Thank you, but that is only for one vaccine, and not one I think is very common. Many of the others had very small odds of severe reactions, such as 1 in a million.
Upvote
0
Thank you, but that is only for one vaccine, and not one I think is very common. Many of the others had very small odds of severe reactions, such as 1 in a million.
Wasn't answered by choice. There's a difference.Couldn't be answered,, I notice.
If your grand kids are vaccinated why are they at risk?
Thank you, but that is only for one vaccine, and not one I think is very common. Many of the others had very small odds of severe reactions, such as 1 in a million.
yeah, probably the correlation but not causation thingDo vaccines have a chance to cause autism? Or is it just a correlation, but not causation situation?
interesting idea, but those who are dogmatic against vaccines will still probably find fault in that reasoningSince autism almost always shows up at before age 2, perhaps the more suspect vaccines could be administered after the danger of developing autism had passed. If we waited until age 4, for example, a child's social skills would be well-established.
That being said, I really don't believe vaccines cause autism, and children who show vulnerability to vaccines (DPT, for example) are usually given 1/4 doses so that they don't get bad reactions.
that is a good point, the numbers vary based on the vaccine, but there are a large number of people who either have violent reactions (even death) or the vaccine does not "take" so they can still get the illness that was meant to be preventedLess than 5 in 1000 vaccinated persons remain susceptible to the disease the vaccine was meant to immunize them from.
that is a good point, the numbers vary based on the vaccine, but there are a large number of people who either have violent reactions (even death) or the vaccine does not "take" so they can still get the illness that was meant to be prevented
also, even if you never get the vaccine, it is not a sure thing that you will catch that illness
this is why I am against the idea of mandatory vaccinations, it is about rick, you MIGHT get killed from the vaccine, you MIGHT never catch the illness even if unvaccinated
this is a world of difference from denying a child needed medical care
(sorry to get off topic, but I have heard a lot of people talk about mandatory vaccinations recently)
And that would end their profit stream.
I don't consider it all bad, just mostly bad and though you may consider the end of a profit stream a "win", you do not represent shareholders.Sounds like a win / win.
And I'm so old that my autism predates good few of the allegedly dangerous vaccines.
(It wasn't a diagnosis available when I was a kid, anyway. Diagnosed at 48.)
And in my profession the profit stream was enhanced from people *not* going blind from glaucoma, so the pharma industry was not considered all bad.
(Impressive mess, the human eyeball.)
Because newborns don't get vaccinated. The very young and very old and those that LoAmmi mentions are hugely at risk when hysterical people don't get their kids vaccinated.If your grand kids are vaccinated why are they at risk?
When my youngest kid was at the age to get vaccinated, this whole fuss began in the media linking vaccinations and autism. I asked my pediatrician to give me the honest lowdown, and she gave me her medical opinion based on all the research and evidence, which was that no link had been found. I went ahead and had my child vaccinated, et voilà, no autism. Five kids vaccinated = none of them harmed in any way. None of them caught any of the infections that vaccinations were developed to prevent. No rubella, no measles, no whooping cough. And they didn't give those diseases to other kids/elderly people either.I asked my doctor friend and she said vaccines do not cause autism. And also said that even if they did, being autistic is better than being dead from the pox or whatever. But there is no link, so it's a non issue either way.
I don't consider it all bad, just mostly bad and though you may consider the end of a profit stream a "win", you do not represent shareholders.
My first son did alright, but my second son had a seizure reaction from a pertussis vaccine at about 3&1/2yrs.When my youngest kid was at the age to get vaccinated, this whole fuss began in the media linking vaccinations and autism. I asked my pediatrician to give me the honest lowdown, and she gave me her medical opinion based on all the research and evidence, which was that no link had been found. I went ahead and had my child vaccinated, et voilà, no autism. Five kids vaccinated = none of them harmed in any way. None of them caught any of the infections that vaccinations were developed to prevent. No rubella, no measles, no whooping cough. And they didn't give those diseases to other kids/elderly people either.
Bi-polar is not on the autism spectrum. It's entirely separate. I'm sorry for your son, but you can't blame vaccination for that.My first son did alright, but my second son had a seizure reaction from a pertussis vaccine at about 3&1/2yrs.
He developed bi-polar at 14 . Took 5 yrs and several life threatening incidents to get him on a decent med regimen.
I don't doubt that vaccines are an important link in autism spectrum reactions, and that cover-up is involved.
Most people just trust their luck and join the anti-vaxer hate brigade without ever reading up on how Big Pharma engineered results reporting and hid failure by changing diagnosis.
You have to look for corruption to find it, and most people don't want to find it, never mind being too lazy to look.
Depending on your pension fund manager, you might be funding abortion for all you confidently know.But I might be one, depending on where my pension fund has put its/my money.
But then, that's currently looking odds-on for a pension company win, anyway.
Great. Let's blame everything on vaccinations. As I said in my post above, these issues have been around for centuries prior to vaccinations. But don't let facts get in the way.Sure I can.