Buddhism: Neither Theistic nor Atheistic

gord44

Well-Known Member
Nov 4, 2004
4,352
658
✟27,716.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Why not why? You say Buddhism needs to address origins. Maybe Buddhism is just being honest and not knowing everything instead of applying a bad myth like other religions do so they can be more 'complete', even if it's nonsense. Kinda like putting Monopoly money in your safe, just to say there is money in there, even if it's not really true.
 
Upvote 0

Yoder777

Senior Veteran
Nov 11, 2010
4,782
458
✟22,581.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Why not why? You say Buddhism needs to address origins. Maybe Buddhism is just being honest and not knowing everything instead of applying a bad myth like other religions do so they can be more 'complete', even if it's nonsense. Kinda like putting Monopoly money in your safe, just to say there is money in there, even if it's not really true.

My point was that Buddhism provides meaning to the lives of millions of people without needing a Creator God.
 
Upvote 0

Yoder777

Senior Veteran
Nov 11, 2010
4,782
458
✟22,581.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This is a scientific knowledge. Are we talking about some which is much bigger than science? Or are you saying the Buddhism is limited by science?

Buddhism is based on Siddhartha Gautama's experience of reality as it is. What need is there of a Creator God if matter can't be created or destroyed?
 
Upvote 0

gord44

Well-Known Member
Nov 4, 2004
4,352
658
✟27,716.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My point was that Buddhism provides meaning to the lives of millions of people without needing a Creator God.

Didn't say it didn't. Was replying to the other chap who feels that if a religion or philosphy doesn't include an 'origin' story, no matter how silly, then is somehow flawed.
 
Upvote 0

Yoder777

Senior Veteran
Nov 11, 2010
4,782
458
✟22,581.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Didn't say it didn't. Was replying to the other chap who feels that if a religion or philosphy doesn't include an 'origin' story, no matter how silly, then is somehow flawed.

It's really obvious to me that the Big Bang was one of an infinite chain of Big Bangs.
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,446
803
71
Chicago
✟121,700.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Why not why? You say Buddhism needs to address origins. Maybe Buddhism is just being honest and not knowing everything instead of applying a bad myth like other religions do so they can be more 'complete', even if it's nonsense. Kinda like putting Monopoly money in your safe, just to say there is money in there, even if it's not really true.

That is fine. But that also makes the religion not complete.
Other religions do address the origin question. The theology may not be good, but the doctrine is there to be evaluated. There is nothing to be evaluated on this issue in Buddhism.

In a study, if there are only details without seeing the whole framework, it is not a complete study.
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,446
803
71
Chicago
✟121,700.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Buddhism is based on Siddhartha Gautama's experience of reality as it is. What need is there of a Creator God if matter can't be created or destroyed?

We do not know if anything can not be created.
Energy can not be created is only a piece of high-school level scientific knowledge.
A deeper issue is time. Can or should time be created? Buddhism does have a sense of (linear) time. When did the time start according to Buddhism?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,446
803
71
Chicago
✟121,700.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
It's really obvious to me that the Big Bang was one of an infinite chain of Big Bangs.

Do you have any relevant scripture in Buddhism which describes something or some process like the Big Bang as we know it now?
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,446
803
71
Chicago
✟121,700.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I don't see why that's a problem The origin of human beings is Nature, just like the rest of the biosphere.

Do you mean evolution?
If you do, then does monkeys have any thought about the origin problem?
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,446
803
71
Chicago
✟121,700.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I'm not understanding why "origin" is such a big problem for you.

Not only to me, but to any one who likes to see the whole picture from the beginning to the end. Only give a recycling circle is not good enough.

In Buddhism, the cyclic process is only a part of it. It does have a process which leads one to get into and to get out of the cycle. So, there should be a beginning and an end. The religion can not just address the end, without say something about the beginning.
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
19,240
2,829
Oregon
✟730,332.00
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Not only to me, but to any one who likes to see the whole picture from the beginning to the end. Only give a recycling circle is not good enough.

In Buddhism, the cyclic process is only a part of it. It does have a process which leads one to get into and to get out of the cycle. So, there should be a beginning and an end. The religion can not just address the end, without say something about the beginning.
I don't believe that Buddhism talks about an end. They learn to experience the "now".

Yes, people "like" to see a bigger picture. I agree. That's mental conceptional stuff. But for anything spiritual, we don't "need" to see the whole picture. Which is what I understand you saying.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
19,240
2,829
Oregon
✟730,332.00
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Do you mean evolution?
If you do, then does monkeys have any thought about the origin problem?
I was looking more at life itSelf and not so much the process. People aren't separate from Nature. We are one and whole with it. We came from it, live and die in it.

With Monkeys being Buddhist and all, I suspect that they live more in the now than in the past with thought's about their origin.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,446
803
71
Chicago
✟121,700.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I don't believe that Buddhism talks about an end. They learn to experience the "now".

Yes, people "like" to see a bigger picture. I agree. That's mental conceptional stuff. But for anything spiritual, we don't "need" to see the whole picture. Which is what I understand you saying.

Buddhism says that the cycle of life has an end. That is the end.

You are right. Many (you, as one) do not need to see the whole picture of a doctrine. That is why there are many Buddhists. My argument here is such a religion is not complete and thus is not good.

In case any Buddhist asked about the origin of human, then there is no answer to that. It is not good.
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,446
803
71
Chicago
✟121,700.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I was looking more at life itSelf and not so much the process. People aren't separate from Nature. We are one and whole with it. We came from it, live in it.

That is the basic concept of life evolution. If you have this idea, then you have to think about animals. They are part of the nature too. In some branches of Buddhism, human and animals have no major difference but are at different level of life. A person may live as a fish in his next life. But, this is confined to the situation within the reincarnation cycle. Eventually, the desire of human is to end the reincarnation and become a human-like being forever.

In all that, there is still no idea about the very beginning of a human life. So, for you, you should believe that you are, you must be, a reincarnation of something.

A scientific thought would be: since the human population increases through time, so there must be more animals reincarnated to human than the opposite way. If so, what does the situation mean?
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
19,240
2,829
Oregon
✟730,332.00
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
You are right. Many (you, as one) do not need to see the whole picture of a doctrine. That is why there are many Buddhists. My argument here is such a religion is not complete and thus is not good.
I don't see how it's not complete, or that it's not good. Science provides those answers to the question your posing. Buddhism is not about doctrines.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
19,240
2,829
Oregon
✟730,332.00
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
A scientific thought would be: since the human population increases through time, so there must be more animals reincarnated to human than the opposite way. If so, what does the situation mean?
Who cares...Only the monkey mind as it bounces around hither and yonder trying to find ways to figure these things out.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0