Do you think it's Christian to own guns?

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,920
14,014
Broken Arrow, OK
✟702,165.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
t may be legal in some American state to walk around with a six-shooter on your hip, but it will certainly raise suspicion among the law enforcement community.

Six Shooter? That phrase hasn't been used for 100 years?!

As for mine, I carry 1 in the chamber and 15 in the clip.

I've never been stopped or questioned for open carry, and have no knowledge of police objecting to it or being in fear.

The ones you have to worry about are the ones who have to hide them, because they have no license.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,746
12,123
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟652,467.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Keeping Gun is a symbol of violence and god hated it. So a big NO

Some people look at a gun as a symbol. If that's what one wants it for, then I see no purpose. But as a tool, it has its uses. Violence is sometimes needed when your home or family is being assaulted by the guys breaking into your home because they're out of drug money. Are you willing to die or let your children be killed in the name of someone's drug habit? But don't tell me, "Just give them what they want and they'll just go away". I can show you more than a few surveillance videos posted on youtube where a person being robbed was cooperating fully with the robber and was shot afterwards. It's called "eliminating the only witness".
 
Upvote 0

BeStill&Know

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 13, 2015
1,078
553
✟68,040.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Luke 22:36
Jesus: It’s different now. If you have some savings, take them with you. If you have a pack, fill it and bring it. If you don’t have a sword, sell your coat and buy one.

A gun today = a sword of yesterday. We need a way to protect ourselves, our families and our nation. Otherwise we are venerable to the evil whims of those who who plan our demise.

Jesus is telling His followers to prepare for His mission within them.

Matthew 26:52
Jesus: Put your sword back. People who live by the sword die by the sword.

In this Jesus was not telling them not to protect themselves but do not live by the sword. Do not live a life or be a person of violence
 
Upvote 0

ARBITER01

Legend
Aug 12, 2007
13,372
1,699
✟163,996.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
Was it Christian for the Apostles to be armed? Was it Christian for Jesus to tell them to buy swords?

Yes it was, and still is.

Swords were the weapon of choice during those days, but guns are now.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
10,661
5,770
Montreal, Quebec
✟251,078.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Luke 22:36
Jesus: It’s different now. If you have some savings, take them with you. If you have a pack, fill it and bring it. If you don’t have a sword, sell your coat and buy one.
Please read post 350 and comment on the argument provided there - I do not think Jesus was supporting the use of the sword for self-defence.

There is another poster that has mounted a decent challenge to my argument and I have not fully answered his (her?) arguments.

Bottom Line: While I think it's at least arguable that Jesus is endorsing self-defence in the Luke 22 passage, I believe the balance of the evidence points in another direction.
 
Upvote 0

BeStill&Know

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 13, 2015
1,078
553
✟68,040.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Please read post 350 and comment on the argument provided there - I do not think Jesus was supporting the use of the sword for self-defence.

There is another poster that has mounted a decent challenge to my argument and I have not fully answered his (her?) arguments.

Bottom Line: While I think it's at least arguable that Jesus is endorsing self-defence in the Luke 22 passage, I believe the balance of the evidence points in another direction.
In this we as Christians must agree to disagree. I read, but do not agree in your interpretation. Christ did not have to do anything of His own to incite the aggression against Him. It appears as you are saying He manipulated circumstances to fit prophecy. Human nature followed suit.

If we as a nation were forbid to carry arms then this nation and others Christian nations alike would have never formed. ALL earth would be under some tyrannical rule of those who do believe in carrying arms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,746
12,123
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟652,467.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Please read post 350 and comment on the argument provided there - I do not think Jesus was supporting the use of the sword for self-defence.

There is another poster that has mounted a decent challenge to my argument and I have not fully answered his (her?) arguments.

Bottom Line: While I think it's at least arguable that Jesus is endorsing self-defence in the Luke 22 passage, I believe the balance of the evidence points in another direction.

I think you're referring to a previous discussion we've had on this topic. Your reasoning seemed solid, but then again, I've been duped by people who used solid arguments from the bible in support of some pretty strange things. Not saying you're trying to dupe me, but I believe you're sincere in what you believe.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,746
12,123
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟652,467.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
If you think your life is in danger. Christian or not then I think you should have one.

What puzzles me is the idea that we're supposed to have faith in God rather than guns. That's the argument that's often made. It fails to address the idea of personal responsibility for ourselves and our family. Sometimes, the argument is extended to the idea that we shouldn't even have house insurance because if God wants to take our home and belongings, then we shouldn't be having a "backup plan" to override His will.

It makes me wonder how far we should take such logic. Should we go to a doctor when we get sick? Should be lock our doors at night? Would these things indicate a lack of trust in God to take care of us?

I've even been told that we shouldn't have a job to earn money either. They said that the money is the root of all (sorts of) evil, and if we spend 8 hours a day serving it by working for it, then we're ultimately servants of money rather than servants of God. I mentioned that a person has a life beyond those 8 hours each day. He replied, "So it's ok to just be a 'part-time Christian' while serving money full-time"? :sigh:

Ya just can't win!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BeStill&Know

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 13, 2015
1,078
553
✟68,040.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What puzzles me is the idea that we're supposed to have faith in God rather than guns. That's the argument that's often made. It fails to address the idea of personal responsibility for ourselves and our family. Sometimes, the argument is extended to the idea that we shouldn't even have house insurance because if God wants to take our home and belongings, then we shouldn't be having a "backup plan" to override His will.

It makes me wonder how far we should take such logic. Should we go to a doctor when we get sick? Should be lock our doors at night? Would these things indicate a lack of trust in God to take care of us?

I've even been told that we shouldn't have a job to earn money either. They said that the money is the root of all (sorts of) evil, and if we spend 8 hours a day serving it by working for it, then we're ultimately servants of money rather than servants of God. I mentioned that a person has a life beyond those 8 hours each day. He replied, "So it's ok to just be a 'part-time Christian' while serving money full-time"? :sigh:

Ya just can't win!
Friend, I agree... It seems we forget, or do not read "common sense" in the teachings of Jesus. He has always inspired His children to be Wise as serpents, but harmless as doves.
 
Upvote 0

BeStill&Know

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 13, 2015
1,078
553
✟68,040.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What puzzles me is the idea that we're supposed to have faith in God rather than guns. That's the argument that's often made. It fails to address the idea of personal responsibility for ourselves and our family. Sometimes, the argument is extended to the idea that we shouldn't even have house insurance because if God wants to take our home and belongings, then we shouldn't be having a "backup plan" to override His will.

It makes me wonder how far we should take such logic. Should we go to a doctor when we get sick? Should be lock our doors at night? Would these things indicate a lack of trust in God to take care of us?

I've even been told that we shouldn't have a job to earn money either. They said that the money is the root of all (sorts of) evil, and if we spend 8 hours a day serving it by working for it, then we're ultimately servants of money rather than servants of God. I mentioned that a person has a life beyond those 8 hours each day. He replied, "So it's ok to just be a 'part-time Christian' while serving money full-time"? :sigh:

Ya just can't win!
Friend, I agree... It seems we forget, or do not read "common sense" in the teachings of Jesus. He has always inspired His children to be Wise as serpents, but harmless as doves.
 
Upvote 0

BeStill&Know

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 13, 2015
1,078
553
✟68,040.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What puzzles me is the idea that we're supposed to have faith in God rather than guns. That's the argument that's often made. It fails to address the idea of personal responsibility for ourselves and our family. Sometimes, the argument is extended to the idea that we shouldn't even have house insurance because if God wants to take our home and belongings, then we shouldn't be having a "backup plan" to override His will.

It makes me wonder how far we should take such logic. Should we go to a doctor when we get sick? Should be lock our doors at night? Would these things indicate a lack of trust in God to take care of us?

I've even been told that we shouldn't have a job to earn money either. They said that the money is the root of all (sorts of) evil, and if we spend 8 hours a day serving it by working for it, then we're ultimately servants of money rather than servants of God. I mentioned that a person has a life beyond those 8 hours each day. He replied, "So it's ok to just be a 'part-time Christian' while serving money full-time"? :sigh:

Ya just can't win!
Friend, I agree... It seems we forget, or do not read "common sense" in the teachings of Jesus. He has always inspired His children to be Wise as serpents, but harmless as doves.
 
Upvote 0

SeventyOne

Well-Known Member
May 2, 2015
4,675
3,188
✟167,098.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
Does anyone think that 2 swords were enough to face down a group if needed?
Sorry, but in taking the entire NT in context I dont see armed resistance in step with the teachings of love your enemies... he who lives by the sword dies by the sword... this is not my kingdom, then would my servants fight.

Now, this is hard for me and I am still struggling with it as far as SELF defense or family defense. But running around town with guns.... that is asking for trouble imo.
Remember one of the recent school shootings and the one good guy had a gun but said he didnt dare use it because the police who were there within minutes would think he was a shooter and kill him.
And the man that tried to help a car jacking victim and KILLED him by accident!
I just have to wonder if our country has not gotten out of balance on this whole thing.



That's a change of subject. The point is that they were with Jesus and already armed. the actual number of swords is irrelevant, and yes, if Jesus has wanted them to face down a group, it would have been more than enough to do so. Aren't you familiar with Jonathan and his armor bearer killing the 20 men? Two swords against a Philistine garrison, because the Lord willed it so. (1 Sam 14)

I really don't understand the examples either. The guy in the school shooting sounds like someone only interested in saving his own skin, in other words, ("I don't want to save the kids because I might get hurt"), a coward. And the other, accidents happen. I do think we are out of balance in a way, too many people afraid of other people, again, more cowards. Make it easy for people to arm and defend themselves instead, resulting in less crime, and ultimately less fear. You want more fear, disarm the good citizens of a population and force them to live as potential victims.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeStill&Know
Upvote 0

Mary7

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2015
594
481
Mississippi
✟75,750.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
That's a change of subject. The point is that they were with Jesus and already armed. the actual number of swords is irrelevant, and yes, if Jesus has wanted them to face down a group, it would have been more than enough to do so. Aren't you familiar with Jonathan and his armor bearer killing the 20 men? Two swords against a Philistine garrison, because the Lord willed it so. (1 Sam 14)

Make it easy for people to arm and defend themselves instead, resulting in less crime, and ultimately less fear. You want more fear, disarm the good citizens of a population and force them to live as potential victims.
Jonathan was Old Testament which was written to Israel (yes yes I know it has not been done away with) but all I see in the NT written to the church.. to christians.. is to 'love your enemy'. The fear of disarming a population.. that was always my belief until recently when I have started questioning this. We are citizens of heaven and are to trust God so why would I worry about the political climate around me? Is not God in control? Does not the Bible say HE chooses rulers and sets up governments? I now think that Christianity has been mixed with politics and patriotism until Christ is no longer visible or important. And let me tell you, I have been a gun totin' red blooded american southerner all my life, so this is a big change in thinking for me.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Chris Kennedy

New Member
Nov 20, 2015
1
1
53
✟15,126.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Apart from those needing them for living - do you think people should own guns?
I cannot tie Jesus up with a gun-owner that has them for the sake of having them

Absolutely. I'm a Christian and I have 6 handguns and 2 rifles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

SeventyOne

Well-Known Member
May 2, 2015
4,675
3,188
✟167,098.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
Jonathan was Old Testament which was written to Israel (yes yes I know it has not been done away with) but all I see in the NT written to the church.. to christians.. is to 'love your enemy'. The fear of disarming a population.. that was always my belief until recently when I have started questioning this. We are citizens of heaven and are to trust God so why would I worry about the political climate around me? Is not God in control? Does not the Bible say HE chooses rulers and sets up governments? I now think that Christianity has been mixed with politics and patriotism until Christ is no longer visible or important. And let me tell you, I have been a gun totin' red blooded american southerner all my life, so this is a big change in thinking for me.


The fact Jonathan was born before Jesus doesn't change anything about the situation. The OT wasn't written to Israel alone, the Law given to Moses was for the governance of Israel, two very different things.

Careful though, the revelation that the Lord removes and sets up rulers was also written in the OT (Dan 2:21). It's not sound to throw out one section of the OT as irrelevant, simply because it is in the OT, using another section of the OT to support the action.

That said, it is true the Lord does indeed establish and remove governments, and the way we see that happening all throughout the OT (and even through modern times) is by an army of bloody weapons.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
10,661
5,770
Montreal, Quebec
✟251,078.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Christ did not have to do anything of His own to incite the aggression against Him.
Of course He had to do something. If Jesus never did and said things publically, He would never have gotten into trouble.

It appears as you are saying He manipulated circumstances to fit prophecy.
Indeed I am saying this. Why would this surprise you? If Jesus is who we all presumably believe He is (the second person of the Trinity) why would He not "manipulate" things - the Bible is chock full of God "manipulating" events in this world.

If we as a nation were forbid to carry arms then this nation and others Christian nations alike would have never formed.
What? I trust you understand that long before the pilgrims arrived, Christianity had been entrenched for centuries in Western Europe. I have no idea where you are getting your history from.

ALL earth would be under some tyrannical rule of those who do believe in carrying arms.
Again, this appears to be speculation. Dozens of free advanced nations round the globe have lived gun-free for decades and never experienced tyranny. I suspect some will bring up Nazi Germany, but my preliminary research shows this particular example does not really work in favour of your position.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
10,661
5,770
Montreal, Quebec
✟251,078.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Taking the entire NT in context, you would have to also take the context of this quote that you took out of context...

To put it in context, this is Jesus response to Pilate's question about His kingship. The point here is that if He were an earthly King His servants would currently be rebelling against the Roman Government and fighting to free Him. His servants weren't overthrowing the government to preserve His life because His kingdom transcended earthly kingdoms and their boundaries.
I don't quite follow your argument here. I submit that the Scriptures teach that Jesus is indeed a "this-worldly" king who replaces Caesar and all other putative earthly kings. Many people get confused by the "not of this world" language. I can get into the details if need be, but a more accurate translation is "not from this world". Jesus is indeed a real king and it is decidedly suspicious that so many Christians collaborate with efforts to boot Jesus from His rightful place as a real King with real authority and closet Him off as a King merely over some mysterious realm of interior spirituality.

In any event, I think Jesus' point is fairly clear: I am a king but my kingdom is one whose governing principles are not "worldly" ones (not "of this world" in this sense). And of those principles is that obedient citizens of my Kingdom do not use the sword to get things done.

It seems to me that you are evading the uncomfortable implications of Jesus' implicit call to non-violence by adopting the admittedly common view that Jesus does not see Himself as a "real" King over this present world. So your argument seems to be that His followers think that since they (and Jesus) are part of this mystical "other-worldly" kingdom, they do not concern themselves with matters of life and death in this present world. If that is your view, I think there are reasons to be skeptical that it is Biblical.

Anyway, I am not sure exactly what your argument is here - can you please clarify.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

seadog4109

Member
Nov 11, 2014
5
5
✟15,695.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Apart from those needing them for living - do you think people should own guns?
I cannot tie Jesus up with a gun-owner that has them for the sake of having them

I own firearms for the purpose of target shooting - Clay targets for shotguns and paper targets for rifles.
I have killed animals with firearms for both pest destruction and food.
To address the question of the OP - "Is it Christian to own guns"? with another question -

Is it Christian to:
  • Drive a car
  • Own golf clubs
  • Fly in a plane
  • Use a knife and fork
  • Watch television

My answer:
No, it's not Christian to own anything, except perhaps a Bible.
No, it's not Christian to do anything, except perhaps to:
  • Visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
  • Love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
The OP is really saying "I don't like guns, and I don't think anyone who professes to be a Christian should have them".

Praise God that it's not the OP that determines whether I can be "Tied up with Jesus" due to what I own.

I do not feel condemned by God for owning guns, or power tools or a car etc. - even though someone could do bad things with any of them.

If God tells you not to have/do something - then you had best listen.

Do Not Judge Your Brother - Romans 14: 1-3
1Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations. 2For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs. 3Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him. 4Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand.
 
Upvote 0