretecamper said:

I do not understand how anyone with a sense of right and wrong could pull the lever for Hillary.

Click to expand...

I do not see how anyone with a sense of right and wrong could pull the lever for Hillary OR Trump. Tweedle-De and Tweedle-Dum. Time for looking at not throwing your vote away voting against the other one.

Hmmm...

• George H.W. Bush has a foundation while his son "W" is President. No one ever checked to see whether donors met with "W" (and of course some must have, because to exclude them because they were H.W. donors would have been just as wrong.
• There were many embassy attacks and almost 100 deaths during the Bush administration, but Congress never spent millions on investigating them, much less more time than 9/11, the Kennedy assassination, and Pearl Harbor.
• Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice had private emails, and Congress, the FBI, and the Justice Department never paid a bit of mind.

Let's remember, too, that following these investigations, no "pay for play" was found, no emails clearly marked classified, no wrongdoing.

Because her name is Clinton, she is plagued with 100 times the scrutiny of any other candidate, and so, when I look at the tens of millions spent to nail her, with no results, I just shrug my shoulders and say, "Is that all they got for their money and time?"

Hillary was not my first choice for President, but compared to the extreme reservations I have about Trump's fitness for office (not even considering how far his positions differ from mine) I have absolutely no problem wholeheartedly supporting her.

She'll be the money launderer in chief if she wins. And he'd be the first man-harlot.

Fantine said:

I have absolutely no problem wholeheartedly supporting her.

Click to expand...

When was the last presidential candidate I wholeheartedly supported? Was it even Carter the first time around? Most of the time I support them with reservations. It's pretty special that Hillary gets someone to wholeheartedly support her. Not that many do.

AvilaSurfer said:

She'll be the money launderer in chief if she wins. And he'd be the first man-harlot.

Click to expand...

The Clinton Foundation supplies life-saving anti-retroviral drugs to HIV patients around the world--50% of the adults, 75% of the children, after negotiating for lower prices for these victims around the globe from drug companies.

That means that Hillary Clinton saves 18 million lives around the globe each year. Sounds like a pretty clean use of Foundation funds to me.

Here

http://www.politifact.com/global-ne...n-clinton-foundation-helped-9-million-lower-/

The Clinron Money Laundering Organization is a pay for play scam.