So, I guess, when people ask me questions, I should just say. Sorry, you will have to start a separate thread to discuss that....
I have yet to see a topic here stay in line with the OP.....
That's hardly an excuse to go off topic.
Upvote
0
So, I guess, when people ask me questions, I should just say. Sorry, you will have to start a separate thread to discuss that....
I have yet to see a topic here stay in line with the OP.....
So, I guess, when people ask me questions, I should just say. Sorry, you will have to start a separate thread to discuss that....
I have yet to see a topic here stay in line with the OP.....
..........evolution DOESN'T promote brutality. It is a fact that creatures kill other creatures for food and protection. Simply put, it is the way of it. .....
Not so, Warden.
Examine the anatomy and detailed cellular and biochemical makeup of life forms. Mammals are wonderous creatures. All of the biological and molecular processes that take place. They are wonderous in how the "elements" are composed to bring about complex life.
Animals were Created, they did not evolve.
Evolution never happened. There is no historic record of evolution. Only inferences from similarlities, and simple to complex life forms found in the sedimentary rock record.
But I ask you, what did you want Him to do in making a natural world in the eyes of man?
Make it creature-less? Which means in geologic age to be bearing-less of fossils?
One primary element all who object to the Apparent Age use by God is Genesis 6:3 : "and My Spirit will not strive in man forever, for he is also flesh"
People forget God has always worked withing people throughtout time to walk with Him, as many are listed in Genesis, and there are many more not listed in Genesis. This is how I found the Lord, it was not through knowledge, but His Spirit working within me.
This is for others to wake up to. I interact with people daily, many who have know Him before me and some after or since I met Him.
Apparent Age is how God Created Adam & Eve. Is this not so?
Then when God Created the Universe, our galaxy and Earth, did He make it natural? Yes. Did He use Apparent Age like with Adam & Eve?
And how do you know He didn't?
I am in no way qualified to argue that point. However, I think it is safe to say that the owner of that femur bone would be much much larger than a normal human between five and six feet tall..... or am I wrong?A human of that size with a femur that's to scale to that of a real human wouldn't be able to stand, anyway. Square-cube law.
No, you're correct. But because the human would be so much taller and heavier, his/her bones (and in particular the leg bones) would have to be much thicker in addition to being scaled up.I am in no way qualified to argue that point. However, I think it is safe to say that the owner of that femur bone would be much much larger than a normal human between five and six feet tall..... or am I wrong?
No. Any one of us could come up with a number and say that it's a measurement of something.You can debate all you want about "who saw it". I could care less. Someone did because they measured it.
Will do.If you want to say it's a hoax because I cannot produce the real thing...... then go ahead.
Indeed. Likewise, the fact that you think it's true does not make it so. I can't fathom what you seek to gain from thinking that something so preposterous and unfounded is the truth.The truth will always be the truth no matter how you dismiss it.
hundredsof skulls that are tangible and in museums in Mexico and Brazil andPeru,
What do I have to gain? Just evidence that backs up the scripture of Genesis 6, the book of Enoch, the book of Jasher and the book of Jubilee which support the Biblical text in this context.Indeed. Likewise, the fact that you think it's true does not make it so. I can't fathom what you seek to gain from thinking that something so preposterous and unfounded is the truth.
Museums in Peru and Mexico. I don't know. One archaeologist says they are so numerous in Peru and other areas that it's almost like tripping over them. Check out the video in post #616. Give your TOE a break, live a little and watch the whole thing and listen to the questions and answers at the end....Which museums? And what's stopping the EVIL SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE from getting to them? And how come good, honest, wealthy, God-fearing creationists have gone and brought some of these skulls back to America?
Museums in Peru and Mexico. I don't know.
One archaeologist says they are so numerous in Peru and other areas that it's almost like tripping over them.
The evil Smithsonian would love to have this all proved wrong.
WHY... is it not true, does it not exist, is it a lie if it is not brought back to the good ole US of A? Bring it back to the US they said..then it will be solid truth..... LOL how arrogant.
Get over yourself. The artifacts of Egypt, Belgium, Africa, Bulgaria, Peru, Mexico..... whatever, DO NOT have to be brought to the US to be confirmed as actually existing.
So you know that there are museums with skulls, but you don't know where these museums are? How does that work?
So what's stopping them?
I didn't say that. But I do find it odd that, out of all the creationists in the US who would love to have these skulls, none of them ever find them.
Where in Bulgaria? Where in Peru? Where in Mexico? Do you have any specifics whatsoever?
The Humboldt Museum in Winnemucca Nevada used to keep a series of human skulls in a cabinet in the basement for private viewing. They have now repatriated the skulls and no longer have them. I saw them in 2006 and photographed them in the cabinet. From: https://thedavisreport.wordpress.co...elock-cave-the-skulls-of-the-humboldt-museum/
The Humboldt Museum in Winnemucca Nevada used to keep a series of human skulls in a cabinet in the basement for private viewing. They have now repatriated the skulls and no longer have them. I saw them in 2006 and photographed them in the cabinet. From: https://thedavisreport.wordpress.co...elock-cave-the-skulls-of-the-humboldt-museum/
Museum of the necropolis at Caracas, Peru.
Maybe the fact that you could have a tanker full of evidence showing proof but it would all be disbelieved if a kindergarten kid said it was a hoax.
So they let the doubters do their work.
Why be concerned when the internet says it's a hoax and all the sheep believe it.
I am sure that there are customs issues with taking artifacts of this nature out of the country...
I've given a few places. I'm not spending too much more time on this. I'm sure you can run a search engine.
When you find one, let me know.They exist all over the globe. They exist near and around megalithic structures. They are not human. They are larger than humans. They usually have red hair ( who knows why). The skeletons have six toes and fingers and the jaws have two rows of teeth and the brain cavity is 2/3 larger than that of a human skull. They are not created by head boarding and they do not poses the typical suture lines that EVERY human skull has....
A couple points:There are many true Christians who have accepted that life on Earth evolved over millions of years.
In particular, lifeforms have been around for over 200 million years which have continuously lived by biting and devouring other lifeforms.
Has God allowed brutality to be the means for many lifeforms to exist for such a long period of time?
I don't think so. How about you?
Alright, let's take it back a step further. What do you believe you have to gain by attempting to prove that these texts are historically accurate in a literal sense?What do I have to gain? Just evidence that backs up the scripture of Genesis 6, the book of Enoch, the book of Jasher and the book of Jubilee which support the Biblical text in this context.
I am in no way qualified to argue that point.
However, I think it is safe to say that the owner of that femur bone would be much much larger than a normal human between five and six feet tall..... or am I wrong?
You can debate all you want about "who saw it". I could care less. Someone did because they measured it.
If you want to say it's a hoax because I cannot produce the real thing...... then go ahead. The truth will always be the truth no matter how you dismiss it.
I see structures that were build by lost technology, hieroglyphs of giant beings, read text describing giant creatures in many places, hundreds of skulls that are tangible and in museums in Mexico and Brazil and Peru, but, you won't believe it.
Meanwhile you cling to the TOE like it is a pillar of truth. All the while it is fraught with scams and hoaxes of it's own and founded on fossils that are static snapshots of animals that once were, brought to life by the exaggeration, extrapolation and assumptions of men and women who desire with all their hearts that their conclusions be the truth.
So, dismiss the facts and cling to your story. I'll stay with mine.
Which one wore the shirt that said NATURAL SELECTION?This idea that evolution as a concept promotes brutality has some degree of merit, though people misusing scientific concepts is not a valid basis for looking down on the concepts themselves.
Which one wore the shirt that said NATURAL SELECTION?
Klebold or Harris?