- Jul 22, 2014
- 41,508
- 7,861
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Stop trying to put words i n my mouth. i was very clear about what I said, but you're trying to read all kinds of other stuff into it. Knock it off!
You said yourself that if a believer sins they are not in any danger in the afterlife in any way. This means that you are exempt from God's laws. In other words it would be like a law that passed that said you can now do whatever speed limit you want on the high way (and the speed limit posting now is just suggestive for safety reasons). Hence, if there is no punishment to a law anymore, it does not have any force to get people to obey it. It is as if it now does not exist. For if people knew that they would not be punished for disobeying the speed limit, more people would speed. You believe that a believer is to uphold God's laws, but they are not really necessary to do so ultimately because one can still make it into heaven and disobey God's laws (according to your world view).
You quoted Rom 8:4. I said read the whole chapter. Pay attention!
Do not insult me. I have read Romans 8 many times. But you are failing to explain what Romans 8:4 means (Which does not help to prove your case in any way).
The Law of Moses has been superseded by the New Covenant, or Law of Grace. Why? Jesus fulfilled the Law of Moses. Completely.
No one is arguing that. I totally agree that we fulfillJesus commandments by walking by the spirit. Stop trying to make it appear that I disagree.
But you do disagree. When you tell others that their are no afterlife dire consequences to sinning, you are giving some people a license to sin whether you want that to happen or not.
Also, Jesus did not fulfill the moral law whereby it was abrogated now. Even Paul says in Romans 13 that if we love our neighbor we will fulfill the aspect of the Old Law like not coveting, etc.
I have seen you say that we must dredge up and confess every sin we can remember in order to remain saved.
I do not believe a person coming to the faith for the first time has to confess every single sin in order to be saved. Simply admitting that they are a sinner and or that they have sinned and need to be forgiven of that sin by Jesus is the first step in their walk in Christ (Who is the source of their salvation).
But if a believer sins again, they have to confess of their sin so as to be forgiven of it.
Where is Grace? When you received Christ, your sins were forgiven. Why dredge them up again? They have already been removed, as far as the east is from the west. God doesn't remember them anymore.
Only past sins. God does not remove present unrepentant sin or future sin. Nowhere in the Bible does it ever teach such a thing. For one it goes against the holiness of God for the Lord to allow one of His people to continue in rebellion against Him. Second, it appears that one's argument suggests they have something to gain (By defending possible sin in their own life or by possibly defending sin in others). So I do not see your argument as being selfless and good but as a selfish one that is focused on self and not God because your belief makes room for a person to think they can abide in horrible unrepentant sin and still be saved.
Good grief! You keep changing the paradigm. If you sin, once, you are not in danger of losing your salvation, and you certainly haven't lost it. Grace, Jason. Your view ignores the Grace of God. Now, if it becomes habitual, repeat sinning, there is the Father's discipline. Once you're a child of God, you fall under His discipline for habitual sin. His discipline is an aspect of His Grace.
But that is not really a deterrent for someone who wants their sin, though. They will think they can serve two masters. But Jesus said you cannot serve two masters. But in your belief, you can.
Consider this:
1Co 5:1-5 It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans, for a man has his father's wife. (2) And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you. (3) For though absent in body, I am present in spirit; and as if present, I have already pronounced judgment on the one who did such a thing. (4) When you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, (5) you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord.
So that his spirit MAY be saved...... when?
"In the day of the Lord."
That means he is not saved. It is saying that his spirit..... MAY be saved at a certain time (Which is the day of the Lord). This would be the time that would confess their sins. Read Joel chapter 2.
Paul didn't indicate that this man had lost his salvation. Rather, paul called for them to turn this man over to Satan to be destroyed in the flesh, so that the man's spirit would be saved. Loss of Salvation? Nope.
If a man's spirit is not saved, that means he is not saved. I am not sure how you can not see that.
If you are a Christian, you are no longer counted as unrighteous. The heathen are unrighteous. The Christian is not.
No. The Scriptures say God is not a respecter of persons. Paul says if any man speaks contrary to the words of Jesus Christ and the doctrine of Godliness, they are proud and they know nothing (1 Timothy 6:3-4). Your teaching that a believer can sin and still be saved is a doctrine that allows for ungodliness (and it is against Godliness).
Then why do you advocate works to remain saved? Works flow from faith. Walking in the Spirit, doing what HE leads you to do, not busy-work, "doing something for Jesus" indiscriminately. A lot of damage is done to the Gospel witness by over-zealous people who think they can do practically anything and stick the name of Jesus onto it, and somehow that will count as good works.
I do not believe man directed works save anyone. I believe works in a true believer's life are God directed works and WILL be present in their life because Christ (God) lives within them.
Lots of misinterpretation in your commentary on the above verses.
Just saying so does not mean you are right. You need to show by the context that you are right.
When I mentioned a break in fellowship with God (over sin) I was not meaning any kind of a situation where the break was of long duration. You seem to think that the moment a Christian sins, they have lost their salvation. That is not biblical.
Nowhere did I ever suggest that the instant a believer sins, they lose salvation and Christ. God first leads a person to repent. If they keep refusing to do so, then God will depart from them. Also, there are cases where a believer's sin was very serious and it caused God to immmediately judge them by destroying them physically (Whereby they then forfeited their salvation). Ananais and Saphirra are just one case as an example.
You run off half-cocked and put words in peoples' mouths that they did not say because you refuse to be corrected by anyone.
I am merely saying a truth that you refuse to except. If you are exempt from God's laws salvation wise that means you are not under law of any kind. You are free to just believe in Jesus and be saved no matter what sins you commit.
You don't answer what people say to you, you talk past them and vomit out the same old stuff that we are trying to correct you on. if you're unteachable, just say so, and we'll ignore you.
I talk past what people say because they are dishonest about what they believe. They are not even consistent in what they believe. They say on one hand they uphold God's laws but then make allowance to then disobey them. Choose this day in whom ye will serve.
Side Note:
Also, chastisement is not a true deterrent for someone who wants the pleasure of their sin. For bad things happen to both good and bad people.
...
Last edited:
Upvote
0