Queller
I'm where?
- May 25, 2012
- 6,446
- 681
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Divorced
- Politics
- US-Others
Not if he was shot accidentally, for example by someone shooting at someone else.When you find a dead person with a bullet to his head, you conclude that someone must has fired a shot at him. The lack of witnesses does not negate the fact that someone must have done this.
Argument from IgnoranceIn the case of the blood clotting mechanism, my argument is that someone must be responsible for designing such a efficient mechanism. The suggestion that no one is responsible for this does not make very much sense.
By the time humans came on the scene, the blood-clotting mechanism had been around for hundreds of millions of years. Its development started some 600-million years ago in small pre-vertebrates with low-volume low-pressure circulatory systems. It developed from white blood cells and cyclic adenosine monophosphate.Without the blood clotting mechanism the person with a wound is likely to die. Are you suggesting that at some point in the evolutionary process, people had no way of surviving a wound?
The Evolution of Vertebrate Blood Clotting
Good. No one claims it happened by happy coincidence.Nature is blind. Arguing that this happened by a happy coincidence makes no sense to me.
Read the link above. No myth about it.Of course, you are free to continue believing this mythical explanation.
Last edited:
Upvote
0