Trump hates women

Miss Shelby · May 19, 2016

He is a disgusting womanizer and rapist. I can't believe I have been supporting him. He sexually harassed this one woman, I think her name was Paula Jones then lied about it. He also invited a young woman to a Little Rock hotel room, dropped his drawers, and told her to 'kiss it'. There's another lady named Gennifer Flowers who has a similar story. One lady even claimed to be violently raped by him and as he was leaving, advised her to put some ice on her bloody lip. Then one time in his office he was making business calls at his desk and this very young girl named Monica something or other performed oral sex on him. She did it voluntarily but he lied to everyone about it so she got mad and offered a blue dress with some of his seed on it.

I cannot believe that anyone would want him (or his stupid spouse) in the White House.

Michie · May 19, 2016

Hmmm....

benedictaoo · May 19, 2016

Miss Shelby said:
He is a disgusting womanizer and rapist. I can't believe I have been supporting him. He sexually harassed this one woman, I think her name was Paula Jones then lied about it. He also invited a young woman to a Little Rock hotel room, dropped his drawers, and told her to 'kiss it'. There's another lady named Gennifer Flowers who has a similar story. One lady even claimed to be violently raped by him and as he was leaving, advised her to put some ice on her bloody lip. Then one time in his office he was making business calls at his desk and this very young girl named Monica something or other performed oral sex on him. She did it voluntarily but he lied to everyone about it so she got mad and offered a blue dress with some of his seed on it.

I cannot believe that anyone would want him (or his stupid spouse) in the White House.

Yeah but like one woman said, all that about Bill Clinton and more but you don't invite a rapist to your wedding if you really feel that way. I'm ride or die for Trump but Hills will get him on that. But yeah,don't come at me with Trump and women. Bills is the one who is bad on women and everybody says he made a great president, best ever so if I were running Trump's campaign I'd go with that, being bad on women is proven to not effect your job as pres and hey, who remembers character doesn't count when bozo's were relecting Bills? So treating 21 year old girls and women like trash and calling them liers and having no character is not a prez requirement. Next? They can take several seats with that. They both need to drop that.

Miss Shelby · May 19, 2016

I hope it doesn't come in their debate. Trump is easily provoked and you know she is gonna bait him hard.

Miss Shelby · May 20, 2016

Hillary follows the money and at the time of his third wedding she was riding the Trump train hard. Cause he was greasing her palm. The guy ain't perfect. she went out of obligation.Bill didn't go to the wedding but he made it to the reception. Reportedly with his pants still unzipped. Plus it was more Hillarys campaign in 2005 anyways so what does he care?

benedictaoo · May 20, 2016

Riding the Trump train hard... You know how bad that sounds? Lol.

Fantine · May 23, 2016

Besides the inaccurate headline, I'm just curious as to why you believe that your allegations against Bill Clinton (who is not a candidate for president) absolve Donald Trump of his actions against women.

Is serial monogamy any less an offense against God's law than marital infidelity?

Although, since he invoked the 5th amendment 97 times in his divorce trial against Ivana, perhaps both marital infidelity and serial monogamy apply to Trump.

Not to mention the classless way he divorced his second wife, Marla Maples. He didn't have the class to tell her in person, so he told a gossip columnist and let Maples find out about it in the next day's newspaper.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...en-adultery-objectification-article-1.2604073

But I thank you for your post, Miss Shelby. If the worst thing you can say about a candidate is an attack against her husband's behavior, I'll take it as a recommendation.

AvilaSurfer · May 23, 2016

I'm kinda looking forward to a debate. I'm pretty sure he'll crush Hillary.

Fantine · May 24, 2016

If the winner is judged by how vicious he can be, you might be right.

If the winner is judged by knowledge, ideas, experience, and proposed solutions, he doesn't stand a chance.

There is a fixed number of people who are swayed by vicious personal attacks uninterrupted by knowledge and competence...

That number is, of course, much larger than it should be, but I don't see it growing.

benedictaoo · May 25, 2016

Fantine said:
Besides the inaccurate headline, I'm just curious as to why you believe that your allegations against Bill Clinton (who is not a candidate for president) absolve Donald Trump of his actions against women.

Is serial monogamy any less an offense against God's law than marital infidelity?

Although, since he invoked the 5th amendment 97 times in his divorce trial against Ivana, perhaps both marital infidelity and serial monogamy apply to Trump.

Not to mention the classless way he divorced his second wife, Marla Maples. He didn't have the class to tell her in person, so he told a gossip columnist and let Maples find out about it in the next day's newspaper.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...en-adultery-objectification-article-1.2604073

But I thank you for your post, Miss Shelby. If the worst thing you can say about a candidate is an attack against her husband's behavior, I'll take it as a recommendation.

Because nothing about Trump is against women. What Bills did and hiills defended bills, was when he called Monica the liar. Not the he lied, but call a 21 year old girl the liar. How derogatory can one get? And equal pay for women? Excuse me...Hills and Bills pay women 38 cents less on the dollar then men at their crooked, under FBI investigation non charity foundation that pays their daughter 700,000,00 a year. Clintons OLNY care about the Clintons.

benedictaoo · May 25, 2016

And besides fantine, we established already back when bills was running for relection that character does not count and when bill got caught and lied on that girl, that it was only sex? What's the big deal? It does not stop you from running the country. Y'all made these ground breaking rules. Kennedy was a womanizer, y'all say he was great. Clinton, well we know what he is, y'all say he was great. So what about that won't make him great? You all established that woman using, womanizing, calling women liars, not paying women the same as you pay men at your under FBI investigation no charity foundation, men can still be great Presidents. So you can't play that card.

benedictaoo · May 25, 2016

And...calling women, who deserve it, names, means you can't be great on the economy? And...Megan Kelly? Guess what? He's making her career. You think she would have got prime time network show with out him? I'd say he's great for women...

s_gunter · May 25, 2016

Dang, I wish you guys/gals defended our Pope like you do Trump....

Sword of the Lord · May 25, 2016

s_gunter said:
Dang, I wish you guys/gals defended our Pope like you do Trump....

Trump is able to be defended from a political perspective. The things Francis says are often not able to be defended from a Christian perspective.

s_gunter · May 25, 2016

Mikhael Reborn said:
Trump is able to be defended from a political perspective. The things Francis says are often not able to be defended from a Christian perspective.

Wow. In a Catholic forum...

Sword of the Lord · May 25, 2016

s_gunter said:
Wow. In a Catholic forum...

Yes. In a Catholic forum, where there is a lot of concern over the things HE says.

benedictaoo · May 26, 2016

s_gunter said:
Dang, I wish you guys/gals defended our Pope like you do Trump....

If he was running for elected office in the US I would... And if this wasn't such a false, apples to oranges comparison I'd elaborate more and if this wasn't the absolute wrong place to discuss the pope...

s_gunter · May 26, 2016

benedictaoo said:
If he was running for elected office in the US I would... And if this wasn't such a false, apples to oranges comparison I'd elaborate more and if this wasn't the absolute wrong place to discuss the pope...

Yeah, I gotcha.

I'm merely dismayed that the current Pope can be practically trashed in this forum, but yet Trump gets fiery defenses. That was seeming very weird and backwards to me when I posted that. I guess I read too many threads at once, too many tabs open.

benedictaoo · May 26, 2016

s_gunter said:
Yeah, I gotcha. I'm merely dismayed that the current Pope can be practically trashed in this forum, but yet Trump gets fiery defenses. That was seeming very weird and backwards to me when I posted that. I guess I read too many threads at once, too many tabs open.

Were going to discuss the pope here? Well okay. I'm careful not to trash him. I don't think Catholics here have "trashed" him. That's a big word there, "trashed". That is debatable, if he's been trashed. JPll was trashed, Benedict trashed. If trashed is what we're going with. I'm just trying to figure out how this pope being "trashed" is different from past popes being trashed? Certainty I'm trying to figure out how defending Trump in any way has anything to do with the price of eggs?

St Antony · May 26, 2016

s_gunter said:
Yeah, I gotcha. I'm merely dismayed that the current Pope can be practically trashed in this forum, but yet Trump gets fiery defenses. That was seeming very weird and backwards to me when I posted that. I guess I read too many threads at once, too many tabs open.

The reason for this is that Trump at least professes to be a Republican while, although he obviously doesn't express support for any party, people suspect that Pope Francis sympathizes with the Democrats and their ideology.

Trump hates women

Legend

Well-Known Member

Legend

Legend

Legend

Legend

Dona Quixote

Well-Known Member

Dona Quixote

Legend

Legend

Legend

Contributor

In need of a physician.

Contributor

In need of a physician.

Legend

Contributor

Legend

Newbie

Similar threads